- :: Atom & Cosmos
- :: Body & Brain
- :: Earth
- :: Environment
- :: Genes & Cells
- :: Humans
- :: Life
- :: Matter & Energy
- :: Molecules
- :: Science & Society
- :: Other Topics
- :: Science News For Kids
Off the eastern edge of
While the region boasts a colorful history of pirates and shipwrecks, scientists will head there this summer seeking treasure of a different sort: beaked whales, some of the deepest diving and least known animals on Earth. The research aims to solve one of the most contentious mysteries in marine biology today — the relationship between military sonar and stranded, dying whales.
In recent decades, a string of whale strandings have
coincided with military testing that uses mid-frequency sonar to detect the low
murmur of diesel and nuclear submarines. Beaked whales have washed up on the
beach, sometimes with blood in their ears and eyes, but often with no obvious
cause of death. After scientists first drew the connection between sonar and the strandings,
environmental groups took note, embarking on a campaign to restrict sonar use
in certain times and places. The hostilities reached a crescendo this winter in
a
The wrangling over the stranded whales brings home how science can get lost in the scuffle between advocacy and policy. It also illustrates the highly charged nature of issues involving large, charismatic mammals. And then there’s the attraction of simplicity — the Navy makes a tidy, singular foe. But there is no Moby Dick in this story.
Scientists agree that under certain conditions, sonar does trigger strandings of certain whales. But no one really knows why. Hypotheses, like fish in the sea, are plentiful. Sonar may be so forceful that it damages the whales’ ears. Some researchers speculate that the sounds spur bubble formation in tissue, bringing on deadly embolisms. Or the sonar might distress and disorient the creatures, prompting them to surface too quickly and get the bends. Other researchers have suggested that certain frequencies of sonar might sound like killer whales on the hunt, stimulating beaked whales to seek shallower, safer waters.
Several research groups are trying to untangle what is happening, with the hope of developing strategies that minimize harm to marine life.
The National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration Marine Fisheries Service is partnering with the Navy to undertake some of the first controlled behavior experiments with beaked whales at a Navy Atlantic test center in the Tongue of the Ocean. Others are constructing computer models, looking at CT scans and studying beaked whale anatomy. There are efforts to compile stranding-related information in public databases.
In the meantime, providing policy-makers and the public with advice on how to alleviate the problem has been stymied by holes in the data big enough to swim a whale through. Ziphius cavirostris, or Cuvier’s beaked whales — the animals most associated with the unusual strandings — are understudied, elusive creatures. They spend little time in surface waters and, until the strandings, people rarely saw these whales at all. Then there are ethical and practical concerns with experiments that involve 2 ½–ton mammals that spend much of their time nearly a mile beneath the surface of the sea.
The mystery is compounded by several factors. No one knows where the whales are before they strand, so assigning safe distances from sonar is problematic. The strandings have been associated with specific geologic features, such as deep oceanic trenches near land, but by definition, stranded whales end up near or on land, so teasing out cause and effect is difficult. Because no one knows where and when a stranding will happen, experts might not arrive on the scene until days after the event. By then tissues are often decomposed, as are clues to the animal’s death.
“One of the problems is we’ve really only had information on
single exposures — one sound, one mammal,” says
Brandon Southall of the NOAA Fisheries Service, who is leading the
Some environmental groups and scientists argue that waiting for such data is folly. It is better to act quickly — perhaps by banning Navy sonar altogether — than it is to wait. But others express frustration at the bulldog approach, and at the time and money tied up in lawsuits that might be better spent on research. And while blame is slung in the courts, marine mammals face many threats beyond sonar.
“It is absolutely critical that we understand what is going
on,” says Darlene Ketten, a senior scientist at the Woods Hole Oceanographic
Institution in
Signal from the noise
Scientists realized the link between whale strandings and
mid-frequency sonar in 1996, several months after a stranding in the
Mediterranean’s
“For a beaked whale to have been diving at depths great
enough to find squids means they must have been healthy a few hours before they
stranded,” says Alexandros Frantzis of the Pelagos Cetacean Research Institute in
Several months later Frantzis discovered that around the
time of the stranding event the NATO research vessel
In the 10 years since Frantzis’ write-up, scientists have linked about a dozen stranding events to military sonar, depending on whom you ask. But whales have been stranding long before the advent of mid-frequency sonar use, which became widespread around 1963. Ketten, who has been compiling records of whale strandings, estimates that since 1950, fewer than 300 whale deaths can be attributed to naval sonar. Other researchers put that estimate at fewer than 100.
Ketten did necropsies on several of the beaked whales whose
fatal strandings were concurrent with Navy sonar exercises. These include the
oft-cited stranding in the northern
The evidence from
Necropsies from the
“There were no blown-out membranes, no broken middle ear bones,” Ketten says, which would have suggested direct acoustic trauma to the ears. But in a few of the animals, blood had leaked from the brain case, pooling around the ear bones and the fat pad of the lower jaw. This suggested stress and possible pressure-related trauma, she says.
Researchers have raised other pressure-related hypotheses as
well — unusual gas bubbles have been
found in the tissues of beaked whales that stranded off the
It’s been difficult for scientists to understand
pressure-related injuries in animals built for the crushing pressure of the
deep sea. These whales spend more than an hour at depths greater than 1,200
meters — more than three times the height
of the
“These are acoustic animals in the way that we are visual animals,” Southall says.
Beaked whales also have a convoluted circulatory system that during dives sends blood to essential areas like the heart and brain, but cuts off flow to the extremities. Below roughly 70 meters the whales’ lungs collapse, preventing gases from diffusing into blood and tissue where they could cause embolisms.
“These animals have been around 35 million years,” says Ted
Cranford of
This question bothers other researchers as well. Beaked
whales are often seen around the Navy’s testing site for mid-frequency sonar in
the
Sound science
The ambiguous data suggest to many researchers that the sonar-related strandings result from a perfect storm of environmental, physiological and acoustic conditions. A recent analysis by Gerald D’Spain of the Scripps Institution of Oceanography in La Jolla, Calif., and colleagues, hinted at the role of surface ducts — areas in the water where sound waves are trapped.
Sound travels about four times faster underwater than in air — about 1,500 meters per second versus 340 m/s on land. It slows in colder water, but increases with pressure, speeding up with the weight of the overlying water column. These factors, along with others such as the topography of the ocean floor and surface winds and weather, may mean sound sometimes creeps up on and startles deep divers.
Under certain conditions, as sonar sweeps an area, the pings and clicks could get trapped in a surface duct, making them less audible from below. If a beaked whale is down deep, it might not notice the sound until the ship is quite close, which could prompt the whale to surface. If the animal emerged to surface-duct depth, it would suddenly find itself in an intense, confusing zone of noise, D’Spain says.
Experiments planned by Southall’s team for this summer in
the
The team is also investigating the notion that beaked whales
confuse sonar with a pack of killer whales, which emit noises in a frequency
similar to the mid-range Navy sonar. Beaked whales’ primary predators, killer
whales and great white sharks, tend to hang out near the water’s surface, notes
Peter Tyack of Woods Hole, a member of the NOAA investigation team. If beaked
whales think they hear the enemy, they might embark on repeated shallow dives
for quick escape. Work by Tyack and colleague Walter Zimmer modeling nitrogen bubble growth suggests that if the dives are too
shallow, the whales’ lungs may not collapse, a physiological safety mechanism
that doesn’t kick in until the animals reach depths of 70 meters. Then even
these deep divers might get decompression sickness, and visible bubbles might
form in the whales’ tissues, the researchers reported in Marine Mammal
Science last fall and June 30 at the Acoustics ’08 meeting in
Hampered by storms, last summer’s first field season yielded data from only 10 tagged animals, six Blainville’s beaked whales and four pilot whales, Southall says. Pilot whales, which are deep divers and frequent stranders, have similar biology to the beaked whales. But they haven’t shown up in the sonar-associated strandings, so tracking them could reveal important behavioral differences, he says.
“We’re seeing some avoidance,” Southall says. “The animals become quiet and move away from the sound.”
If the behavioral experiments reveal that the whales stop shallow diving as soon as the noise stops, the duration of sonar transmission could be limited, which might limit harm. Precautionary measures such as holding off from sonar exercises when surface ducts are likely to form may keep the creatures from becoming startled and disoriented.
When the
- Cox, T.M. et al. 2006. Understanding the impacts of anthropogenic sound on beaked whales. Journal of Cetacean Research and Management 7:177-187.
- Zimmer, W.M., and P.L. Tyack. 2007. Repetitive shallow dives pose decompression risk in deep-diving beaked whales. Marine Mammal Science 23(October):888 - 925. DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-7692.2007.00152.x
- Rommel, S.A., et al. 2006. Elements of beaked whale anatomy and diving physiology and some hypothetical causes of sonar-related stranding. Journal of Cetacean Research Management 7:189-209.
- Beatty, B.L., and B.M. Rothschild. In press. Decompression syndrome and the evolution of deep diving physiology in the Cetacea. Naturwissenschaften. DOI: 10.1007/s00114-008-0385-9
- D’Spain, G.L., A. D’Amico, and D.M. Fromm. 2006. Properties of the underwater sound fields during some well documented beaked whale mass stranding events. Journal of Cetacean Research Management. 7:223–238.
- Ketten, D.R. 2005. Beaked whale necropsy findings for strandings in the Bahamas, Puerto Rico, and Madeira, 1999-2002. WHOI Technical Reports. Available at link.
- Jasny, M., et al. 2005. Sounding the depths II: The rising toll of sonar, shipping and industrial ocean noise on marine life. Natural Resources Defense Council. Available at link.
- Cranford, T.W., et al. 2008. Anatomic geometry of sound transmission and reception in Cuvier's beaked whale (Ziphius cavirostris). Anatomical Record. April 291:353-78.
- Frantzis A. 1998. Does acoustic testing strand whales? Nature 392(March 5):30.

The bottom topography where mass stranders live consists mostly of tall, rugged mid-oceanic mountain ranges, deep canyons running down from continental slopes that rival anything seen on land, deep subduction-zone trenches, and thousands of seamounts and guyots often rising up fifteen hundred meters off the bottom. On top of all this, scientists have recently identified hundreds of tall domed structures (some 15 miles long) called "megamullions" that developed within the inside-corners of mid-oceanic ridge spreading segments. (The inside-corner location is significant but in a highly-technical manner best saved for later.)
These diverse bottom features ride on top of a brittle layer of dense rock about ten kilometers thick in which roughly nine hundred seaquakes greater then magnitude four occur every month.
For some unknown reason, this seismically-active environment is also the breeding grounds and the nursery for squid, the favorite food of the species known to mass strand. (Current thinking is that the squid lay their eggs along mid-ocean ridges to take advantage of a "warmer" layer of water found along the bottom of the ridge axis.)
This stranding theory suggest that every so often a violent earthquake ruptures through the seabed, generating pressure changes that are too excessive and/or too rapid for the diving pods to adjust, resulting in a pod injury barotramatic in nature.
We know that surface waters are not overly agitated when huge blocks of rock shift horizontally along a fault in the seabed. The reason is simple: liquids, like gases, will not transfer shearing motion. This means that the rocky bottom could jerk from side-to-side without much disturbance similar to how an oar slices the water when turned on its edge.
Even if the seabed were to jerk up and down vertically, the water would not be overly disturbed as long as the speed of the jerking was comparatively slow. The reason is equally simple: If the epicentral rock does not dance too fast, bottom water will flow to the side before great stresses build. This tendency of water to return to equilibrium explains why we can step slowly into a full bathtub without making a ripple.
The failure of liquids to transfer shear, coupled with water's affinity to flow toward areas of less pressure, means that whales above a major seaquake might feel very little.
On the contrary, if we suddenly plopped down quickly into a full bathtub, much of the water will splash onto the floor. The same correlation holds true if the seafloor is suddenly thrust upward with explosive speed, especially if the bottom topography can somehow channel, reflect, or focus the seismic pressure waves.
We can also conclude that the depth of the seaquake's focal point will play a major role in determining the degree of disturbance on the surface. For example, if the center of the action in located ten kilometers down in the rocky bottom, the energy will spread out in an ever widening circle as it moves up through the rock toward the water's interface. This means the rock/water epicenter will be much larger in diameter but the violence at any given point will be weaker. The same applies to the water column. Once the seismic energy enters the water it will spread out again into an ever widening circle before reaching the surface. Thus, a seaquake focused ten kilometers down in the brittle layer of the seabed where the water is five thousand meters deep is not nearly as dangerous as a seaquake hypocentered three kilometers down in water only five hundred meters deep.
In other words, the depth of focus and the speed of movement are the major factors determining the hazard to whales--not the magnitude.
The real danger comes when the seabed cracks open, exposing the rock/water interface to lightning-fast vertical thrusting. During such events, the hard bottom becomes like a gigantic piston, pushing and pulling directly at the water column, generating God-awesome pressure changes the intensity of which are governed by speed of the accelerations in the rock and the depth of the hypocenter.
The reasoning again is simple: rapid up and down thrusting over a small area of seafloor generates intense waves of compressions and rarefactions before the water can move to the side. Once generated, such hydroacoustic sea shocks travel at fifteen hundred meters per second and could interact in extremely destructive ways with a single whale, an entire pod of diving whales, or even with several pods from different species.
Rapid alterations in hydrostatic pressures generated during a fast-dancing seafloor would cause the volume of air contained inside their massive head sinuses and middle ear cavities to flux back and forth between a squeezed condition to one of over-expansion, cruelly ripping the membranes of these air-filled cavities in a similar fashion to how the eardrums of scuba divers rupture during excessive changes in surrounding water pressure. Blood would quickly fill the sinus cavities and the poor whales would no longer be able to dive and feed themselves.
The greatest divers the Earth has ever known depend on their natural ability to regulate the volume of air in their enclosed air spaces with changes in ambient pressure at different depths during a feeding dive. They also depend on their air-filled sinuses to help isolate and protect their delicate cochlea from their own loud phonation and also to isolate the two ears from each other and facilitate binaural hearing and echo-navigation.
Whales injured barotramatically would be in great pain when they tried to dive and feed. They would also lose the ability to generate signals with enough strength to be used in echo-navigation as well as lose binaural hearing and the ability to determine the direction from which a sound came.
To believe the whales never suffer a diving-related injury is like believing man never stumps his toe.
Seaquake exposure would leave them with major life-threatening internal injuries, yet looking healthy on outside. If oceanic currents didn't carry them to a beach, the unfortunate wandering whales might swim the wrong way up a river, be struck by a ship, or die in the jaws of fierce predators.
In the late 1960's, scientists looked five to six hundred miles offshore in an effort to associated major seaquakes with mass strandings. They failed for two reasons: (a) they did not look far enough from the stranding beach, and (b) because they did not realize that extremely shallow seaquakes of lesser magnitude could injure whales. They erroneously assumed that if relatively slow tsunami-type major earthquake did not cause whales to mass strand then neither did the lesser events.
Alternating pressures above certain seaquakes might increase and decrease the volume of air in the head sinuses and middle ear cavities of a diving pod by up to ten fold and easily tear membranes and other tissues. As mentioned before, barotrauma in the head sinuses can also disrupt binaural hearing and echo-navigation. Thus, the injured pod is stuck on the surface without use of acoustics to fix their location.
It is further reasoned that if the injury is not too severe and the whales encounter food on the surface, they could recover and return to normal diving and feeding. On the other hand, if food is not available, the pod will become too dehydrated and malnourished and reach a point of no return where stranding or death by sharks is assured.
Pods destined to strand plod along downstream in oceanic currents eventfully being carried to the beach. This process takes from 15 to 60 days after the injury. A similar situation would hold true for baleen whales and other marine mammals.
Leading stranding sites around the world all have a few things in common. They are down current at least several thousand kilometers from areas where whales, squid, and earthquakes frequent. These sites have geological land masses that extend out to sea opposing the flow of current that is carrying the disorientated whales. The shape of the land and its location serves as a giant-catching arm.
California does not get many mass strandings for two major reasons: (a) the shoreline is subject to upwelling of bottom current that tends to carry the non-navigating whales offshore, and (b) the sharks are better feed in California waters due to this upwelling. (This is likely why the US Navy wants to move it sonar practice to off California and Hawaii, instead of in the Bahama's and off North Carolina. They've learned the hard way that injured marine mammals will be carried away from the site of the trauma by the current. Better to practive where the evidence will be carried away from land and out to sea and out of the public's mind.)
One of the most mysterious aspects of this mystery is why certain beaches seem to have a three-month stranding season (Cape Cod--Nov., Dec., and Jan.) while other beaches show no such seasonal pattern. None of the other theories even ventured to guess why this is true.
The SEAQUAKE THEORY suggest that the pods follow the squid as they migrate into highly seismic mid-oceanic ridge systems to breed for three months every year. For nine months out of the year, the squid, and the pods that follow them, move into less seismically active areas or into areas where oceanic currents run is different directions. Thus, the whales move in and out of harms way and in and out of different oceanic streams. For example, squid might be found along the mid-ocean ridges where the main oceanic currents travel east. Later, depending on water temperature and etc., the squid move up or down the mid-oceanic ridge system to a different area where the oceanic currents travel west. Thus, different beaches have different seasons depending on where the squid are located.
Earthquake activity along mid-oceanic ridges also appear to be seasonal, increasing during periods when the average wave height is at a maximum.
Stranded whales look healthy on the beach because the blubber surrounding them is not for the store of energy—it's their wet-suit. Fat for energy reserve is stored between their internal organs, and is always depleted in stranded whales indicating a long period of time without feeding. Never is fresh food found in the stomachs of stranded whales.
More later on who some whales are so sensitive to navy sonar
Regards Adrian Shephard - Marinelife