Vertical Agriculture
Web edition : Thursday, May 29th, 2008
font_down font_up Text Size

We tend to think of farms as huge patches of land that roll across the landscape. Their size has tended to relegate them to rural tracts, well beyond the borders of the cities that will consume their bounty. But Dickson Despommier at Columbia University would like to turn that idea on its side – literally. Instead of farming in the country, he’d do it in the city. And instead of letting crops sprawl across acre after acre, he’d plant them floor upon floor in buildings.

An elevator might you take you up to 10th floor – tomatoes and peppers, or 15th floor – strawberries and pumpkins. And because the lighting for these indoor farms could be supplied by color-tuned LEDs, there’s no reason why the plants could not be grown in windowless basement complexes.

The idea, Despommier told attendees yesterday at the inaugural World Science Summit, here in New York City, is to return the land back to nature rather than steal its productivity for urban food production. It’s also far more energy efficient to truck crops within a city, perhaps moving them no more than a couple miles, than to ship them hundreds of miles or more to consumers.

The ideal, he said, would be to have floor-to-ceiling, glass-walled skyscraper farms where each building has been designed to optimize the internal reflection of incoming sunlight. LEDs would supplement the energy requirements of photosynthesis as needed.

It’s an intriguing idea. A daughter of the Corn Belt, I have to say I was never impressed by the grandeur of monoculture croplands that stretched out as far as the eye could see. The idea of returning trees, shrubs, and ecological diversity to much of rural America appeals.

I also like the idea of bringing agriculture back to the people. Too few kids know where our food comes from. The idea that it might one day come from the building down the street would restore an appreciation for the fact that agriculture provides food, not grocery stores.

Despommier acknowledges that this paradigm shift might have problems supplying meat from the hoof. But for the leafy, fruity, or finned staples, he says, urban agriculture might just be the ticket. 


Found in: Agriculture, Environment and Science & Society
Comments 4
  • I sat through a second briefing by Despommier, this one on Friday night, and learned that not only would these skyscraper-farm silos be designed to raise crops, but also to potentially serve as office and/or apartment buildings. Explained Despommier, after a long day at the office, someone could pick up freshly harvested produce grown on different floors of his/her dwelling. And not having to weather the vicissitudes of pests and an erratic climate, this food could be grown cleaner and with greater yields (at least theoretically) than crops that had been planted outdoors.
    jar jar
    Jun. 2, 2008 at 4:15pm
  • This is intriguing, but it brings up a lot of questions. Do LEDs currently exist that produce light of the correct spectrums for our major crops? How expensive are they to produce and power? How much would such a building cost to build and maintain? Would urban farmers be paid less than rural ones?

    Ultimately, it comes down to a question of money. If vertical, urban agriculture will never be cheaper than horizontal, rural agriculture, then it will never happen in any appreciable volume. Did Mr. Despommier have any cost projections?

    An interesting alternative would be personal indoor garden kits based on these principles. Imagine a small unit to monitor your indoor herb garden and produce extra light as required.
    Chris Jones Chris Jones
    Jun. 5, 2008 at 1:35pm
  • It should be possible to turn some waste products of humans [via composting] and the finny critters [via the ability of plants to filter and clean water] into inputs for the vegetative phases thereby partially closing the loop.
    Elizabeth Oscanyan Elizabeth Oscanyan
    Jun. 8, 2008 at 8:46pm
  • President Obama’s proposal calling for the elimination of direct payments to large “agribusinesses” is drawing a strong reaction from members of Congress and some of the nation’s farm organizations. In his budget recommendations for fiscal 2010, the president is asking Congress to end direct payments to large farming operations, reduce subsidies for federal crop insurance programs and eliminate storage payments on cotton. He also is increasing expenditures on education, security and defense, and also in the Department of Commerce – the top position remains unfilled. Many people have voiced concerns that the increased expenditures will result in a larger deficit. He has responded to these concerns by undertaking a good look at what we spend, and going through the...

    Click here to read more: http://personalmoneystore.com/moneyblog/2009/02/27/details-obamas-budget-proposals/
    ChristopherF Fed ChristopherF Fed
    Mar. 7, 2009 at 3:37am
Post a comment

Please login or register to participate.


Advertisement