Web edition: June 15, 2011
Print edition: July 16, 2011; Vol.180 #2 (p. 12)
Already sluggish, the sun may be slipping into several decades of hibernation that could exert a cooling effect on Earth’s climate, several new studies suggest.
During the last extended period of solar dormancy, from 1645 to 1715, Europe plunged into some of the coldest winters on record. But Earth’s atmosphere, which now contains an abundance of greenhouse gases, differs in composition compared with three centuries ago, and solar physicists say they’re unsure how a long solar hiatus would affect the planet’s 21st century climate.
It’s also possible that the beginning of the next 11-year solar cycle — which is marked by the emergence of dark blemishes called sunspots at high solar latitudes — may simply be delayed by a few years, rather than shut down for decades.
The scientists base their findings on multiple observations of the sun’s outer atmosphere, visible surface and the movement of magnetic fields inside the sun. The sun’s 11-year cycle is governed by flows of hot gas, or plasma, in the sun that transport parcels of the solar magnetic field.
Three teams presented their results June 14 during a press briefing at a meeting in Las Cruces, N.M., of the American Astronomical Society’s Solar Physics division.
The evidence “all indicates that the next solar cycle will be delayed by two to five years,” but that a longer break is possible, says Dean Pesnell of NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Md., who did not participate in the studies.
In one of the new studies, Frank Hill of the National Solar Observatory in Tucson and his colleagues used ground-based detectors to monitor changes in the solar surface due to the reverberation of sound waves inside the sun. These solar sonograms previously revealed an east-west flow of material deep inside the sun that presaged, years in advance, the onset of the last two solar cycles. But the flow marking the beginning of the next solar cycle, which the team expected to see in 2008 or 2009, still isn’t there. The flow’s absence “is leading us to believe that the next cycle may be very much more delayed, or may not happen at all,” Hill says.
In a second study, Richard Altrock, manager of the Air Force’s coronal research program at the National Solar Observatory in Sunspot, N.M., and his colleagues mapped the distribution of highly ionized iron atoms in the sun’s outer atmosphere. The distribution of these ions acts as a tracer for the movement of magnetic fields rooted in the sun.
Around the peak of a solar cycle, the magnetic field at the sun’s poles reverses direction, with the old field erased by the new, oppositely directed field. But the current delayed cycle may not be strong enough to fully erase the old field. The findings suggest that this cycle’s solar maximum, predicted to occur in 2013, may be weak or not occur at all, Altrock says.
A third study finds that the strength of the magnetic fields that produce sunspots has steadily declined over the past 13 years. If that decline continues, the fields will fall below the threshold required to support the cold gas in sunspots, and the familiar blemishes will all but disappear around 2022, notes study coauthor Matt Penn of the National Solar Observatory in Tucson.
Douglas Biesecker of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration in Boulder, Colo., says he’s skeptical that the studies indicate the sun will go on a full hiatus, especially because most of the observations only encompass the last few solar cycles, which have either been atypically weak or late in getting started.
Nonetheless, the findings have caught Biesecker and other researchers by surprise at an auspicious time, with an armada of sun-staring telescopes on the ground and in space poised to provide answers.
“It’s a great time to be a solar physicist,” says Pesnell.
Citations
R.C. Altrock. Whither goes cycle 24? A view from the Fe XIV corona. American Astronomical Society Solar Physics Division meeting, Las Cruces, N.M., June 13, 2011. Abstract available: [Go to]
F. Hill et al. Large-scale zonal flows during the solar minimum — Where is cycle 25? American Astronomical Society Solar Physics Division meeting, Las Cruces, N.M., June 13, 2011. Abstract available: [Go to]
W.C. Livingston, M. Penn and L. Svalgard. A Decade of diminishing sunspot vigor. American Astronomical Society Solar Physics Division meeting, Las Cruces, N.M., June 13, 2011. Abstract available: [Go to]
Suggested Reading
R. Cowen. Sun’s doldrums likely to last. Science News, Vol. 179, March 26, 2011, p. 5. Available online: [Go to]
R. Cowen. Magnetic flows cause sunspot lows, study shows. Science News, Vol. 177, April 10, 2010, p. 8. Available online: [Go to]
Please alert Science News to any inappropriate posts by clicking the REPORT SPAM link within the post. Comments will be reviewed before posting.
It appears that most of the mainstream news media (with a few exceptions) and even Scientific American have chosen to pretend this story doesn't exist. Yet it is an important news story which may have major significance. Its nice to know that we can count on Science News to give us the real story free of the politically correct self-censorship which seems to be the norm now days in other publications. Thank you for reporting this story.
No doubt, the AGW is the greatest mistake of the Science.
Dr Elsar A. Orkan
The AGW email "scandal" is old news, and all it really proves is that there are cheaters in all walks of life. It is too soon to pass judgement on the issue either way, so don't use this latest news as justification for flawed business and political policies. Instead, why not come on down to Texas and enjoy our new "cool" 100+ degree spring days.
Just because decreasing insolation might temporarily rescue us from dramatic increases in average earth ground-level temperatures does not mean that AGW is wrong.
Obviously there are other issues involved: Sun spot cycles cause fluctuations in the intensity of radiation from the sun. The Milankovitch cycles change the distance to the sun (basically). Also, there are all of those "earthly" phenomenon too (atmospheric dust cause by droughts and volcanos, greenhouse gas emission, etc.) that change behavior the Earth's atmosphere.
the statement that even INCLUDES CO2 is a distraction. CO2 is easily tracked and factored, but is the LEAST warming gas we release. this is a ploy by the chemical and petroleum manufacturers to ignore their other, highly dangerous, and magnitude higher waste and agricultural products.
the biggest danger, other than another mini-ice age,(helped along by global dimming), is another food crises.
my personal take on the Solar effects, is even more catastrophic. as seen in the latest CME of June 7, a big enough chunk of iron rich solar mass can easily be thrown out to make a Neptune class planet. If it forms in the elliptic, it is possible to see a grand scale impact event between the orbit of Earth and Sol, or an even more final impact event between the planet/protoplanet/asteroid/comet and ourselves.
The facts that we teach students about accretion disk theory have ALL foundered on the anvil of inquiry and physical examination.
Heck, we can't even figure out why the lithium/boron/beyllium/carbon levels are so far off.
In astrominerology, we have found that slmost EVERY single sample of everything we have from space has been heated to 1200c, frozen, mixed with liquid water, and coated with nanodiamonds.
the orbits of all the outer planets have all switched places, maybe more than once, and the chemical components of both the Kuiper Belt objects, and the Oort cloud appear to be made of the same materials. The Oort cloud is so far out there, that ALL the stars in our milky way could fit inside it's orbit. And it seems most of the matter out in the TNO's range are earth sized cored, Neptune sized objects.
There is no way of finessing the disk theory to make any of this happen.
ergo, the sun must be "calving" out planetary mass objects at least in the range of once a million years, to get anywhere near the amount of mass we are discovering out past Neptune.
We will see soon, Betelguese has a absolutely unreal, off balance, secondary core, that has been imaged with infrared, and it has grown and split in the last decade. We may be seeing our first instance of a binary system formation. (or even trinary, the heat signiture inside the photosphere has now split into two discreet sources).
If this actually happens soon, we may be able to see an interesting transformation of the H/R diagram, and maybe a change over to a plasma based universe at last....
You must register with Science News to add a comment. To log-in click here. To register as a new user, follow this link.