Quantcast
issue
Read articles, including Science News stories written for ages 9-14, on the SNK website.
A cloak in time
Physicists hide lab events for trillionths of a second
A+ A- Text Size

Physicists hide lab events for trillionths of a second

By Devin Powell

Web edition: July 14, 2011
Print edition: August 13, 2011; Vol.180 #4 (p. 12)

In his final battle against evil on the big screen, Harry Potter could have used a newfound type of cloak: one that hides not objects in space, but events in time.

Like filmmakers cutting together a movie, physicists have found a way to temporarily tear a hole in a beam of light. Events that occur during a brief period of time remain unseen, as does the hole itself.

Moti Fridman and colleagues at Cornell University report the first experimental demonstration of such “temporal cloaking” online July 11 at arXiv.org.

While this trick won't be hiding bank robbers from security cameras anytime soon, it could find its way into optical and electronic devices.

Previous invisibility cloaks hid objects from view by bending light. Just as water flows around a rock in the middle of a river, light waves curve around a cloak and rejoin perfectly on the other side, leaving no trace of their detour.

A time cloak conceals an event by changing light's speed, not its direction. With the speed of light capped at 299,792,458 meters per second, this trick works only when light travels slower than it would in a vacuum — such as through fiber-optic cables.

The Cornell team, who declined an interview pending the paper's publication, manipulated light in a fiber-optic cable using a time lens, a silicon device originally developed to speed up data transfer. Some of the light passing through this lens speeds up, and some slows down. The waves divide, Moses-style, creating a gap of darkness. A second lens farther along the cable then stitches the light back together so that it arrives at its destination intact, with no record of a hole — or anything that happened during this brief window of opportunity.

This hole lasted for 15 trillionths of a second, long enough to conceal pulses of light created inside the cloak, the researchers write. A longer cable could, in theory, increase this time gap to more than a microsecond. Longer than that, imperfections in the technique would grow large enough to reveal the presence of the gap.

“This is a much bigger time gap than we were thinking would be possible,” says Paul Kinsler, a physicist at Imperial College London.

Kinsler and his colleagues first described the idea of a time cloak in a paper published in the February Journal of Optics. Their perfectly undetectable time cloak required exotic metamaterials, manmade structures used in traditional invisibility cloaks.

“You would need metamaterials that change their properties in time as well as space,” says team member Martin McCall, also at Imperial College London. “It's currently beyond metamaterial technology to produce that ideal situation.”

The imperfect Cornell cloak, which is not made of metamaterials, may be useful for signal processing. It could, in theory, interrupt one data stream, allow another to be processed and then reconstitute the original signal for a detector that would be unaware of the interruption.

Larger time gaps on everyday scales, though, are unlikely. Even with a theoretically perfect metamaterial cloak, a mere eight-minute gap would require a device the size of the solar system, McCall estimates.

Comment
Print Friendly and PDF

M. Fridman et al. Demonstration of temporal cloaking. arXiv:1107.2062v1. Posted July 11, 2011. [Go to]

M.W. McCall et al. A spacetime cloak, or a history editor. Journal of Optics. Vol. 13, February 2011, 024003. doi:10.1088/2040-8978/13/2/024003. [Go to]


M. McCall and P. Kinsler. Cloaking space-time. Physics World. July 7, 2011. [Go to]

C. Petit. Invisibility uncloaked. Science News. Vol. 176, November 21, 2009, p. 18. Available online: [Go to]

Comments (7)

Please alert Science News to any inappropriate posts by clicking the REPORT SPAM link within the post. Comments will be reviewed before posting.

  • NOT that this would fool a security camera or much else, but if the rate of the gap was pulsed, wouldn't the human eye fail to "see" it below about 1/24 of a second?

    I'm thinking back when they tried subliminal advertising in theaters and flashed a frame during a movie that said, "You are hungrey" or "You are thirsty".

    Taking the opposite, if the cloak was pulsed at about a 94% of a second "duty cylce" we would fail to consciously perceive someone in front of us. And I am assuming the wearer was not moving. Any movement would only amplify a variant on "judder" as film to video studder is referred to. And guess what? It makes people look like they have suddenly moved rather than fluidly walked or the camera has panned incorrectly.

    I'm guessing a pulsed cloak of .94 seconds would have a metamaterial bill of materials resulting in a device smaller than our solar system, vs. attempting an 8-minute gap. But I don't know if increasing the gap duration results in a linear or exponential increase in the size of the cloak.
    Savage1701 Savage1701
    Jul. 15, 2011 at 10:50am
  • A 'device' is by definition "a fabrication", or assigned value to something/condition used for assigned purpose. A 'condition' as large as a solar system could fit into a supergravity object, or a wormhole...which need not be so 'large' as a solar system though it may contain conditions on par with scales normally attached to a solar system.

    TikkumOlam TikkumOlam
    Jul. 18, 2011 at 9:24am
  • There are correlaries to wormholes that have been made with sound. Use a meta-object with effect on par with the desired condition to produce the 'dark space' in the photon stream flow. Supermagnets might do the trick, or a particle acccelerator.
    TikkumOlam TikkumOlam
    Jul. 18, 2011 at 9:24am
  • Well, you could probably recycle the light in a fiber and add overlapping consequtive gaps, albeit with a lag time. You would probably have to amplify the signal to compensate for loss too.

    But pulsing wouldn't help prolong the gap much, since you can't synchronize with the brain "frame rate" (in as much as it is stable) nor avoid having some of the scene viewed.
    Torbjörn Larsson, OM Torbjörn Larsson, OM
    Jul. 18, 2011 at 9:24am
  • My comment is a bit off-topic, but the speed of light is an issue I've been wrestling with for some time now...

    Since we know that light can be slowed down, and we know that space is not a perfect vacuum (especially near stars, black holes, etc.), how can we possibly make accurate predictions if those predictions assume that light travels at a constant speed? Wouldn't the Hubble red-shifts be affected by a lower light speed? If they are, then any ages calculated from those red-shifts will be off. What if the apparent increase in the rate of expansion in the universe was just an artifact from light finally catching up with the initial bubble and then passing through it, and that rather than speeding up, we are returning to a "normal" rate of expansion? I think it's safe to say that the universe did not expand faster than the speed of light for most of the last 14 billion years. If it did, then we have an even bigger issue to discuss.
    Dr. Momus A. Morgus Dr. Momus A. Morgus
    Jul. 18, 2011 at 9:25am
  • i want to buy one :D
    richard maycry richard maycry
    Jul. 18, 2011 at 9:25am
  • have they tried to introduce frequencies in the gap or surrounding? or slow down the frequencies of the gap itself or light? or accelerate frequencies?
    Anthony Daniel Anthony Daniel
    Jul. 20, 2011 at 3:33pm
Registered readers are invited to post a comment. To encourage fruitful discussion, please keep your comments relevant, brief and courteous. Offensive, irrelevant, nonsensical and commercial posts will not be published. (All links will be removed from comments.)

You must register with Science News to add a comment. To log-in click here. To register as a new user, follow this link.

Follow Us