Researchers look to the good version of the protein implicated in mad cow disease for insight into the protein’s bad side.
Web edition
:
Monday, July 14th, 2008

Text Size
When the nefarious Mr. Hyde takes his own life, the
good Dr. Jekyll is also killed.
Scientists are adopting the reverse approach for
halting the protein behind prion diseases such as Creutzfeldt-Jakob and mad cow.
By targeting the harmless version of the brain protein whose evil alter ego brings
on disease, researchers have prevented the bad version of the protein from
continuing its rampage in the brains of infected mice. The results are reported
online July 14 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
The approach of killing Jekyll to get Hyde is very
promising, comments biochemist Sina Ghaemmaghami of the Institute for
Neurodegenerative Diseases at the University
of California, San Francisco. The sinister version of the
protein comes in several slightly different forms, making it hard to develop a
single attack strategy, Ghaemmaghami says.
Led by neuroscientist Giovanna Mallucci of University
College London, researchers delivered bits of attack RNA to interfere with
production of the normal version of the prion protein. In animals who have
prion disease, this protein somehow gets converted into a dangerous form, which
then travels through the brain, coaxing other good versions of the protein to
go bad.
The bad versions of the protein then clump
together, a process that damages cells, although scientists aren’t exactly sure
how.
“No one knows what the toxic entity is — that’s the
black box,” says Mallucci.
It’s also a mystery how prions replicate — they
seem to do it without DNA — and they are difficult to kill.
Using bits of RNA that interfere with protein
production has potential as a therapy for treating many neurodegenerative
diseases, but those therapies are a ways off, says Ghaemmaghami. In the new
study, researchers injected the interfering RNA, packed in a lentivirus, into
the hippocampus of rodents already given
a diseased version of the protein. Treated animals lived longer and had fewer
symptoms of prion disease.
But getting therapeutic molecules into the human
brain is another story, especially molecules as big as RNA. “The brain is just about the hardest place to
get into,” Ghaemmaghami says.
In a separate study, researchers have come closer
to understanding what PrP, the innocuous Dr. Jekyll version of the prion protein,
does for a living. The PrP protein is found in most brain cells, but its
function remains a mystery. Mice engineered to not have the PrP protein appear relatively
healthy. The slight differences scientists have noted is that PrP-free mice
don’t perform quite as well as their normal counterparts on some learning and
memory tasks and also don’t recover as well from seizures or strokes.
To investigate the role of regular PrP, Gerald
Zamponi and colleagues at the University
of Calgary in Canada looked
at communication among the brain cells of PrP-free mice. When the nerve cells
received the messenger molecule known as glutamate, they went into hyperactive mode,
repeatedly firing as if the message had been shouted at them, says
Zamponi. These overexcited cells were
more likely to die because of this overactivation, the scientists report in a recent Journal of Cell Biology.
Normal PrP protein might function to block some
NMDA receptors and thereby prevent overexcitement of certain neurons, says
Zamponi.
The researchers also removed magnesium from the
cells. Magnesium usually blocks some of the receptors that catch the NMDA
messages. Without it, the brain cells went into seizure mode, further evidence
that the PRP-free mice were super-sensitive to NMDA.
The PrP protein seems to have emerged late in
vertebrate evolution—there is no version that scientists can scrutinize in
critters like yeast and fruit flies. While it is too early to conclusively
identify its role, investigating what the good version of the protein does has
merit, says UCSF’s Ghaemmaghami.
After all, that’s how the good Dr. Jekyll’s friends
learned the origin of the deadly Mr. Hyde.
Found in: Biology, Body & Brain and Genes & Cells
I. The two faces of prion proteins
http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/34119/title/The_two_faces_of_prion_proteins
- "Scientists are learning more about the protein behind mad cow and Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease, including how to interfere with the proteins' production in the brains of mice. "
- "It’s also a mystery how prions replicate — they seem to do it without DNA — and they are difficult to kill."
II. At Genesis replicating RNA-related oligomers replicated without DNA!
IMO there is a definite, even if yet vaguely understood, relationship between CJ and Life Genesis phenomena parallel to the likewise relationship between black-holes and biosphere phenomena.
Black-holes and Biosphere(s?) are both phenomena of constrained energy pockets within a universe of expanding energy.
CJ and Life Genesis are both phenomena of serendipitous occurrence of favourable energy potential, in the case of life genesis between incoming sun's radiation and RNA-related oligomers, and in CJ proteins replication between specific protein-forming-enzymes and enzymes-protein complexes:
III. Prions, Normal and Pathogenic.
http://blog.360.yahoo.com/blog-P81pQcU1dLBbHgtjQjxG_Q--?cq=1&p=125
(A) Aug 15, 2004 DH, biologicalEvolution forum.
Re Scientific American July 2004, "Detecting Mad Cow Disease", SB Prusiner.
Genesis and replication modes of pathogenic prions curiously connote initial genesis and evolution of life, maybe from an RNA-related conformation. In both cases the process-enabling-moving circumstances are presence of the precursors of the Bingo Conformation plus a favorable energy balance.
Is it probable/possible, therefore, that the switch from normal to pathogenic prions is enabled and moved by a replacement of a component amino-acid such as tryptophane/niacin ?
(B) Aug 28, 2004 DH, biologicalEvolution forum.
The subject intrigues me because back in the early '50s I effected encephalomyelitis in fowls by inadequate levels of niacin or tryptophane and found that the minimal required level of these amino acids for the type of fowl was related to the physiology/weight/activity characteristics of the different fowl types.
My gut feeling (obviously not experimental evidence) is that PrPc to PrPSc conversion is indeed a "posttranslational conversion", initiated and maintained by a replacement of an amino acid, initiated and chain-reacting due to an energetically effected equation situation, on one side the PrPc precursors and on the other side the precipitating PrPSc.
Now I just read (The Scientist) updated reports that purified PrPSc do not replicate and that indeed various PrPSc's differ in amino acid component(s) .
Therefore it is required now to learn if tagged PrPc shows up in the PrPSc, or not, for finding if the PrPSc is formed from PrPc, or if it is formed instead of and to the exclusion of PrPc.
Also these data enhance the probability that the pathogenic PrPSc's include an adjunct "agent", lost upon PrPSc purification, that directs the preferred formation of PrPSc. end.
Dov Henis
http://blog.360.yahoo.com/blog-P81pQcU1dLBbHgtjQjxG_Q--?cq=1
Please login or register to participate.