Quantcast
issue
Read articles, including Science News stories written for ages 9-14, on the SNK website.
The Drake Equation: All in the family
Nadia Drake interviews the creator of the formula for predicting how many detectable civilizations exist in the Milky Way
A+ A- Text Size

Nadia Drake interviews the creator of the formula for predicting how many detectable civilizations exist in the Milky Way

By Nadia Drake

Web edition: November 1, 2011

Enlarge
Astronomer Frank Drake and Science News astronomy writer Nadia Drake.

On November 1, the formula for estimating the abundance of extraterrestrial life in our galaxy celebrates its 50th birthday. It’s known as the Drake equation for its creator, Frank Drake, who is also my father.

The equation grew out of my dad’s need to organize a meeting he’d convened at the Green Bank Observatory, in West Virginia. Then 31, he had been thinking for a while about the materials needed to build communicating, extraterrestrial life. He ended up crafting a formula that calculates the number of detectable, intelligent civilizations in the Milky Way galaxy. That equation is now found in most astronomy textbooks.

“It was just something that had been in my mind for months. It wasn’t 'ah-hah,' it was just — to me — obvious,” he recalled during a recent interview with me. [Subscribers to Science News can read the complete Q&A here. It will also be available in the November 7 issue of Science News Prime, the tablet version of Science News available on the iPad.]

To that meeting in Green Bank, my dad invited “everybody in the world” he could think of with a scientific interest in extraterrestrial intelligence — all 12 people. Carl Sagan was there. Otto Struve was there. Melvin Calvin was there.

At the time, looking for aliens still sat on the fringes of science. But in the intervening five decades, searching for extraterrestrial intelligence has moved inside, even taking up residence in people’s homes. As radio telescopes turned a hopeful ear to the stars and optical telescopes kept their eyes peeled for an illuminated alien pulse, a cavalry of citizens armed with personal computers sorted through jumbles of data. A new branch of science — astrobiology — even grew up and dedicated itself to the scientific search for little green men — or at least microbes — and the places they might call home...

But even though the Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence still runs into roadblocks, I think it’s fair to say that many people eagerly await the tell-tale message hailing us from across the interstellar sea, the signal that will tell us that Earth isn’t an isolated inhabited island alone amidst endlessly quiet worlds.

The equation describing the number of potential callers has remained unchanged in the half century since it was written, but some of its seven terms have evolved slightly different definitions. My dad and I spoke about these more puzzling pieces of the equation, like the vexing “L” — the amount of time for which a civilization is detectable — and “ne” or the fraction of habitable planets. Wait — planets, or any kind of habitable, celestial body? What about moons like Europa?

“When we talk about the number of habitable planets, what we really mean is the number of habitable bodies. There may be systems where there are more habitable moons than planets,” Dad said during our interview.

Now, each new dispatch from exoplanet hunters sends ne tiptoeing closer to an answer, as its next-door factor “fp” — the fraction of stars with planets — has already done.

Maybe in another 50 years, we’ll know how to fill in the values for each of the equation’s terms. And maybe, during those 50 years, we’ll even hear a whisper — or a shout — from across the galaxy.

Science News subscribers can click here to read the full text of Nadia Drake's Q&A with Frank Drake.

Comment
Print Friendly and PDF

Comments (4)

Please alert Science News to any inappropriate posts by clicking the REPORT SPAM link within the post. Comments will be reviewed before posting.

  • The Drake equation is one of the most creative activities in science. The hardest question is probably how long a civilization with the ability to communicate into space might survive. In our case it is barely 50 years so far and may only last a few hundred years before nature or man does us in.
    Richard  Firestone Richard Firestone
    Nov. 4, 2011 at 1:01pm
  • The Drake equation is based on imagination and guesses,not real factual information that has been proven.So in my humble opinion it is meaningless if you are trying to actually get facts. We don't know much about life forms since only 1 planet is known to have it. So extrapolating from that there must be 1 planet around every star that has intelligent life.We have barely any info on extrasolar planets or how many there may be so how can you even begin to say how many are inhabited?
    PAUL CLIFFORD PAUL CLIFFORD
    Nov. 7, 2011 at 9:16am
  • Paul, it's well known that several factors in the Drake equation are very poorly known, and that therefore the result is very unreliable. As the factors become better understood, the result will become more reliable. You seem to think this is a settled question; it's not, and we know that.
    David Wolff David Wolff
    Nov. 21, 2011 at 9:41am
  • I have used the Drake equation for the last 60 years to introduce Enrico Fermi’s question “Where are they?.” By which he meant that absence of evidence of extraterrestrial intelligent life meant to him that there must have been one of two blocking “filters”. He called them, respectively, the great filter behind us, by which he meant our existence was infinitesimally unlikely and lucky, notwithstanding the Drake equation concept, and the great filter in front of us. It was this latter filter that concerned him. For he was concerned that after intelligent life came technical life and after that came destruction brought about directly, or indirectly from the technology. He was feeling particularly guilty that, through the Manhattan project and his contributions to the atomic age, he might have been contributing to the front great filter. So, like Fermi, I would love to see evidence of intelligent life, but have reasons to be dismayed on seeing evidence of primitive life forms. That would suggest that intelligent life is not good for the host planet.
    Alfredo Sadun Alfredo Sadun
    Nov. 22, 2011 at 9:49am
Registered readers are invited to post a comment. To encourage fruitful discussion, please keep your comments relevant, brief and courteous. Offensive, irrelevant, nonsensical and commercial posts will not be published. (All links will be removed from comments.)

You must register with Science News to add a comment. To log-in click here. To register as a new user, follow this link.

Follow Us