Quantcast
issue
Read articles, including Science News stories written for ages 9-14, on the SNK website.
Brain may sabotage efforts to lose weight
The sight of food turns different parts of the brain on in lean versus obese people, a new study finds
A+ A- Text Size

The sight of food turns different parts of the brain on in lean versus obese people, a new study finds

By Janet Raloff

Web edition: September 19, 2011
Print edition: October 22, 2011; Vol.180 #9 (p. 16)

In obese people, even when the brain knows the body isn’t hungry, it responds to food as if it were, new brain-scan data show. That means that when obese people try to shed weight, they may find themselves on the losing side of a battle with neural centers that unconsciously encourage them to eat.

For instance, in normal-weight people a neural reward system that reinforces positive feelings associated with food turns off when levels of the blood sugar glucose return to normal after a meal — a signal that the body’s need for calories has been sated. But in obese people, that reward center in the central brain turns on at the sight of high-calorie food even when their blood sugar levels are normal.

The new findings show that “the regulatory role of glucose was missing in the obese,” says Elissa Epel of the University of California, San Francisco, an obesity researcher not involved with the new study. She says the data might “explain the drive to eat that some obese people feel despite how much they’ve eaten.”

For the study, nine lean and five obese adult volunteers viewed pictures of foods such as ice cream, french fries, cauliflower or a salad while undergoing brain scans. Throughout the procedure, researchers asked the recruits to rate their hunger and how much they wanted a particular item.

Volunteers arrived for their brain scans several hours after eating, and the researchers used insulin pumps to establish volunteers’ blood sugar levels at either normal background values (roughly 90 milligrams per deciliter), or at the “mild” end of low (around 70 milligrams per deciliter). That low value can occur briefly in some people during the day, especially in people with diabetes or metabolic conditions that precede diabetes, notes endocrinologist Robert Sherwin of Yale University, coauthor of the new study.

All volunteers reported wanting food, especially high-calorie fare, when blood glucose was low, Sherwin’s team reports online September 19 in the Journal of Clinical Investigation. Brain scans showed that parts of the brain that control reason and willpower, such as the prefrontal cortex, were relatively inactive when blood glucose was low, while regions that foster eating and offer positive reinforcement turned on. For lean people, the opposite trend emerged when blood glucose was normal.

The surprise, Sherwin says, was that the part of the brain that allows people to consciously exert willpower over food intake largely turns off in obese people. This suggests, he says, that their brain differences “may perpetuate obesity.”

Though small, this study was so well designed and controlled that it “lets us see some clean results in a relatively small cohort,” says obesity scientist Dianne Lattemann of the Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System in Seattle. The research team’s ability to discern differences in the desire for foods relative to body weight — and based on a not-too-dramatic drop in blood sugar — “is extremely interesting,” she adds. The results pull together trends seen in animals and findings reported in more limited human trials.

Comment
Print Friendly and PDF

K.A. Page et al. Circulating glucose levels modulate neural control of desire for high-calorie foods in humans. Journal of Clinical Investigation. Published online September 19, 2011. doi: 10.1172/JCI57873 [Go to]


N. Seppa. Bypass’s Big Boon: Scientists spot key players in surgery’s surprising ability to reverse diabetes. Science News, Vol. 180, September 10, 2011, p. 26. Available online: [Go to]

J. Raloff. Obesity messes with the brain, Science News, Vol. 179, April 23, p. 11, p. 8. Available online: [Go to]

J. Raloff. Still Hungry? Fattening revelations—and new mysteries—about the hunger hormone. Science News, Vol. 167, April 2, 2005, p. 216. Available online: [Go to]

J. Raloff. The New GI Tracts: For preventing heart disease, diets that control insulin are all the buzz. Science News, Vol. 157, April 8, 2000, p. 236. Available online: [Go to]

Comments (2)

Please alert Science News to any inappropriate posts by clicking the REPORT SPAM link within the post. Comments will be reviewed before posting.

  • It would be helpful to know how the volunteers rated the foods. In particular,how strongly were the obese folks drawn to the cauliflower or a salad?

    As a thin person I find rich food much more enticing than raw veges. Rich food has a drug like effect upon me. Surely an obese person experiences this at least as much.

    If they have the same reaction to raw veges as to rich food when at low blood sugar then we can eliminate most of the addiction angle. Otherwise, it just means that some people are prone to being addicted to rich food, similar to others who a prone to addiction to alcohol, tobacco, sex, works, or any of the other things some can get 'hooked on'.
    Carl Abbott Carl Abbott
    Nov. 15, 2011 at 10:17am

  • The addiction angle is a powerful one. Keeping blood sugar high enough to avoid craving rich food while staying out of the Type II Diabetes or Fat Storage zone would likely require the frequent use of blood sugar test strips (I know it did for me).

    Learning how to eat low glycemic load foods frequently (Proteins, Raw Veggies , MUFA/PUFAs and Fiber) under portion control is not easy.

    The most confounding question begged by this study is: Can this driver (visual stimulation) account for the weight-loss paradox where up to 80% of the people who lose significant weight (say with the Dukan Diet, Teta Diet and PSMF) put it back on after five years?

    I believe the answer to this hypothesis is yes which has dangerous implications for much of the population. There are many programs that are effective with dealing with long term food addiction (Over Eaters Anonymous, Weight Watchers, Spark People, Tops, etc.).

    Lets propose this then: "What is the difference in the Brain Scan between those who keep the weight off after five years (probably with the help of a peer support system) and those who are not?"

    As a researcher what I'm most interested in are those who can keep the weight off AND do not rely on a support system, specifically what behaviors and attributes differentiate them from others.

    The hope is that we may find other tools to help keep the weight off in those who may not respond well to support groups. There have to be some solutions somewhere between the 20% who keep it off and Bariatric surgery.

    On a lighter note (literally and figuratively) we should disregard those who (like myself) are obsessed with calories to the point of clinically psychosis where (as several psychiatrist friends pointed out) i.e. are beyond all hope. But I digress.
    Richard Hale Richard Hale
    Jan. 11, 2012 at 9:31am
Registered readers are invited to post a comment. To encourage fruitful discussion, please keep your comments relevant, brief and courteous. Offensive, irrelevant, nonsensical and commercial posts will not be published. (All links will be removed from comments.)

You must register with Science News to add a comment. To log-in click here. To register as a new user, follow this link.

Follow Us