Web edition: April 10, 2012
People may argue about why Earth is warming, how long its fever will last and whether any of this warrants immediate corrective action. But whether Earth is warming is no longer open to debate. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration has just published domestic examples to reinforce what Americans witnessed last month — either on TV or in their own backyards.
Let's start with the heat: March 2012 temperatures averaged 10.6° Celsius (51° Fahrenheit) — or 5.5 °C warmer than the 20th century average across the contiguous United States. Throughout the more than 115 years that national U.S. weather data have been compiled, only one other month (January 2006) surpassed this past March in its departure from the average.
In all, U.S. weather stations logged almost 15,300 all-time highs, last month, roughly half of them for nighttime temps. “There were 21 instances of the nighttime temperatures being as warm, or warmer, than the existing record daytime temperature for a given date,” NOAA’s new analysis finds. Only Alaska bucked the trend; its temperatures were the tenth coolest for March.
Nor was last month the only anomalous period. The first three months of 2012 also set a record for toastiness across the contiguous United States, with an average temperature throughout the period of some 5.6 degrees above the long-term average. Sixteen states had temperatures ranking among their 10 warmest for the quarter. None of the contiguous states posted a quarterly composite for January through March that fell below its long-term average.
In many regions, March weather anomalies sparked conversations. At the Society of Toxicology meeting in San Francisco, for instance, I ran into three researchers who remarked on needing sweaters. All said it was warmer at home than at the meeting — home being Michigan, Maine and Indiana. In the DC area, people ogled earlier-than-normal blooms in their yards and on century-old cherry trees lining the Tidal Basin.
Nationally, the entire 2011-to-2012 cold season (October through March) proved especially mild. It was the second-warmest on record across the 48 states.
Accompanying the heat came a diminished rainfall. Nationally, the 2012 precipitation average is somewhat more than 0.7 centimeters (0.29 inches) below average. As of last week, one-third of the lower 48 states were experiencing drought — up from 18.8 percent this time last year.
The heat stirred up weather systems, driving plenty of big storms. March 2012 saw more than 220 tornadoes — or almost 2.8 times the long-term average for that month. One particularly severe spell on March 2-3 caused 40 deaths and racked up an estimated $1.5 billion in commercial and property losses.
The “Climate Extremes Index” — a scale introduced 16 years ago — attempts to quantify trends in extreme weather by identifying the percent of the contiguous states that fall outside the norm of temperature, precipitation, severe drought and hurricanes (or tropical storms) making landfall. So far, the 2012 index rating is 39 percent, or about twice the expected value.
Weather records are just one quantifiable measure of warming. Many others can be harder to eyeball. For instance, the annual mean sea surface temperature for last year was the 9th warmest for the period that started in 1880. (The 10 warmest years have all occurred since January 2000.)
We reported a wealth of analyses last year pointing to the Arctic having evolved “to a new normal,” with warmer, drier weather. Last July, researchers announced that relatively deep coastal waters off Greenland are now expected to warm considerably faster than elsewhere by the year 2100, exaggerating the risk of ice sheet melting and global sea-level rise.
Many people won't complain about a somewhat balmier winter or marginally early spring. But warming isn't a cold-weather phenomenon. It's a 24/7 event occurring year-round. And at least here in the nation's capital, an increase in the normal summer-long muggy heat is not something I can imagine anyone welcoming.
Suggested Reading
D. Powell. Less sea ice brings more snow. Science News. Vol. 181, April 7, 2012, p. 11. Available to subscribers: [Go to]
J. Raloff. Arctic has taken a turn for the warmer. Science News Online. December 2, 2011. Available to subscribers: [Go to]
J. Raloff. Greenland's ice sheets face new threats. Science News Online. July 6, 2011. Available to subscribers: [Go to]
J. Raloff. Insurance payouts point to climate change. Science News blog. January 4, 2012. [Go to]
A. Witze. Summer Arctic melt among worse ever. Science News Online. September 14, 2011. Available to subscribers: [Go to]
Please alert Science News to any inappropriate posts by clicking the REPORT SPAM link within the post. Comments will be reviewed before posting.
Overall, the warmth was part of a stalled, amplified (large north/south meanders) jet stream due to the North Atlantic Oscillation and waning La Nina. Except for a historic October snow storm, snowfall here this season was the least in my 13 years or so of daily measurements. Counting the storm, it came in as the "typical" low snow season of 43-51".
Also, the deniers now decide that only one year of data doesn't matter when previously they were claiming that there has been cooling by using the hottest year on record, 1998, as their starting point rather than long term averages.
The no net warming in 15 years is mostly true, though the monster El Nino in 1998 makes comparisons to that time frame problematic. Unfortunately, there's no good timeframe for comparisons - 60 years wipes out the effects of the PDO and AMO, 30 years can exacerbate them (the satellite record starting from 1979 is when the PDO flipped to a positive mode and the recent warming period commenced), and short terms can mask the effects of the ENSO oscillations. It really is an awful mess, and very hard to avoid cherry picking data. Some effects really do show up in the short term, so dismissing shortterm changes makes it impossible to study some interesting effects.
One surprise over the last few years is that small towns have a measurable heat island effect. A lot of the US's temperature record has shifted from farms to more urban areas and airports since the Co-op observer program started. GISS does an awful job correcting that, but there are also land use changes that may show up in the southeast's cooling as farms shift from row crops to forestry.
I guess the main point of this note is cautionary - be very careful of saying that climate changes is anthropogenic, in particular, be very care of blaming it on CO2 increases. Once you correct for Urban Heat Island, there may not be much anomalous heating to be found.
You must register with Science News to add a comment. To log-in click here. To register as a new user, follow this link.