Web edition: June 8, 2011
A plethora of genetic changes contributes to autism spectrum disorders, three new studies find. The new genetic data illustrate why researchers have struggled to find a single cause for the baffling suite of developmental and behavioral conditions, and may help point the way to a unifying process underlying them. The studies also begin to explain why autism spectrum disorders are more common in boys than girls.
Though the specific genetic changes identified by a trio of papers in the June 9 Neuron account for only 5 to 8 percent of autism cases, what they reveal about the biology of autism may have much wider implications.
“I think we’re still scratching the surface,” says Steve Scherer of the Hospital for Sick Children in Toronto, who wasn’t involved in the studies. “But we’re getting there, and I think these are very important papers.”
Two of the studies examined DNA samples taken from carefully screened families, a cohort called the Simons Simplex Collection. Each family included two unaffected parents and one high-functioning child diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder. For most families, an unaffected sibling was also included. By studying genetic changes in unaffected family members, the researchers could find abnormalities — specifically, duplications and deletions of DNA called copy number variations — that were not passed down from parents but arose spontaneously in the genomes of affected children.
“What was surprising is how unique each of the variants is,” says geneticist Huda Zoghbi of Baylor College of Medicine in Houston. “This really speaks to the immense heterogeneity of autism. We suspected it, but these data show it clearly.”
The results may also help explain why autism spectrum disorders are much more common in boys. Autism strikes four boys for every girl, yet girls’ DNA actually harbors more of these rare autism-associated genome duplications and deletions, a study led by Michael Wigler of Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory in New York shows. And these genetic anomalies aren’t just more abundant in girls; they are also more severe. For a girl with autism, the median number of genes scrambled by duplication or wiped out by a deletion was 15.5, while for a boy with autism, the number was just two.
Through some mysterious process, girls are just more resistant than boys to the genetic causes of autism, the results suggest. “Overall, it does look like a girl can have the same genetic insult as a boy, but not be diagnosed with autism,” Wigler says.
The scientists can’t explain why girls might be more protected. Some researchers have proposed that sex hormones or some unidentified effects of genes on the X chromosome may play a role. Boys have only one copy of the X chromosome, so a genetic aberration there may be particularly dangerous for them.
In one of the three studies, Wigler and his colleagues analyzed how genes in DNA regions that have duplications or deletions interact with one another. In girls, this massive network of interrelated genes requires a much stronger hit to go haywire. In boys, it is relatively easy to perturb the network. This same analysis also revealed that children with autism tended to have more duplications or deletions in gene regions involved in nerve cell communication compared with other functions.
One of the studies using the Simons Simplex Collection, coauthored by child psychiatrist and geneticist Matthew State of the Yale University School of Medicine and his colleagues, included 1,124 families and estimated 130 to 234 genome regions in which copy number changes were linked to autism. Wigler’s study, which looked at 887 families, put the number at 250 to 300.
Deletions and duplications of one particular region of chromosome 16 were the most commonly observed changes. But, as is typical for such a diverse disease, changes to this region still accounted for only slightly over 1 percent of autism cases.
The studies also found that having extra copies of DNA on a part of chromosome 7 may be tied to autism. Children completely lacking the same region of DNA have Williams syndrome, a disorder marked by hypersocial and friendly behavior. “That suggests that this one small region of the genome contains genetic information that is really fundamentally important in the development of social circuitry,” State says.
Scientists don’t yet know which particular genes located in this section of DNA, if any, are behind the behavioral changes seen in autism spectrum disorders. But figuring that out will be tremendously important for understanding how genes can control human behavior, State says.
Citations
S. Gilman et al. Rare de novo variants associated with autism implicate a large functional network of genes involved in formation and function of synapses. Neuron, Vol. 70, June 9, 2011. DOI 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.05.021
D. Levy et al. Rare De novo and transmitted copy-number variation in autistic spectrum disorders. Neuron, Vol. 70, June 9, 2011. DOI 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.05.015
Sanders et al. Multiple recurrent de novo copy-number variations, including duplications of 7q11.23 Williams-Beuren Syndrome region, are strongly autism associated, Neuron, Vol. 70, June 9, 2011. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.05.015
Christian P. Schaaf and Huda Y. Zoghbi. Solving the autism puzzle a few pieces at a time. Neuron, Vol. 70, June 9, 2011. DOI 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.05.025
Suggested Reading
B. Bower. Autism rates head up. Science News, Vol. 179, June 4, 2011, p. 16. Available online:
[Go to]
B. Bower. Autism immerses 2-year-olds in a synchronized world. Science News, Vol. 175, April 25, 2009, p. 8. Available online:
[Go to]
L. Sanders. Clues to autism's roots from brain study. Science News, Vol. 179, June 18, 2011, p. 5. Available online: [Go to]
Please alert Science News to any inappropriate posts by clicking the REPORT SPAM link within the post. Comments will be reviewed before posting.
I also cannot help but wonder is not the world one big spectrum of differences, neuro diversity and otherwise, and maybe autism is not a condition as such, because when we start to break down the many varied differences within the spectrum, mostly it seems to me anyway its the associated conditions that makes life difficult for many on the autism spectrum, the different type of intelligence is just the way some of us are. That cannot change and in fact the older I get my original differences flood back, as to difficult to pretend any more!
1. Is the category too broad?
and if not then
2. Are there adaptive benefits to fitting within that spectrum?
If the second, then perhaps the range itself can not be called a disorder. Maybe it os only a disorder when associated deficits outweigh benefits.
Again, if the second, then it pays to not only look at what has adaptive benefits in our current world but to look more deeply into what might have been useful features for many past generations.
There may be some very good reasons for such a high prevalence in the general population in such a situation. Many genetic variations are useful in certain situations but not in others.
Here is the meta analysis regarding copy number variations in CCL3L1 gene:
PLoS One. 2010 Dec 30;5(12):e15778.
CCL3L1 copy number variation and susceptibility to HIV-1 infection: a meta-analysis.
Liu S, Yao L, Ding D, Zhu H.
SourceThe State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, Institute of Genetics, School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Although several studies have investigated whether CCL3L1 copy number variation (CNV) influences the risk of HIV-1 infection, there are still no clear conclusions. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis using two models to generate a more robust estimate of the association between CCL3L1 CNV and susceptibility to HIV-1 infection.
METHODS: We divided the cases and controls into two parts as individuals with CCL3L1 gene copy number (GCN) above the population specific median copy number (PMN) and individuals with CCL3L1 GCN below PMN, respectively. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were given for the main analysis. We also conducted stratified analyses by ethnicity, age group and sample size. Relevant literatures were searched through PubMed and ISI Web of Knowledge up to March 2010.
RESULTS: In total, 9 studies with 2434 cases and 4029 controls were included. ORs for the main analysis were 1.35 (95% CI, 1.02-1.78, model: GCN ≤ PMN Vs. GCN > PMN) and 1.70 (95% CI, 1.30-2.23, model: GCN < PMN Vs. GCN ≥ PMN), respectively. Either in stratified analysis, statistically significant results can be detected in some subgroups.
CONCLUSIONS: Our analyses indicate that CCL3L1 CNV is associated with susceptibility to HIV-1 infection. A lower copy number is associated with an increased risk of HIV-1 infection, while a higher copy number is associated with reduced risk for acquiring HIV-1
Thanks for the thought provoking article.
You must register with Science News to add a comment. To log-in click here. To register as a new user, follow this link.