Beer bubble math | Science News

06|29|13 ISSUE

Contents
- Mystery Meteorite: The case for (and against) a rock from Mercury
- Hard Times for Theorists in a Post-Higgs World: The Large Hadron Collider’s big success leaves no clear avenue for new physics
- In the Eye of the Tiger: Global spread of Asian tiger mosquito could fuel outbreaks of tropical disease in temperate regions
subscribe
give a gift
renew
RSS Feeds
email alerts
Digital Edition
Podcast
Past issues

Read articles, including Science News stories written for ages 9-14, on the SNK website.

Contents
- Cool Jobs: Moved by life: Biologically inspired robots travel — naturally
- Infection time: Disease is more severe when it hits in the morning, at least in mice
- Explainer: Our bodies’ internal clocks: Biological clocks determine hunger, sleepiness and other daily rhythms

Home / Columns / Math Trek

Beer bubble math

By Julie Rehmeyer

Web edition: June 10, 2011

A+ A- Text Size

	The rate of change of bubble volume. If this quantity is positive, the bubble will grow; if it’s negative, it will shrink.
	A constant that depends on the temperature and the specific gas in the foam. (The foam on top of a glass of Guinness lasts unusually long because Guinness uses nitrogen in addition to carbon dioxide in its beer. K is smaller for nitrogen, so the bubbles change size more slowly.)
	The sum of the lengths of the edges of the surfaces where the bubble intersects other bubbles. For an isolated bubble, E is 0; for a big bubble surrounded by many little bubbles, it is large.
	Any plane one can imagine that cuts through the bubble.
	The shape made by the intersection of plane P with the bubble.
	The Euler characteristic of the shape P ∩ B.
	The symbol for integrating over planes, which allows you to essentially add up the Euler characteristics of every possible way you might slice the bubble.

Comment

Comments (8)

Please alert Science News to any inappropriate posts by clicking the REPORT SPAM link within the post. Comments will be reviewed before posting.

nd how many taxpayer dollars did it cost us for this bit of worthless information? Who gives a damn? Some scientists need to find something else to do if this is all we can expect from them.

Prentice Price

Jun. 13, 2011 at 4:17pm
That's how people reacted to the semiconductor..i.e., Why would anyone be interested in materials that neither conduct well or insulated well?

Frank Schieber

Jun. 13, 2011 at 4:42pm
Gee Prentice. I am guessing that you are not a scientist. But I will bet that you use the computer that these hairbrained scientists came up with. And I will bet that you are on your cellphone that those same scientists developed when you drive. Try not to knock what scientists do if your vantage point does not give you the proper perspective. Maybe take a remedial science class.

HansSkyboy

Jun. 13, 2011 at 7:35pm
Chances are, this equation is important in the manufacturing of foam-plastics and many other substances.
Pure science has brought us much amazing technology without knowing beforehand what use the information might be put to.

Greygoat

Jun. 14, 2011 at 10:46pm
So, you're saying it's alright for a scientist to spend hunderdes of thousands of dollars to go out and study a pile of dog poo just because he or she might find a use for it someday? It doesn't take a scientist to figure out where it came from. It doesn't take a mathmatician to figure out where it's going. It doesn't take a PHD to know what to do with it. It does take a little common scense to relize some scince is a farce. If you don"t think so then i've got a pile of manure i'd love to sell in the name of sciencs.

Prentice Price

Jun. 15, 2011 at 7:09pm
There is an implicit but unsupported assumption that discovering this equation cost vast sums of money.
There are further assumptions - on both sides - that the question is either irrelevant or valuable.
And there is a serious need for a spellchecker.
Tom

tom o'connor

Jun. 20, 2011 at 4:06pm
Seems like something any self-respecting mathematician would work out on a napkin just for the fun of it. Much more interesting than the Sports or Entertainment sections, anyway.

James Dohleman

Aug. 1, 2011 at 9:58am
That is fascinating that Guinness uses nitrogen! How cool that scientists understand the mathematical model for the bubble size and their duration. It may have interesting applications to understanding the "bends" which divers experience when they ascend rapidly to the ocean surface and bubbles form in their blood stream.

Aspen Logic

Jul. 10, 2012 at 9:22am

Registered readers are invited to post a comment. To encourage fruitful discussion, please keep your comments relevant, brief and courteous. Offensive, irrelevant, nonsensical and commercial posts will not be published. (All links will be removed from comments.)

You must register with Science News to add a comment. To log-in click here. To register as a new user, follow this link.

Follow @sciencenewsorg

features

MORE Features>>