Advertisement

Solar changes help create cold northern winters
Fluctuations in ultraviolet light can set up frigid, snowy conditions
Web edition : Monday, October 10th, 2011
Text Size

Harsh winters in the United States and northern Europe may partly be the result of changes in ultraviolet radiation coming from the sun.

A new climate simulation study shows how fluctuations in ultraviolet light linked to the sun’s 11-year activity cycle could change winter weather patterns across the Northern Hemisphere. The work appears online October 9 in Nature Geoscience.

“We hope this will open the door to improving ultralong-range predictions,” says co-author Adam Scaife, a climate modeler at the Met Office’s Hadley Centre in Exeter, England.

Scientists have long noted anecdotal links between low solar activity and cold European winters: Part of the Little Ice Age, which gripped the region between about 1550 and 1850, coincided with a record low number of sunspots, which are one measure of solar activity.  But until now, Scaife says, no one had found a physical explanation for how subtle changes in radiation hitting the top of Earth’s atmosphere could translate to changes in weather patterns at the surface.

The answer came from the Solar Radiation and Climate Experiment satellite. From 2004 to 2007, during the low points of the last solar cycle, the satellite measured a surprising drop-off in the amount of ultraviolet radiation coming from the sun, roughly five times greater than previously thought. “I thought, if that’s true, that’s going to do something interesting to the climate system,” Scaife says.

To test what might happen, the scientists put the big ultraviolet decline into the Met Office’s climate model, a massive computer program that can simulate how the ocean and atmosphere respond to such changes. With less ultraviolet radiation, the simulation suggested, parts of the upper atmosphere cooled more than usual and allowed winds to blow more from the east. The anomaly then got bigger and started to burrow down through the atmosphere to altitudes where weather patterns form.  There, the changes affected how storms would normally grow, allowing cold weather to form over northern Europe and the United States.

These changes occurred only in winter, and not during every solar cycle minimum the model analyzed. But over time, the scientists found, more winters saw these cold patterns form during solar minimum than during solar maximum. “It’s changing the odds of what kind of winter you’re going to get by a significant amount,” Scaife says.

At the same time, weather patterns over southern Europe and Canada were milder than normal, essentially canceling out the chill of northern Europe and the United States. The new work thus can’t say much about whether changes in solar radiation affect global temperatures, Scaife says. Other natural factors also affect the severity of winters, including volcanic eruptions and semi-regular weather patterns like El Niño.

Kunihiko Kodera, a sun-climate researcher at Nagoya University in Japan, says the new model seems to capture all the steps in the atmosphere, but small details as to how warm or cold it got over particular landmasses may make it difficult to predict localized weather changes.

If the Met Office computer model can accurately reproduce past forecasts, the researchers hope to start incorporating solar variability into long-term weather predictions. Solar activity is currently increasing toward an expected weak maximum in 2013.


Found in: Earth and Earth Science

Comments 3

Please alert Science News to any inappropriate posts by clicking the REPORT SPAM link within the post. Comments will be reviewed before posting.

  • The CERN Cloud Experiment has also shown that a weaker solar magnetic field can allow more cosmic rays to reach Earth, causing increased cloud cover and, subsequently, lower temperatures. These variations in magnetic strength should also be factored into the equation.
    Daniel Suggs Daniel Suggs
    Oct. 12, 2011 at 9:22am
  • These findings brilliantly refute those climate change deniers who claim that changes in solar irradiance have a bigger effect on climate than rises in carbon dioxide. The solar minimum merely temporarily ameliorated effects of the underlying long term rise in greenhouse gas concentrations!
    Take that, science deniers.
    Conrad Seitz Conrad Seitz
    Oct. 13, 2011 at 9:07am
  • Gosh Conrad, how much do you know about science and scientific method? Science is, in part, based on denial existing narratives. Denier or believer, climate appears to be extremely complex and therefore prone to simple stories packaged up for simple people, often by those who have political agendas and who are prone to shameless data mining. And it's not just in climate science, it's endemic.
    Michael Rethman Michael Rethman
    Oct. 17, 2011 at 9:18am
Registered readers are invited to post a comment. To encourage fruitful discussion, please keep your comments relevant, brief and courteous. Offensive, irrelevant, nonsensical and commercial posts will not be published. (All links will be removed from comments.)

You must register with Science News to add a comment. To log-in click here. To register as a new user, follow this link.

Advertisement
Suggested Reading :
seperator
  • R. Cowen. Next solar cycle could be a no-show. Science News. Vol. 180, July 16, 2011, p. 12. Available online: [Go to]__
  • J.D. Haigh et al. An influence of solar spectral variations on radiative forcing of climate. Nature. Vol. 467, October 7, 2010, p. 696. Abstract available: [Go to]
  • M. Lockwood et al. Are cold winters in Europe associated with low solar activity? Environmental Research Letters. Vol. 5, 024001, 2010. [Go to]
  • S. Perkins. Pinning down the sun-climate connection. Science News. Vol. 159, January 20, 2001, p. 45. Available online: [Go to]
Citations & References :
seperator
  • S. Ineson et al. Solar forcing of winter climate variability in the Northern Hemisphere. Nature Geoscience. doi:10.1038/ngeo1282.
Reader Favorites:
seperator
SN on the Web:
seperator