Quantcast
issue
Read articles, including Science News stories written for ages 9-14, on the SNK website.
Quantum theory gets physical
New work finds physical basis for quantum mechanics
A+ A- Text Size

New work finds physical basis for quantum mechanics

By Devin Powell

Web edition: July 19, 2011
Print edition: August 13, 2011; Vol.180 #4 (p. 12)

Physicists in Canada and Italy have derived quantum mechanics from physical principles related to the storage, manipulation and retrieval of information.

The new work is a step in a long, ongoing effort to find fundamental physical motivation for the math of quantum physics, which describes processes in the atomic and subatomic realms with unerring accuracy but defies commonsense understanding.

“We’d like to have a set of axioms that give us a little better physical understanding of quantum mechanics,” says Michael Westmoreland, a mathematician at Denison University in Granville, Ohio.

Quantum theory’s foundations currently rest on abstract mathematical formulations known as Hilbert spaces and C* algebras. These abstractions work well for calculating the probability of a particular outcome in an experiment. But they lack the intuitive physical meaning that physicists crave — the elegance of Einstein’s theory of special relativity, for instance, which says that the speed of light is constant and that laws of physics don’t change from one reference frame to the next.

Giulio Chiribella, a theoretical physicist at the Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics in Ontario, Canada, and colleagues based their approach on a postulate called “purification.” A system with uncertain properties (a “mixed state”) is always part of a larger “pure state” that can, in principle, be completely known, the team proposes in the July Physical Review A.

Consider the pion. This particle, which has a spin of zero, can decay into two spinning photons. Each single photon is in a mixed state – it has an equal chance of spinning up or down. The pair of photons together, though, comprise a pure state in which they must always spin in opposite directions.

“We can be ignorant of the part, but we can have maximal knowledge of the whole,” says Chiribella.

This purification principle requires the quantum phenomenon known as entanglement, which connects the parts to the whole. It also explains why quantum information can’t be copied without destroying it but can be “teleported” — replicated at a distant location after being destroyed at its point of origin.

Building on this principle, Chiribella and colleagues reproduced the mathematical structure of quantum mechanics with the aid of five additional axioms related to information processing. Their axioms include causality,  the idea that a measurement now can’t be influenced by future measurements, and “ideal compression,” meaning that information can be encoded in a physical system and then decoded without error. Other axioms involve the ability to distinguish states from each other and the ability of measurements to create pure states.

“They nail it,” says Christopher Fuchs, a theoretical physicist at the Perimeter Institute. “This now approaches something that I think is along the lines of trying to find a crisp physical principle.”

Whether this new derivation of quantum theory will prove to the simplest and most physically meaningful remains to be seen.

“What is simple or physically plausible is a matter of taste,” says Časlav Brukner, a physicist at the University of Vienna in Austria who has developed an alternative set of axioms. 

Some speculate that recasting quantum theory in terms of information could help to solve outstanding problems in physics, such as how to unify quantum mechanics and gravity.

“If you have lots of formulations of the same theory, you’re more likely to have one that leads to whatever the next physics is,” says Ben Schumacher, a theoretical physicist at Kenyon College in Gambier, Ohio.

Comment
Print Friendly and PDF

G. Chiribella, G.M. D’Ariano and P. Perinotti. Informational derivation of quantum theory. Physical Review A. Vol. 84, July 2011, p. 012311-1. doi:10.1103/PhysrevA.84.012311. [Go to]


C. Brukner. Questioning the rules of the game. Physics. Published online July 11, 2011. doi:10.1103/Physics.4.55. [Go to]

L. Hardy. Quantum theory from five reasonable axioms. arXiv:quant-ph/0101012v4. Posted Sep. 25, 2001. [Go to]

B. Dakić and C. Brukner. Quantum theory and beyond: Is entanglement special? arXiv:0911.0695v1. Posted Nov. 3, 2009. [Go to]

Comments (10)

Please alert Science News to any inappropriate posts by clicking the REPORT SPAM link within the post. Comments will be reviewed before posting.

  • I'm surprised to learn that some form of causality is a postulate. I was under the impression that causality had necessarily been abandoned at the quantum level after the successes of the Schrodinger / De Broglie wave picture.
    Ralph Dratman Ralph Dratman
    Jul. 20, 2011 at 3:33pm
  • The axioms underpinning this team's work are an exciting and IMO: quite overdue return to core philosophical principles of science. When the long-sought "New Copernican Model" is developed, it will be recognized to substantially adhere to these axioms, as did the original, 500 years ago.
    Buck Field Buck Field
    Jul. 20, 2011 at 3:33pm
  • Is this connected in any way to Verlinde's work on the entropic basis of physical law?
    Warren Funk Warren Funk
    Jul. 20, 2011 at 3:33pm
  • This has been done before, by Hardy, out of mere probability models. 1D classical probability gives you classical mechanics, "2D" (actually 3D with 2 axes) qubit probability gives you quantum mechanics.

    "Whether this new derivation of quantum theory will prove to the simplest and most physically meaningful remains to be seen."

    And Hardy's approach is simpler too, as this Physics A review reminds us.

    Instead the key is that different toy models illustrate the underlying physics differently.

    @ Ralph Dratman:

    That is confused, I believe. Quantum mechanics (QM) is causal of course. Otherwise physics, especially relativity, would break down!

    Other confusions about this is on determinism. QM is deterministic in how it advances states. Its stochasticity comes in when we do observations. (But it is still a causal observation process, observation before having observables.)

    Also often confused is on discreteness. QM combines continuous states (energy bands) in unbounded systems (say free electrons) with discrete states (energy levels) in bounded systems (say electrons in atoms).

    [At least, that is the picture in a classical perspective.

    However as Hardy's results point out it is actually _classical mechanics which is discrete_ in its demand for probabilities of separate "in" states and "out" states, while quantum mechanics axiomatics demand a continuous transformation between states. See the link above for refs.]
    Torbjörn Larsson, OM Torbjörn Larsson, OM
    Jul. 21, 2011 at 9:57am
  • Oops, my previous comment [in moderation as I post] lacks the Phys A link, apparently urls are not permitted. The article is Physics 4, 55 (2011) DOI: 10.1103/Physics.4.55, "Questioning the rules of the game", Časlav Brukner.
    Torbjörn Larsson, OM Torbjörn Larsson, OM
    Jul. 21, 2011 at 9:57am

  • We all want progress, But if your on the wrong road, Progress means doing an about-turn and walking back to the right road; In that case, the man who turns back soonest is the most progressive . ; C.S. Lewis

    Secret of mass states the atom is a life form and endowed with gravity.
    Google secret of mass Ron Alvarez
    Ron808 Ron808
    Jul. 26, 2011 at 9:08am
  • Essence Of Quantum Mechanics

    The universe, and life within it, are not just conglomerations of mechanisms. The universe, and life within it, have come into being by the nature of energy-mass dualism, and their whence and whither are governed by this dualism. The genesis and, most probable cyclic, existence of the universe are governed by the energy-mass relationship.

    Energy-mass relationship governs also the routes, the mechanisms, of cosmic and life evolutions.

    Mechanisms do not set-determine the classical physics fate states. Mechanisms are routes of evolution between classical physics fate states. Quantum mechanics are mechanisms, probable, possible and actual mechanisms of getting from one to other classical physics states WITHIN the expanse from cosmic singularity to the maximum expanded universe and back to singularity states.

    The universe is the archetype of quantum within classical physics. This is the fractal oneness of the universe. Astronomically there are two physics. A classical Newtonian physics behavior, including expansion acceleration, of and between galactic clusters, and a quantum physics behavior WITHIN the galactic clusters that now feeds the expansion.

    Dov Henis
    (Comments From The 22nd Century)
    Evolution, Natural Selection, Derive From Cosmic Expansion



    Dov Henis Dov Henis
    Jul. 26, 2011 at 9:09am
  • Einstein's concept about the speed of light being a constant is inconsistent with itself.
    curt weinstein curt weinstein
    Aug. 1, 2011 at 9:58am
  • That nice seeing thst Higgs Boson is a failure by CERN ADMISSIONNEWSNIGHT REPORT UK AUG2011)ie.There will be no more casework based on the philsophers principle known of late as TranscendentalIdealism.This infers a mathematical object can be both an invention of mind and a discovery in metrological terms.Group logic is now the key so better luck for the subject hereon.Congrats from Sussex UK
    grafspey grafspey
    Aug. 25, 2011 at 9:14am
  • To Those that are trying to understand the Physical of QM,the answer is in front of you when you were goggles to se 3D,what you see through those glasses is the physical of QM ,and the brain is the only organ that can actually has the power to unveil that.When the vision is forced into 3D by an external such as 3D glasses ,the brain releases chemicals that create the effect of 3D,and thats where the QM physical explanation is. Einstein proved it,he used his brains effect on understanding relativity ,he saw it.
    orlando koesling orlando koesling
    Nov. 16, 2012 at 9:49am
Registered readers are invited to post a comment. To encourage fruitful discussion, please keep your comments relevant, brief and courteous. Offensive, irrelevant, nonsensical and commercial posts will not be published. (All links will be removed from comments.)

You must register with Science News to add a comment. To log-in click here. To register as a new user, follow this link.

Follow Us