-
Contents
- Sweet Confusion: Does high fructose corn syrup deserve such a bad rap?
- Closed Thinking: Without scientific competition and open debate, much psychology research goes nowhere
- subscribe
- give a gift
- renew
- RSS Feeds
- email alerts
- Digital Edition
- Podcast
- Past issues
-
Contents
- Better chow yields more milk: A more nutritious form of corn for dairy cows boosts farm profits, teen investigator finds
- Fuzzy future: Kids may suffer impaired vision from spending too little time outdoors, studies suggest
- Building with moon rocks: Working on the moon with lunar soil and grit could prove easier, more efficient and less costly than using earthly materials
Some number-minded researchers argue for a rethinking of statistical analyses. When researchers alter their setup or cherry-pick data, a significance level (p) of .05 can predict a greater than 5 percent chance of finding evidence for an effect that doesn’t exist (as shown above).
Credit: J.P. Simmons et al/Psychological Science 2011
-
Teens take home science gold at Intel ISEF
-
One of the most abstract fields in math finds application in the 'real' world
-
A change in taste cells makes glucose-baited traps repellent
-
Bumps stretch out as mammals drink
-
Coverage of the 2013 American Association for the Advancement of Science meeting
-
The Year in Science 2012
-
Three-part series on the scientific struggle to explain the conscious self
-
Tables of contents, columns and FAQs on SN Prime for iPad
Please alert Science News to any inappropriate posts by clicking the REPORT SPAM link within the post. Comments will be reviewed before posting.
You must register with Science News to add a comment. To log-in click here. To register as a new user, follow this link.