Advertisement

More like Faux-malhaut b
Distant point of light may not have been a planet after all
Text Size
access
The Hubble space telescope imaged the Fomalhaut system, its large dusty debris ring and a probable planet (box). Inset shows the location of the suspected planet and its projected orbit.NASA

In 2008, astronomers snapped what they claimed was the first actual picture of an exoplanet. The Hubble Space Telescope image showed a pinpoint of light orbiting a star called Fomalhaut approximately 25 light-years from Earth.

Now, a different team of scientists spying on the presumed planet, dubbed Fomalhaut b, with the Spitzer Space Telescope suggests that the bright dot in the original image isn’t a planet at all. Though the team isn’t sure what the dot is, the point of light doesn’t appear to radiate at the infrared wavelengths where exoplanets should, a team led by Markus Janson of Princeton University reports in a paper posted online January 24 at arXiv.org.

This isn’t the first time that Fomalhaut b has stumped astronomers. Ground-based infrared telescopes haven’t been able to see it, and it’s tracing an unexpected path around its star. Theories proposed to explain the imaged “planet” range from a background star to light scattered by a dust cloud.

But these results don’t mean that Fomalhaut is a lonely star: It’s circled by a dusty debris disk that bears an elliptical shape resembling the handiwork of a giant planetary shepherd — a planet that just hasn’t been found yet. “The ‘real’ Fomalhaut b still hides in the system,” the scientists conclude.


Found in: Astronomy and Atom & Cosmos

Comments 3

Please alert Science News to any inappropriate posts by clicking the REPORT SPAM link within the post. Comments will be reviewed before posting.

  • Hmm sounds like an interstellar space ship not a planet. well if it was a planet in a dust cloud it would not look like a planet outsode of a dust cloud. The dust would certainly change the abeldo in the infra-red.
    John Zilka John Zilka
    Jan. 27, 2012 at 9:05am
  • Or a giant habitat.
    Brian Hall Brian Hall
    Jan. 30, 2012 at 9:21am
  • right on conclusion; an unobstructed line of sight encompassing a 25 light year span, challenges static cosmic analytic parameters; too much distance, too many unknowns between here and there ensconched in a moving galactic quadrant.....we have seen the light, now we are in the night
    A.M. Fonda A.M. Fonda
    Jan. 30, 2012 at 9:21am
Registered readers are invited to post a comment. To encourage fruitful discussion, please keep your comments relevant, brief and courteous. Offensive, irrelevant, nonsensical and commercial posts will not be published. (All links will be removed from comments.)

You must register with Science News to add a comment. To log-in click here. To register as a new user, follow this link.

Advertisement
Suggested Reading :
seperator
  • R. Cowen. Extrasolar planetary system makes pictorial debut. Science News. Vol. 174, December 6, 2008, p. 5. Available online: [Go to]
Citations & References :
seperator
  • M. Janson et al. Infrared Non-detection of Fomalhaut b -- Implications for the Planet Interpretation. arXiv.org:1201.4388. Posted January 24, 2012. [Go to]
Reader Favorites:
seperator
SN on the Web:
seperator