Web edition: July 7, 2011
My night-owl daughter woke me in a panic at around 2 a.m., a couple of weeks back. While swatting at a fly, she’d just broken the compact fluorescent light illuminating her closet — one of those highly efficient CFLs I’d installed all over the house. She didn’t shatter the whole bulb, just a roughly 3-inch segment of the swirly glass, which (naturally) embedded in the fibers of her carpet. Having heard me warn endlessly of how we should be careful in handling these bulbs — since they contain mercury — she wanted to know what kind of damage control was called for.
I only wish I knew then what I do now. It wouldn’t have changed how we cleaned up the mess, but we would have slept a bit better that night.
New data from Yadong Li and Li Jin of Jackson State University in Mississippi help put concerns about mercury from broken bulbs in perspective. They measured the mercury present in both new and used CFLs and recorded the continuous emissions from ones that they intentionally broke.
Airborne release rates following a break were low, they reported online July 6 in Environmental Engineering Science. A 13-watt lamp (which has a light output equivalent to a 60-watt incandescent bulb) released from 0.04 to perhaps 0.7 milligrams of mercury during the first 24 hours. This suggests that exposures should be negligible if the pieces are immediately picked up, nestled in paper and then discarded in a zip-it-up plastic bag or a sealed glass jar. To play it safe, the authors recommend also ventilating the room so that any residual gas shed by missed shards of glass won’t accumulate.
And that’s what we did with our broken CFL. Picked up every visible piece of glass, wrapped it carefully and stowed it on the porch until it could be taken down to the trash can the next day. We also vacuumed the carpet for about 10 minutes to pick up glass pieces too small to see — and immediately discarded the vacuum’s bag as well.
Keep in mind, Li notes, a CFL's elemental mercury is not in vapor form unless the lamp is on with a current running through it. Otherwise, the mercury resides along the inside of the glass. And it's from there that the mercury will slowly volatilize once exposed to air. So another lesson: Breaking a CFL while it's turned on can initially disperse a bigger puff of mercury vapor into the air than if its glass is damaged while the bulb is off, Li says.
A more disturbing finding was how long a broken CFL can continue to release toxic vapors: a minimum of 43 days (which is how long Li and Jin ran their tests with bulbs from three different manufacturers). The engineers computed how much of each bulb’s starting mercury had been lost during that time (which wasn’t easy, since starting values and release rates both varied broadly between bulbs). Their calculations indicate that each CFL still contained enough residual elemental mercury at the end of their testing to continue releasing the toxic substance into the air for at least 10 more days, and in one instance, for 85 more days.
If not cleaned up, the bulb with the largest initial store of mercury could have spewed 1 milligram of the toxic metal into a room's air within 25 days; another could have reached that level within about 40 days. Li and Jin cited data by others indicating that the release of 1 milligram of mercury vapor into a 500 cubic meter room can yield air concentrations 10 times the current recommended limit for a child. Breaking a CFL can thus cause potentially toxic levels of pollution to develop, Li and Jin conclude.
Other interesting factoids from their paper:
The Environmental Protection Agency offers consumers guidance on how to deal with cleaning up a broken CFL. It also recommends something that we should have thought about: Don’t use these lights where they will be unprotected. Like the ceiling fixture in my daughter’s closet. What EPA failed to add: Consumers should ignore any pest that flies within swatting distance of a CFL.
Citations
Y. Li and L. Jin. Environmental release of mercury from broken compact fluorescent lamps. Environmental Engineering Science, Vol. 28, published online July 5, 2011. doi: 10.1089/ees.2011.0027 [Go to]
EPA. Cleaning Up a Broken CFL. [Go to]
Suggested Reading
J. Raloff. Oops! A Fluorescent Light Breaks. Science News blog, Oct. 2, 2008. [Go to]
J. Raloff. Fluorescent bulbs offer mercury advantage. Science News blog, Oct. 1, 2008. [Go to]
J. Raloff. Trapping Compact Fluorescents’ Toxic Gas, Science News blog, Oct. 2, 2008. [Go to]
J. Raloff. Landfills make mercury more toxic. Science News, Vol. 160, July 7, 2001, p. 4. Available to subscribers: [Go to]
Please alert Science News to any inappropriate posts by clicking the REPORT SPAM link within the post. Comments will be reviewed before posting.
However, incandescents are being phased out, stock up now!
"I put it in a zip lock bag, stored it on the porch until it could be taken down TO THE TRASH the next day." O.M.G., get it, in THE TRASH.
...and so does everyone else, bad, bad, bad.
The article and perhaps the report fails to address a couple of points. First, it seems to assume the mercury released into the air will stay in the room where the bulb was. But that air is going to circulate thanks to normal air flow, air conditioning, etc. That will reduce the amount of mercury in that one room while admittedly spreading it elsewhere (including outside), but at lower densities. Second, the article does not clearly address whether the mercury will remain airborne or could settle onto surfaces which, depending on the surface, could be good or bad. Clearly there's more to know here.
Have any studies been done on the true impact of CFLs? With all of the toxic chemicals, plastic parts, and electronic components, I'd bet that a CFL bulb is probably worse for the environment than a standard bulb, even taking into account the extra electricity required to power the standard bulb. After all, plastic = oil. Think of all the harsh chemicals used to manufacture electronic components, and of course the poisonous mercury, and you should really be wondering why CFLs aren't illegal. At what point do we snap out of this nonsense and leapfrog over CFLs directly to LED bulbs?
Oh, I almost forgot to mention another potential dirty little secret about CFLs. At least in my personal experience, I have seen no increase in lightbulb life expectancy. CFLs burn out just as fast as regular bulbs.
So to sum it up:
Compared to standard bulbs, CFLs cost more, hardly last any longer, use dangerous chemicals and manufactiring processes, are difficult to dispose of, and probably do as much if not more harm to the environment.
A little tidbit for you diehard CFL-lovers:
I have a photography darkroom lightbulb that glows a beautiful subtle amber. It is approximately 45 years old.
"the release of 1 milligram of mercury vapor into a 500 cubic meter room can yield air concentrations 10 times the current recommended limit for a child. "
Ten times the limit over a period of 25 days means 10/25 = 0.4 limit exposures per day. If the room air were entirely uncirculated, there could be a problem. Under more typical circumstances, that one bulb might put part of such a room close to the limit for about a month.
The practical conclusion? Just what this article says: clean it up, but don't fret over it.
A more abstract lesson is that every artifact of civilization has its cost in degradation of our environment. That is one of those disturbing facts of life we all wish would just go away, but it is as true of our sewage as of our light bulbs.
In a limited world, every critter, from fruit fly to human, messes up its environment in various ways. The long-term result is to limit the population of each type of critter. How will that happen? In many small ways, including, apparently, a certain amount of mercury poisoning. Personally I prefer birth control, but the job will get done one way or another.
CFLs have notoriously short life spans when used for brief on/off intervals of a few minutes. I've replaced several CFLs that probably had less than a thousand hours use.
I've also had 2 CFLs' electronics overheat until the base was smoking and charred. The smoke must have been laden with toxic compounds from the burning plastic.
I'm sure the lighting manufacturers would rather sell CFLs at full list of $5-$10/bulb rather than a 4 pack of incandescents for $2.00.
The Mexican Cartels will simply add Incandescent bulbs to their smuggling activities.
Maybe we can use Yucca Mountain to store spent CFls
Remember the incandescent light was invented by a genius, and the CFL by a committee.
You must register with Science News to add a comment. To log-in click here. To register as a new user, follow this link.