|
Is there a super way to make black holes? By R. Cowen
According to one theory, stars more than 10 times as massive as the
sun succumb quietly to gravity after burning up their nuclear fuel. They
collapse under their own weight to become black holes. In a second model, the demise of these stars unfolds less directly.
First, they explode as supernovas, hurling their outer layers into space
and leaving behind a dense, burned-out remnant called a neutron star.
Debris from the explosion then falls back onto the neutron star, turning
it into a black hole. Theorists have spotlighted the supernova scenario because it may
explain the origin of mysterious flashes of high-energy radiation, or
gamma-ray bursts (SN: 7/10/99, p. 28). Now, observations of a star that
closely orbits a suspected black hole strongly support the supernova
model of black hole formation, researchers report in the Sept. 9 Nature. Rafael Rebolo of the Institute of Astrophysics of the Canary Islands
in La Laguna, Spain, and his colleagues examined the composition of the
atmosphere of an ordinary star, about twice the sun's mass, that circles
a suspected black hole more closely than Mercury orbits our sun.
Residing some 10,000 light-years from Earth, the pair of objects is
known as GRO J1655-40 or Nova Scorpii 1994. Using the Keck I Telescope on Mauna Kea in Hawaii, the team found
that the star's outer layers contain oxygen, magnesium, silicon, and
sulfur in abundances 6 to 10 times those found in the sun. That's a
puzzle because the relatively lightweight star would never have reached
the internal temperature, greater than 3 billion kelvins, required to
forge high concentrations of these elements. In contrast, the star's
massive companion could easily have generated them before it became a
black hole. If the companion had collapsed directly into a black hole, the
material would have remained locked inside. However, if the heavyweight
had first exploded as a supernova, ejecting the elements into space, its
lower-mass partner could have captured them. "This is, to our knowledge, the most direct evidence ever found
for a link between a supernova and black hole formation," Rebolo
and his colleagues assert. "There's no other way I can think of that you could actually
have an enhancement [of the four elements] except to say that the star
that just became a black hole must have first blown up and injected that
enriched material into the companion star," says John J. Cowan of
the University of Oklahoma in Norman. Another possibility, enrichment via a wind blown from the massive
star, doesn't work, he says. A wind would contain a variety of
materials, including iron, but the star shows enhancement by only the
elements likely to be released in a supernova explosion, Cowan notes. "These are fascinating observations," says Stan Woosley of
the University of California, Santa Cruz, but he adds that he would like
to see a detailed supernova model that explains the observed abundance
pattern. Woosley has championed the supernova-black hole model to
explain gamma-ray bursts. One complication is the star's proximity to its partner. Before
becoming a black hole about a million years ago, the latter was a star
25 to 40 times the mass of the sun. Its outer layers would have
enveloped the smaller star. The evidence suggests, however, that such direct contact played only
a minor role in altering the star's atmosphere, Rebolo says. For
example, nitrogen, which would have been plentiful in the outer layers
of the black hole's predecessor, has relatively low abundance in the
low-mass companion. Rebolo holds that black holes may arise either through supernova
explosions or direct gravitational collapse. His team plans to search
for the supernova signature in other black hole systems. From Science
News, Vol. 156, No. 11, September 11, 1999, p. 165. Copyright ©
1999, Science Service. |