Quantcast
issue
Read articles, including Science News stories written for ages 9-14, on the SNK website.
Marine microbes prove potent greenhouse gas emitters
The unsung climate warmers are single-celled organisms once considered a type of bacteria.
A+ A- Text Size

The unsung climate warmers are single-celled organisms once considered a type of bacteria.

By Janet Raloff

Web edition: August 3, 2011

Earth’s oceans emit an estimated 30 percent of the nitrous oxide, or N2O, entering the atmosphere. Yet the source of this potent greenhouse gas has puzzled scientists for years. Bacteria — long the leading candidate — can generate N2O, although the seas don’t seem to contain enough to account for all of the N2O that the marine world has been coughing up. Now researchers at the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution and MIT offer a more likely candidate: archaea.

The seas contain more than enough of these single-celled microbes (once thought to be a type of bacteria). Moreover, the Massachusetts-based researchers’ new data show, these microbes have a penchant for transforming ammonia into N2O. And there’s no shortage of ammonia in the oceans.

“Basically, we’ve figured out that the most abundant organism on the planet makes a very potent greenhouse gas,” observes microbial oceanographer Alyson Santoro of Woods Hole, who led the new investigation. And not only are archaea the most abundant microbes in general, she says, but they’re also the most numerous residents of the marine world. Her team’s findings appeared online July 28 in Science.

Despite their vast numbers, the presence of marine archaea only came to light in 1992, she says. A little more than a dozen years later, a pivotal paper emerged suggesting that these microbes might break down ammonia. “What we’ve now shown,” Santoro explains, “is that archaea can make N2O” — and plenty of it, at least in the lab.

So what? Apportioning oceanic N2O production to archaea doesn’t change the quantities of this gas available to help warm Earth’s climate. But Santoro observes that knowing its likely source is “an important first step in predicting how N2O emissions could change as the oceans warm, or acidify — or low oxygen areas expand.” All of these conditions are underway and likely to increase as global warming continues.

Indeed, her group is curious about how archaea might respond to growing dead zones, like the one that forms in the Gulf of Mexico, each year (and at hundreds more coastal sites around the world). The researchers' concern: As oxygen concentrations in seawater fall, ammonia-oxidizing (or degrading) bacteria ramp up their production of N2O.

Comment
Print Friendly and PDF

A.E. Santoro, et al. Isotopic signature of N2O produced by marine ammonia-oxidizing archaea. Science, in press. doi: 10.1126/science.1208239. Abstract: [Go to]


J. Raloff. Eels point to suffocating Gulf floor. Science News blog, Aug. 2, 2011. [Go to]

R. Ehrenberg. Coastal dead zones expanding: A new tally reports more than 400 of the oxygen starved regions worldwide. Science News Online, August 15, 2008. Available to subscribers: [Go to]

T. Hesman Saey. Dissing a loaded label for some unicellular life: Prominent biologist calls ‘prokaryote’ outdated term. Science News, Vol. 175, Apr. 11, 2009, p. 5. Available to subscribers: [Go to].

J. Travis. Third branch of life bares its genes. Science News, Vol. 150, Aug. 24, 1996, p. 116. Available to subscribers: [Go to]

J. Raloff. Nitrous oxide fingered as monster ozone slayer. Science News online, Aug. 27, 2009. Available to subscribers: [Go to]

S. Perkins. An ounce of prevention. Science News, Vol. 158, July 15, 2000, p. 45. Available to subscribers: [Go to]

Comments (2)

Please alert Science News to any inappropriate posts by clicking the REPORT SPAM link within the post. Comments will be reviewed before posting.

  • Since warming is good, and cooling is bad, all I can say is, "Go, Archaea, Go!"
    Brian Hall Brian Hall
    Aug. 8, 2011 at 9:05am
  • Janet, I went to the web links in your article. The EPA lists global natural sources of N2O but only US-sourced human generated N2O. What is the total global amount of human-generated N2O and how do the worldwide sources compare with the U.S. sources in both total numbers and percent of total
    Robert Woodman Robert Woodman
    Aug. 10, 2011 at 8:53am
Registered readers are invited to post a comment. To encourage fruitful discussion, please keep your comments relevant, brief and courteous. Offensive, irrelevant, nonsensical and commercial posts will not be published. (All links will be removed from comments.)

You must register with Science News to add a comment. To log-in click here. To register as a new user, follow this link.

Follow Us