SCIENCE NEWS ONLINE

space March 8, 1997Rule


Letters

In the ear of the hearer?

Inspired by "Sounds of the Seasons" (SN: 12/21&28/96, p. 400), I offer my partial list of the worst and the best:

Offensive

Blissful

A.M.D. Lampen
San Francisco, Calif.

You state that the roars of leaf blowers "are often less loud and intrusive than other neighborhood noises, including the sounds of lawn mowers and trucks."

On the noise pollution score, the leaf blowers I've heard are LOUD! They have actually caused momentary suspensions of indoor meetings at my work. More important, they pollute the air with the toxins they spew from their loosely regulated exhausts.

If we are really concerned about a few leaves, we can always use a broom. I advocate a nationwide ban on leaf blowers.

Jaime Hunter
Garland, Texas

There was a curious omission in the article -- silence. Though technically the absence of sound, silence is a critical part of our aural landscape and can have a profound impact on the way we perceive and interact with our environment.

In a society cluttered with sound, both wanted and unwanted, few of us recognize the importance of occasionally hearing nothing. I have experienced such silence twice in my life, and its beauty and elegance speak louder than any sounds I have ever heard.

Miriam Ruff
Silver Spring, Md.

I am remindedof the debate surrounding STP's unsuccessful introduction of turbine engines at the Indianapolis 500 in my youth. An oft- expressed concern was that the whisper-quiet turbines would displace the throaty combustion engines, and Indy would never be (or at least sound) the same.

The turbines were eventually banned (though ostensibly for a different reason), and The Greatest Spectacle in Racing remains one of the noisiest, as well.

Brian A. Barnhorst
San Diego, Calif.


RedTriRule


Table of Contents -- March 1, 1997



Gray Rule

SEARCH!
SCIENCE NEWS

copyright 1997 Science Service

Gray Rule