- :: Atom & Cosmos
- :: Body & Brain
- :: Earth
- :: Environment
- :: Genes & Cells
- :: Humans
- :: Life
- :: Matter & Energy
- :: Molecules
- :: Science & Society
- :: Other Topics
- :: Science News For Kids
Long before chickens or eggs, life had to solve a difficult chicken-and-egg problem.
The first cells to arise on the primordial Earth needed nutrients from their surroundings in order to grow and reproduce long enough to evolve complex proteins. Yet the membranes that encapsulate modern cells need complex proteins to act as pores that let these nutrients pass into the cells. Presumably, primitive cells wouldn’t have had these sophisticated pore proteins, so scientists have wondered how the first living cells managed to get nutrients from their environment.
In trying to make simple artificial cells from scratch, researchers have found a plausible way around this dilemma. By making artificial membranes from various combinations of fat molecules different from those in modern cell membranes, the scientists discovered recipes for membranes that allow nutrients to pass into the cells.
Previous experiments have shown that the fat molecules used in these experiments could have existed on Earth before life got started, and in saltwater, these molecules spontaneously ball up into tiny spheres, which could have formed the earliest cells.
It’s doubtful that the first living cells actually had membranes made from the exact mixtures of fats used in these experiments, scientists agree. But the work shows that it’s physically possible that primitive cells could have gotten nutrients from the environment without help from proteins, the team reports online June 4 in Nature.
“I don’t think there’s any previous study that shows that you can get nutrients across the membrane,” says lead scientist Jack Szostak, a geneticist at
While the membranes, which consisted of fatty acids and glycerol monoesters instead of the phospholipids found in modern cell membranes, allowed small nutrients to pass through, larger DNA-like molecules were trapped within the spheres. So cells made from these membranes would be able to hold on to their genetic code.
The research “certainly makes a contribution here, suggesting that primitive compartments surrounded by simple membranes might have come into existence naturally,” comments Robert Shapiro, an origin-of-life researcher at
Szostak’s eventual goal is to create a simple form of artificial life by wrapping self-replicating, DNA-like molecules inside such membranes and providing nutrients so that the “protocells” can grow and divide.
“If we weren’t trying to build these protocells, we never would have discovered this,” Szostak says.
Found in: Life and Molecules
- Mansy, S.S. . . . and J.W. Szostak. In press. Template-directed synthesis of a genetic polymer in a model protocell. Nature. DOI: 10.1038/nature07018

Dr. Szostak, on the other hand, has sought to assemble proto-cells, and noted the importance for trans-membrane transport of nutrients in early cells. The findings of both teams of researchers are concordant with the mathematical model for recharge rate of ionic bonds of biomass, given variations in the efficiency with which this mass is able to capture the chemical energy needed for recharge, an essentially-electrochemical statement of redox coupling. This is the 'metabolism first' that Robert Shapiro insists upon, but with a key difference. This difference concerns the question of the priority of replication or metabolism.
This model is seen in a graph of the equation, called Kleiber's Law, relating biomass size to metabolic recharge rate, but with an exponent that includes the variable for efficiency of redox coupling, called metabolic efficiency. There is a different curve for each biomass. The model does not reveal any discontinuity in the curves at masses similar to nano-bacteria and proto-cells. The graph illustrates how change in biomass is driven by bioenergetic considerations related to fluctuations in efficiency, and to pressures for recharge rate stability, that act upon biomass over time. Metabolism cannot be divorced from replication; replication is one affect on biomass of energetic fluctuations.
What the two teams are examining is the scale at which the movement from non-life to life may have been made. The math shows no identifiable point based upon either metabolic or replicative considerations. The equation shows that beginning biomass had to have salt bridges to conduct redox energy, a requirement for electrochemistry, and for the delivery of nutrients (something Dr. Szostak's team is investigating), and seen in the ion channel. This is where life began, with metabolism. Division and growth of biomass is possible because of the aggregation of nano-bacteria inside the vesicle, and their breaking apart when the energy is not there to sustain the recharge rate of the organic molecule. This is the world of Miller/Urey metabolism, only it was in an aqueous atmosphere where sustained and fluctuating discharge of hydrogen sulfide made possible its oxidation into sulfurous acid and energy. The fluctuation of redox efficiency, and thermodynamic pressure, acted upon biomass. The model shows these forces pressuring for a one gram mass of around 25% redox coupling efficiency. All phylogeny and ontogeny turns around these numbers that mark the limits of genetic diversity, and articulate the aging process that is inseparable from the recharge rate of the biomass.
The lab teams are working out the details that the math depicts. They just don't have the math yet.
Please login or register to participate.