Stranded: A whale of a mystery
  • font_down font_up Text Size
Scientists generally agree that sonar can trigger strandings of certain whales, but no one really knows what leads these deep divers to the beach
access
ELUSIVE CETACEANSScientists generally agree that sonar can trigger strandings of certain whales, such as Cuvier's beaked whales. But no one really knows what leads these deep divers to the beach. Click on the image for more.A. Frantzis

Off the eastern edge of Andros Island lies the Tongue of the Ocean, a hundred-mile, inky blue swathe of sea over the Great Bahama Canyon. Bounded on the south and east by the shallow sands of the Bahamas banks, the seafloor drops precipitously from 3 meters near shore to more than 2,000 meters farther out.

While the region boasts a colorful history of pirates and shipwrecks, scientists will head there this summer seeking treasure of a different sort: beaked whales, some of the deepest diving and least known animals on Earth. The research aims to solve one of the most contentious mysteries in marine biology todaythe relationship between military sonar and stranded, dying whales.

In recent decades, a string of whale strandings have coincided with military testing that uses mid-frequency sonar to detect the low murmur of diesel and nuclear submarines. Beaked whales have washed up on the beach, sometimes with blood in their ears and eyes, but often with no obvious cause of death. After scientists first drew the connection between sonar and the strandings, environmental groups took note, embarking on a campaign to restrict sonar use in certain times and places. The hostilities reached a crescendo this winter in a U.S. federal court. A judge rejected the Bush administration’s attempts to override a ruling that ordered the Navy to take measures to protect marine mammals while conducting sonar exercises. Now the Supreme Court is scheduled to hear the Navy’s appeal this fall.

The wrangling over the stranded whales brings home how science can get lost in the scuffle between advocacy and policy. It also illustrates the highly charged nature of issues involving large, charismatic mammals. And then there’s the attraction of simplicitythe Navy makes a tidy, singular foe. But there is no Moby Dick in this story.

Scientists agree that under certain conditions, sonar does trigger strandings of certain whales. But no one really knows why. Hypotheses, like fish in the sea, are plentiful. Sonar may be so forceful that it damages the whales’ ears. Some researchers speculate that the sounds spur bubble formation in tissue, bringing on deadly embolisms. Or the sonar might distress and disorient the creatures, prompting them to surface too quickly and get the bends. Other researchers have suggested that certain frequencies of sonar might sound like killer whales on the hunt, stimulating beaked whales to seek shallower, safer waters.

Several research groups are trying to untangle what is happening, with the hope of developing strategies that minimize harm to marine life.

The National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration Marine Fisheries Service is partnering with the Navy to undertake some of the first controlled behavior experiments with beaked whales at a Navy Atlantic test center in the Tongue of the Ocean. Others are constructing computer models, looking at CT scans and studying beaked whale anatomy. There are efforts to compile stranding-related information in public databases.

In the meantime, providing policy-makers and the public with advice on how to alleviate the problem has been stymied by holes in the data big enough to swim a whale through. Ziphius cavirostris, or Cuvier’s beaked whalesthe animals most associated with the unusual strandingsare understudied, elusive creatures. They spend little time in surface waters and, until the strandings, people rarely saw these whales at all. Then there are ethical and practical concerns with experiments that involve 2 ½–ton mammals that spend much of their time nearly a mile beneath the surface of the sea.

access
Unusual beachingsScientists recognized a link between mid-frequency sonar and strandings after several Cuvier's beaked whales washed up on the Mediterranean coast in 1996.A. Frantzis

The mystery is compounded by several factors. No one knows where the whales are before they strand, so assigning safe distances from sonar is problematic. The strandings have been associated with specific geologic features, such as deep oceanic trenches near land, but by definition, stranded whales end up near or on land, so teasing out cause and effect is difficult. Because no one knows where and when a stranding will happen, experts might not arrive on the scene until days after the event. By then tissues are often decomposed, as are clues to the animal’s death.

“One of the problems is we’ve really only had information on single exposuresone sound, one mammal,” says Brandon Southall of the NOAA Fisheries Service, who is leading the Bahamas study. “We really need more data.”

Some environmental groups and scientists argue that waiting for such data is folly. It is better to act quicklyperhaps by banning Navy sonar altogetherthan it is to wait. But others express frustration at the bulldog approach, and at the time and money tied up in lawsuits that might be better spent on research. And while blame is slung in the courts, marine mammals face many threats beyond sonar.

“It is absolutely critical that we understand what is going on,” says Darlene Ketten, a senior scientist at the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution in Massachusetts and a researcher at Harvard Medical School in Boston. “But when people ask, ‘Why don’t you shut down the Navy?’ the answer is we’re talking about five animals a year, and I have to balance that with over 100,000 deaths a year from fisheries interactions. I don’t know that shutting down the Navy is going to do anything. And if you are worrying about noise in the oceans, how about the 3-decibel increase per decade from shipping?”

Signal from the noise

Scientists realized the link between whale strandings and mid-frequency sonar in 1996, several months after a stranding in the Mediterranean’s Kyparissiakos Gulf. In early May, Cuvier’s beaked whales began washing up along a 24-mile stretch of sandy beach. The spread of the 12 whales in time and space was unusual, but there was no smoking gun. The whales had stranded alive and appeared healthythey had no obvious wounds, such as blunt trauma from a ship, and no signs of disease. A few animals appeared to be bleeding from their eyes, which prompted more questions than answers. There were various squid remains in the whales’ stomachsbeaks, ocular lenses and fleshsuggesting that they had recently eaten.

“For a beaked whale to have been diving at depths great enough to find squids means they must have been healthy a few hours before they stranded,” says Alexandros Frantzis of the Pelagos Cetacean Research Institute in Greece. The usual suspectsextreme weather, earthquakes, pollution, parasites, irregular geochemical or magnetic circumstanceswere absent. “We had no idea what was happening,” he says.

Several months later Frantzis discovered that around the time of the stranding event the NATO research vessel Alliance was performing “sound-detecting system trials” in the area of the strandings. Although the available data couldn’t prove that the Alliance’s sonar activities caused the event, the abruptness, timing and distribution of the strandings implicated sound, says Frantzis. He reported his conclusions in Nature in 1998.

access
TESTING THE CONNECTIONin the Tongue of the Ocean's AUTEC range, scientists are conducting some of the first controlled experiments on how whales respond to sonar using the Navy's interconnected grid of underwater microphones (inset).B. Southall/NOAA

In the 10 years since Frantzis’ write-up, scientists have linked about a dozen stranding events to military sonar, depending on whom you ask. But whales have been stranding long before the advent of mid-frequency sonar use, which became widespread around 1963. Ketten, who has been compiling records of whale strandings, estimates that since 1950, fewer than 300 whale deaths can be attributed to naval sonar. Other researchers put that estimate at fewer than 100.

Ketten did necropsies on several of the beaked whales whose fatal strandings were concurrent with Navy sonar exercises. These include the oft-cited stranding in the northern Bahamas of nine Cuvier’s beaked whales and three Blainville’s beaked whales, a stranding of three Cuvier’s beaked whales in Madeira and two strandings off Puerto Rico.

The evidence from Puerto Rico was inconclusive. The response team buried most of the headsstandard procedure in tropical areasbut one that destroys crucial soft tissue. Scans of the one intact head suggested it was an old male who had suffered prolonged infection.

Necropsies from the Bahamas and Madeira were more telling. Beaked and other toothed whales such as dolphins have a large pad of fat inside their lower jaw. Sound may enter the whale’s head through the fat, which surrounds a very thin section of the lower jaw next to the middle and inner ears.

“There were no blown-out membranes, no broken middle ear bones,” Ketten says, which would have suggested direct acoustic trauma to the ears. But in a few of the animals, blood had leaked from the brain case, pooling around the ear bones and the fat pad of the lower jaw. This suggested stress and possible pressure-related trauma, she says.

Researchers have raised other pressure-related hypotheses as wellunusual gas bubbles have been found in the tissues of beaked whales that stranded off the Canary Islands. The bubbles hinted at decompression sicknesswhat SCUBA divers call the bendsbut later reports of dolphin strandings off the United Kingdom found similar bubbles in tissues, which led many scientists to deem the bubble evidence inconclusive.

It’s been difficult for scientists to understand pressure-related injuries in animals built for the crushing pressure of the deep sea. These whales spend more than an hour at depths greater than 1,200 metersmore than three times the height of the Empire State Building. Down where it is as dark as a starless night, the whales, like bats, hunt with their ears, not their eyes. Beaked whales have three times as many nerve cells devoted to hearing as people do, Ketten says. They use echolocationemitting sounds that bounce off objects and return to the whale, giving a “picture” of prey shape, size and location.

“These are acoustic animals in the way that we are visual animals,” Southall says.

Beaked whales also have a convoluted circulatory system that during dives sends blood to essential areas like the heart and brain, but cuts off flow to the extremities. Below roughly 70 meters the whales’ lungs collapse, preventing gases from diffusing into blood and tissue where they could cause embolisms.

“These animals have been around 35 million years,” says Ted Cranford of San Diego State University, who in April published in The Anatomical Record an analysis of how sound travels in and out of a beaked whale’s body. “It doesn’t make sense that a few nitrogen bubbles are going to cause chaos. Perhaps if the whales are at their physiological limit. But if it is nitrogen, why don’t we see it affecting other deep divers?” he says.

This question bothers other researchers as well. Beaked whales are often seen around the Navy’s testing site for mid-frequency sonar in the Bahamas. “So we know that marine mammals and beaked whales can live where there is sonar,” Southall says. “It is not like a death ray where as soon as they hear it, they swim to the beach and strand.”

Sound science

The ambiguous data suggest to many researchers that the sonar-related strandings result from a perfect storm of environmental, physiological and acoustic conditions. A recent analysis by Gerald D’Spain of the Scripps Institution of Oceanography in La Jolla, Calif., and colleagues, hinted at the role of surface ductsareas in the water where sound waves are trapped.

Sound travels about four times faster underwater than in airabout 1,500 meters per second versus 340 m/s on land. It slows in colder water, but increases with pressure, speeding up with the weight of the overlying water column. These factors, along with others such as the topography of the ocean floor and surface winds and weather, may mean sound sometimes creeps up on and startles deep divers.

Under certain conditions, as sonar sweeps an area, the pings and clicks could get trapped in a surface duct, making them less audible from below. If a beaked whale is down deep, it might not notice the sound until the ship is quite close, which could prompt the whale to surface. If the animal emerged to surface-duct depth, it would suddenly find itself in an intense, confusing zone of noise, D’Spain says.

Experiments planned by Southall’s team for this summer in the Bahamas are designed to sift through these ideas and get at the peculiar set of circumstances that sends beaked whales to the beach. Using the Navy’s 600-square-mile grid of interconnected, underwater microphones at the Atlantic Undersea Test and Evaluation Center, researchers will continue playback experiments that began last summer, exposing the animals to low levels of sounds and tracking their responses.

The team is also investigating the notion that beaked whales confuse sonar with a pack of killer whales, which emit noises in a frequency similar to the mid-range Navy sonar. Beaked whales’ primary predators, killer whales and great white sharks, tend to hang out near the water’s surface, notes Peter Tyack of Woods Hole, a member of the NOAA investigation team. If beaked whales think they hear the enemy, they might embark on repeated shallow dives for quick escape. Work by Tyack and colleague Walter Zimmer modeling nitrogen bubble growth suggests that if the dives are too shallow, the whales’ lungs may not collapse, a physiological safety mechanism that doesn’t kick in until the animals reach depths of 70 meters. Then even these deep divers might get decompression sickness, and visible bubbles might form in the whales’ tissues, the researchers reported in Marine Mammal Science last fall and June 30 at the Acoustics ’08 meeting in Paris.

Hampered by storms, last summer’s first field season yielded data from only 10 tagged animals, six Blainville’s beaked whales and four pilot whales, Southall says. Pilot whales, which are deep divers and frequent stranders, have similar biology to the beaked whales. But they haven’t shown up in the sonar-associated strandings, so tracking them could reveal important behavioral differences, he says.

“We’re seeing some avoidance,” Southall says. “The animals become quiet and move away from the sound.”

If the behavioral experiments reveal that the whales stop shallow diving as soon as the noise stops, the duration of sonar transmission could be limited, which might limit harm. Precautionary measures such as holding off from sonar exercises when surface ducts are likely to form may keep the creatures from becoming startled and disoriented.

When the Bahamas study is done, researchers may have enough data to solve the stranding puzzle and give policy-makers, the Navy and the courts sound advice on reducing harm to whales.


Comments 3
  • Has anyone consider that these highly intelligent beings, rendered deaf by sonar, suicide by the only means available?
    William Balwanz Will
    Jul. 6, 2008 at 7:06pm
  • The SEAQUAKE THEORY suggest that stranded pods are injured 15 to 60 days prior to the beaching by excessive and rapid changes in ambient water pressure generated during certain types of underwater earthquakes similar to how a scuba diver is injury by descending or ascending too fast.

    The bottom topography where mass stranders live consists mostly of tall, rugged mid-oceanic mountain ranges, deep canyons running down from continental slopes that rival anything seen on land, deep subduction-zone trenches, and thousands of seamounts and guyots often rising up fifteen hundred meters off the bottom. On top of all this, scientists have recently identified hundreds of tall domed structures (some 15 miles long) called "megamullions" that developed within the inside-corners of mid-oceanic ridge spreading segments. (The inside-corner location is significant but in a highly-technical manner best saved for later.)

    These diverse bottom features ride on top of a brittle layer of dense rock about ten kilometers thick in which roughly nine hundred seaquakes greater then magnitude four occur every month.

    For some unknown reason, this seismically-active environment is also the breeding grounds and the nursery for squid, the favorite food of the species known to mass strand. (Current thinking is that the squid lay their eggs along mid-ocean ridges to take advantage of a "warmer" layer of water found along the bottom of the ridge axis.)

    This stranding theory suggest that every so often a violent earthquake ruptures through the seabed, generating pressure changes that are too excessive and/or too rapid for the diving pods to adjust, resulting in a pod injury barotramatic in nature.

    We know that surface waters are not overly agitated when huge blocks of rock shift horizontally along a fault in the seabed. The reason is simple: liquids, like gases, will not transfer shearing motion. This means that the rocky bottom could jerk from side-to-side without much disturbance similar to how an oar slices the water when turned on its edge.

    Even if the seabed were to jerk up and down vertically, the water would not be overly disturbed as long as the speed of the jerking was comparatively slow. The reason is equally simple: If the epicentral rock does not dance too fast, bottom water will flow to the side before great stresses build. This tendency of water to return to equilibrium explains why we can step slowly into a full bathtub without making a ripple.

    The failure of liquids to transfer shear, coupled with water's affinity to flow toward areas of less pressure, means that whales above a major seaquake might feel very little.

    On the contrary, if we suddenly plopped down quickly into a full bathtub, much of the water will splash onto the floor. The same correlation holds true if the seafloor is suddenly thrust upward with explosive speed, especially if the bottom topography can somehow channel, reflect, or focus the seismic pressure waves.

    We can also conclude that the depth of the seaquake's focal point will play a major role in determining the degree of disturbance on the surface. For example, if the center of the action in located ten kilometers down in the rocky bottom, the energy will spread out in an ever widening circle as it moves up through the rock toward the water's interface. This means the rock/water epicenter will be much larger in diameter but the violence at any given point will be weaker. The same applies to the water column. Once the seismic energy enters the water it will spread out again into an ever widening circle before reaching the surface. Thus, a seaquake focused ten kilometers down in the brittle layer of the seabed where the water is five thousand meters deep is not nearly as dangerous as a seaquake hypocentered three kilometers down in water only five hundred meters deep.

    In other words, the depth of focus and the speed of movement are the major factors determining the hazard to whales--not the magnitude.

    The real danger comes when the seabed cracks open, exposing the rock/water interface to lightning-fast vertical thrusting. During such events, the hard bottom becomes like a gigantic piston, pushing and pulling directly at the water column, generating God-awesome pressure changes the intensity of which are governed by speed of the accelerations in the rock and the depth of the hypocenter.

    The reasoning again is simple: rapid up and down thrusting over a small area of seafloor generates intense waves of compressions and rarefactions before the water can move to the side. Once generated, such hydroacoustic sea shocks travel at fifteen hundred meters per second and could interact in extremely destructive ways with a single whale, an entire pod of diving whales, or even with several pods from different species.

    Rapid alterations in hydrostatic pressures generated during a fast-dancing seafloor would cause the volume of air contained inside their massive head sinuses and middle ear cavities to flux back and forth between a squeezed condition to one of over-expansion, cruelly ripping the membranes of these air-filled cavities in a similar fashion to how the eardrums of scuba divers rupture during excessive changes in surrounding water pressure. Blood would quickly fill the sinus cavities and the poor whales would no longer be able to dive and feed themselves.

    The greatest divers the Earth has ever known depend on their natural ability to regulate the volume of air in their enclosed air spaces with changes in ambient pressure at different depths during a feeding dive. They also depend on their air-filled sinuses to help isolate and protect their delicate cochlea from their own loud phonation and also to isolate the two ears from each other and facilitate binaural hearing and echo-navigation.

    Whales injured barotramatically would be in great pain when they tried to dive and feed. They would also lose the ability to generate signals with enough strength to be used in echo-navigation as well as lose binaural hearing and the ability to determine the direction from which a sound came.

    To believe the whales never suffer a diving-related injury is like believing man never stumps his toe.

    Seaquake exposure would leave them with major life-threatening internal injuries, yet looking healthy on outside. If oceanic currents didn't carry them to a beach, the unfortunate wandering whales might swim the wrong way up a river, be struck by a ship, or die in the jaws of fierce predators.

    In the late 1960's, scientists looked five to six hundred miles offshore in an effort to associated major seaquakes with mass strandings. They failed for two reasons: (a) they did not look far enough from the stranding beach, and (b) because they did not realize that extremely shallow seaquakes of lesser magnitude could injure whales. They erroneously assumed that if relatively slow tsunami-type major earthquake did not cause whales to mass strand then neither did the lesser events.

    Alternating pressures above certain seaquakes might increase and decrease the volume of air in the head sinuses and middle ear cavities of a diving pod by up to ten fold and easily tear membranes and other tissues. As mentioned before, barotrauma in the head sinuses can also disrupt binaural hearing and echo-navigation. Thus, the injured pod is stuck on the surface without use of acoustics to fix their location.

    It is further reasoned that if the injury is not too severe and the whales encounter food on the surface, they could recover and return to normal diving and feeding. On the other hand, if food is not available, the pod will become too dehydrated and malnourished and reach a point of no return where stranding or death by sharks is assured.

    Pods destined to strand plod along downstream in oceanic currents eventfully being carried to the beach. This process takes from 15 to 60 days after the injury. A similar situation would hold true for baleen whales and other marine mammals.

    Leading stranding sites around the world all have a few things in common. They are down current at least several thousand kilometers from areas where whales, squid, and earthquakes frequent. These sites have geological land masses that extend out to sea opposing the flow of current that is carrying the disorientated whales. The shape of the land and its location serves as a giant-catching arm.

    California does not get many mass strandings for two major reasons: (a) the shoreline is subject to upwelling of bottom current that tends to carry the non-navigating whales offshore, and (b) the sharks are better feed in California waters due to this upwelling. (This is likely why the US Navy wants to move it sonar practice to off California and Hawaii, instead of in the Bahama's and off North Carolina. They've learned the hard way that injured marine mammals will be carried away from the site of the trauma by the current. Better to practive where the evidence will be carried away from land and out to sea and out of the public's mind.)

    One of the most mysterious aspects of this mystery is why certain beaches seem to have a three-month stranding season (Cape Cod--Nov., Dec., and Jan.) while other beaches show no such seasonal pattern. None of the other theories even ventured to guess why this is true.

    The SEAQUAKE THEORY suggest that the pods follow the squid as they migrate into highly seismic mid-oceanic ridge systems to breed for three months every year. For nine months out of the year, the squid, and the pods that follow them, move into less seismically active areas or into areas where oceanic currents run is different directions. Thus, the whales move in and out of harms way and in and out of different oceanic streams. For example, squid might be found along the mid-ocean ridges where the main oceanic currents travel east. Later, depending on water temperature and etc., the squid move up or down the mid-oceanic ridge system to a different area where the oceanic currents travel west. Thus, different beaches have different seasons depending on where the squid are located.

    Earthquake activity along mid-oceanic ridges also appear to be seasonal, increasing during periods when the average wave height is at a maximum.

    Stranded whales look healthy on the beach because the blubber surrounding them is not for the store of energy—it's their wet-suit. Fat for energy reserve is stored between their internal organs, and is always depleted in stranded whales indicating a long period of time without feeding. Never is fresh food found in the stomachs of stranded whales.

    More later on who some whales are so sensitive to navy sonar



    David  Williams David Williams
    Jul. 5, 2008 at 4:41am
  • Research into beaked whales and in particular Cuvier's is currently ongoing off the North Coast of Spain, an area well known to be an important habitat for these elusive whales. The project is called Diver 2008 and is being conducted by ORCA (Organisation Cetacea), Marinelife, AMBAR and SeaMark Trust. Further details can be found at : www.biscay-dolphin.org.uk/pressrelease/280608.html
    Regards Adrian Shephard - Marinelife
    Adrian Shephard Adrian Shephard
    Jul. 4, 2008 at 4:33pm
Post a comment
Please login or register to participate.

Advertisement
Suggested Reading:
seperator
Citations & References:
seperator
  • Cox, T.M. et al. 2006. Understanding the impacts of anthropogenic sound on beaked whales. Journal of Cetacean Research and Management 7:177-187.
  • Zimmer, W.M., and P.L. Tyack. 2007. Repetitive shallow dives pose decompression risk in deep-diving beaked whales. Marine Mammal Science 23(October):888 - 925. DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-7692.2007.00152.x
  • Rommel, S.A., et al. 2006. Elements of beaked whale anatomy and diving physiology and some hypothetical causes of sonar-related stranding. Journal of Cetacean Research Management 7:189-209.
  • Beatty, B.L., and B.M. Rothschild. In press. Decompression syndrome and the evolution of deep diving physiology in the Cetacea. Naturwissenschaften. DOI: 10.1007/s00114-008-0385-9
  • D’Spain, G.L., A. D’Amico, and D.M. Fromm. 2006. Properties of the underwater sound fields during some well documented beaked whale mass stranding events. Journal of Cetacean Research Management. 7:223–238.
  • Ketten, D.R. 2005. Beaked whale necropsy findings for strandings in the Bahamas, Puerto Rico, and Madeira, 1999-2002. WHOI Technical Reports. Available at link.
  • Jasny, M., et al. 2005. Sounding the depths II: The rising toll of sonar, shipping and industrial ocean noise on marine life. Natural Resources Defense Council. Available at link.
  • Cranford, T.W., et al. 2008. Anatomic geometry of sound transmission and reception in Cuvier's beaked whale (Ziphius cavirostris). Anatomical Record. April 291:353-78.
  • Frantzis A. 1998. Does acoustic testing strand whales? Nature 392(March 5):30.