Quantcast
issue
Read articles, including Science News stories written for ages 9-14, on the SNK website.
Some comfort about broken CFLs
Mercury release rates are low, new data show, but can build to toxic levels if broken bulbs aren't cleaned up right away.
A+ A- Text Size

Mercury release rates are low, new data show, but can build to toxic levels if broken bulbs aren't cleaned up right away.

By Janet Raloff

Web edition: July 7, 2011

Enlarge
When this happens...
A CFL's swirly tubes are remarkably fragile. When broken, the mercury they'd held can offgas for months, a study finds.
iStockphoto

My night-owl daughter woke me in a panic at around 2 a.m., a couple of weeks back. While swatting at a fly, she’d just broken the compact fluorescent light illuminating her closet — one of those highly efficient CFLs I’d installed all over the house. She didn’t shatter the whole bulb, just a roughly 3-inch segment of the swirly glass, which (naturally) embedded in the fibers of her carpet. Having heard me warn endlessly of how we should be careful in handling these bulbs — since they contain mercury — she wanted to know what kind of damage control was called for.

I only wish I knew then what I do now. It wouldn’t have changed how we cleaned up the mess, but we would have slept a bit better that night.

New data from Yadong Li and Li Jin of Jackson State University in Mississippi help put concerns about mercury from broken bulbs in perspective. They measured the mercury present in both new and used CFLs and recorded the continuous emissions from ones that they intentionally broke.

Airborne release rates following a break were low, they reported online July 6 in Environmental Engineering Science.  A 13-watt lamp (which has a light output equivalent to a 60-watt incandescent bulb) released from 0.04 to perhaps 0.7 milligrams of mercury during the first 24 hours. This suggests that exposures should be negligible if the pieces are immediately picked up, nestled in paper and then discarded in a zip-it-up plastic bag or a sealed glass jar. To play it safe, the authors recommend also ventilating the room so that any residual gas shed by missed shards of glass won’t accumulate.

And that’s what we did with our broken CFL. Picked up every visible piece of glass, wrapped it carefully and stowed it on the porch until it could be taken down to the trash can the next day. We also vacuumed the carpet for about 10 minutes to pick up glass pieces too small to see — and immediately discarded the vacuum’s bag as well.

Keep in mind, Li notes, a CFL's elemental mercury is not in vapor form unless the lamp is on with a current running through it. Otherwise, the mercury resides along the inside of the glass. And it's from there that the mercury will slowly volatilize once exposed to air. So another lesson: Breaking a CFL while it's turned on can initially disperse a bigger puff of mercury vapor into the air than if its glass is damaged while the bulb is off, Li says.

A more disturbing finding was how long a broken CFL can continue to release toxic vapors: a minimum of 43 days (which is how long Li and Jin ran their tests with bulbs from three different manufacturers). The engineers computed how much of each bulb’s starting mercury had been lost during that time (which wasn’t easy, since starting values and release rates both varied broadly between bulbs). Their calculations indicate that each CFL still contained enough residual elemental mercury at the end of their testing to continue releasing the toxic substance into the air for at least 10 more days, and in one instance, for 85 more days.

If not cleaned up, the bulb with the largest initial store of mercury could have spewed 1 milligram of the toxic metal into a room's air within 25 days; another could have reached that level within about 40 days. Li and Jin cited data by others indicating that the release of 1 milligram of mercury vapor into a 500 cubic meter room can yield air concentrations 10 times the current recommended limit for a child. Breaking a CFL can thus cause potentially toxic levels of pollution to develop, Li and Jin conclude.

Other interesting factoids from their paper:

  • — The mercury in a bulb undergoes chemical changes over time as it’s used, rendering it less toxic. Explains Li, the mercury oxidizes, turning it into a solid that will not volatilize. Therefore, an unused bulb poses a significantly bigger pollution risk than is one near the end of its life.
  • — Bulbs produced by the major manufacturers since 2008 meet or far exceed the mercury-reduction goal set by the National Electric Manufacturers Association of 5 milligrams per CFL for lamps 25 watts or lower. In fact, most bulbs had less than 2.5 milligrams.
  • — For the most popular, 13-watt CFLs, mercury concentrations varied dramatically between brands, from 0.17 to 3.6 milligrams.

The Environmental Protection Agency offers consumers guidance on how to deal with cleaning up a broken CFL. It also recommends something that we should have thought about: Don’t use these lights where they will be unprotected. Like the ceiling fixture in my daughter’s closet. What EPA failed to add: Consumers should ignore any pest that flies within swatting distance of a CFL.

Comment
Print Friendly and PDF

Y. Li and L. Jin. Environmental release of mercury from broken compact fluorescent lamps. Environmental Engineering Science, Vol. 28, published online July 5, 2011. doi: 10.1089/ees.2011.0027 [Go to]

EPA. Cleaning Up a Broken CFL. [Go to]


J. Raloff. Oops! A Fluorescent Light Breaks. Science News blog, Oct. 2, 2008. [Go to]

J. Raloff. Fluorescent bulbs offer mercury advantage. Science News blog, Oct. 1, 2008. [Go to]

J. Raloff. Trapping Compact Fluorescents’ Toxic Gas, Science News blog, Oct. 2, 2008. [Go to]

J. Raloff. Landfills make mercury more toxic. Science News, Vol. 160, July 7, 2001, p. 4. Available to subscribers: [Go to]

Comments (12)

Please alert Science News to any inappropriate posts by clicking the REPORT SPAM link within the post. Comments will be reviewed before posting.

  • The Electrical Code may disallow incandescent lights in closets too - people stack stuff in closets and anything that touches the bulb can be a fire hazard.

    However, incandescents are being phased out, stock up now!
    Ric Werme Ric Werme
    Jul. 8, 2011 at 9:49am
  • Oh for crying out loud. This article has to be the epitome of something very strange, innocent, but still strange. Yes, CFLs have some mercury in them. Yes, one should use REASONABLE precautions in cleaning up a broken CFL. Big deal. Our society has been cleaning up broken fluorescent tubes for decades and those tubes have contained far more mercury than do cfls today. But the lack of historical context is not my big complaint about this article. My big complaint has to do with my fear that Science News might do more of this sort of thing -- substituting warning label content for science news! Please, say it isn't so!
    Steve Gregorich Steve Gregorich
    Jul. 8, 2011 at 9:49am
  • Points for consideration: First, this story assumes that everyone not only has a little plastic bag available to hold a broken bulb, but a glass jar as well. Second, although the vacuuming took place for 10 minutes to make sure every little piece was cleaned up, the story fails to note that the vacuum cleaner cycles the air in and out of its motor, so those loose particles probably were being freely circulated quite well in the air during that 10 minutes; and, finally, telling people not to swat at insects around one of these light bulbs is never going to work because the place where insects, specifically flies, are going to be drawn to is the light source and, hence, if someone's trying to get rid of that fly, they're going to swat in that direction. It's time to admit that CFL light bulbs are just plain bad for us. The trade-off -- mercury poisoning for a few carbon credits -- isn't worth it to me. That's why I've removed all my CFLs and replaced them with the old bulbs, and have been stockpiling the old ones every time I go to the store.
    Cindy Olmstead Cindy Olmstead
    Jul. 8, 2011 at 9:49am
  • The real problem with CFLs is in the one sentence.
    "I put it in a zip lock bag, stored it on the porch until it could be taken down TO THE TRASH the next day." O.M.G., get it, in THE TRASH.
    ...and so does everyone else, bad, bad, bad.
    asmartld asmartld
    Jul. 8, 2011 at 12:30pm
  • So, because in rare cases, a CFL MIGHT be bad for a small number of people due to released mercury from a broken bulb, they're bad for everyone all the time. Never mind that they're better for the environment overall than incandescents, better for a household's economy by costing less overall, and remain unbroken 99.999999% of the time. But because they're not perfect, they're horrible. Does that make any sense?
    The article and perhaps the report fails to address a couple of points. First, it seems to assume the mercury released into the air will stay in the room where the bulb was. But that air is going to circulate thanks to normal air flow, air conditioning, etc. That will reduce the amount of mercury in that one room while admittedly spreading it elsewhere (including outside), but at lower densities. Second, the article does not clearly address whether the mercury will remain airborne or could settle onto surfaces which, depending on the surface, could be good or bad. Clearly there's more to know here.
    Ross Lampert Ross Lampert
    Jul. 8, 2011 at 1:18pm
  • I'm with Ms. Olmstead - stock up on incandescent bulbs while you still can.

    Have any studies been done on the true impact of CFLs? With all of the toxic chemicals, plastic parts, and electronic components, I'd bet that a CFL bulb is probably worse for the environment than a standard bulb, even taking into account the extra electricity required to power the standard bulb. After all, plastic = oil. Think of all the harsh chemicals used to manufacture electronic components, and of course the poisonous mercury, and you should really be wondering why CFLs aren't illegal. At what point do we snap out of this nonsense and leapfrog over CFLs directly to LED bulbs?

    Oh, I almost forgot to mention another potential dirty little secret about CFLs. At least in my personal experience, I have seen no increase in lightbulb life expectancy. CFLs burn out just as fast as regular bulbs.

    So to sum it up:
    Compared to standard bulbs, CFLs cost more, hardly last any longer, use dangerous chemicals and manufactiring processes, are difficult to dispose of, and probably do as much if not more harm to the environment.

    A little tidbit for you diehard CFL-lovers:
    I have a photography darkroom lightbulb that glows a beautiful subtle amber. It is approximately 45 years old.
    Dr. Momus A. Morgus Dr. Momus A. Morgus
    Jul. 8, 2011 at 1:18pm
  • "the bulb with the largest initial store of mercury could have spewed 1 milligram of the toxic metal into a room's air within 25 days"

    "the release of 1 milligram of mercury vapor into a 500 cubic meter room can yield air concentrations 10 times the current recommended limit for a child. "

    Ten times the limit over a period of 25 days means 10/25 = 0.4 limit exposures per day. If the room air were entirely uncirculated, there could be a problem. Under more typical circumstances, that one bulb might put part of such a room close to the limit for about a month.

    The practical conclusion? Just what this article says: clean it up, but don't fret over it.

    A more abstract lesson is that every artifact of civilization has its cost in degradation of our environment. That is one of those disturbing facts of life we all wish would just go away, but it is as true of our sewage as of our light bulbs.

    In a limited world, every critter, from fruit fly to human, messes up its environment in various ways. The long-term result is to limit the population of each type of critter. How will that happen? In many small ways, including, apparently, a certain amount of mercury poisoning. Personally I prefer birth control, but the job will get done one way or another.
    Ralph Dratman Ralph Dratman
    Jul. 8, 2011 at 1:18pm
  • When weighing the environmental impact of incandescent bulbs compared to CFLs, don't forget to include the mercury put into the atmosphere by coal-burning power plants.
    Douglas Johnson Douglas Johnson
    Jul. 9, 2011 at 6:58pm
  • Besides the problems mentioned by Dr Morgus, there is the disposal problem. We are supposed to return used CFLs to a approved recycling facility, but I suspect 99% of them will end up in trash and landfills.

    CFLs have notoriously short life spans when used for brief on/off intervals of a few minutes. I've replaced several CFLs that probably had less than a thousand hours use.

    I've also had 2 CFLs' electronics overheat until the base was smoking and charred. The smoke must have been laden with toxic compounds from the burning plastic.

    I'm sure the lighting manufacturers would rather sell CFLs at full list of $5-$10/bulb rather than a 4 pack of incandescents for $2.00.
    MJE MJE
    Jul. 11, 2011 at 9:51am
  • I had a house with regular fluorescent fixtures in the closets. Guess what? The constant on-off on-off killed the ballasts. After a while I got tired of buying ballasts, so I replaced the fluorescent fixtures with incandescent fixtures. The bulbs lasted for years (maybe still are.)and my electrical bill remained the same. Fluorescent lights only work well when on for long periods of time. They don't work in places like closets and hallways where lights are only on briefly. In a walk-in freezer, the user will be long gone by the time the bulb warms enough to light. Also folks will have to remove their dimmers, including those in ceiling fans to make the bulbs safe. I have 3 lamps that take 3-way bulbs with 3 different shade attachment systems. 3-way CFLs won't fit in any of them. We must refer to Jenkinsen's rule: "It Won't Work."

    The Mexican Cartels will simply add Incandescent bulbs to their smuggling activities.

    Maybe we can use Yucca Mountain to store spent CFls

    Remember the incandescent light was invented by a genius, and the CFL by a committee.
    Paul Etzler Paul Etzler
    Jul. 11, 2011 at 9:51am
  • The other dirty little secret about CFLs, and all fluorescent bulbs for that matter, is that they emit short-wave ultraviolet light. Gee, I wonder if any studies have been done on the effects of low-levels of short-wave ultraviolet radiation on humans, especially the eyes and skin, that are exposed for years, even decades. I'm betting that we'd see an increased risk for cataracts and skin cancers. All this to save a few pennies' worth of electricity on a lousy lightbulb?! The better idea is to move away from coal and toward wind, solar, etc. Forget lightbulbs and concentrate on what really matters - clean energy.
    Dr. Momus A. Morgus Dr. Momus A. Morgus
    Jul. 13, 2011 at 10:05am
  • Austar is managing by Chinese, it adopts Singapore and European advanced technology and management experience, combines with local actual situations, in particular hearing aids enterprise operators, dealers, and users commonly own a Chinese traditional culture, to operate in a long-termvision
    austar austar austar austar
    Aug. 2, 2011 at 9:14am
Registered readers are invited to post a comment. To encourage fruitful discussion, please keep your comments relevant, brief and courteous. Offensive, irrelevant, nonsensical and commercial posts will not be published. (All links will be removed from comments.)

You must register with Science News to add a comment. To log-in click here. To register as a new user, follow this link.

Follow Us