Quantcast
issue
Read articles, including Science News stories written for ages 9-14, on the SNK website.
Giant celestial disk hard to explain
Star's oversized debris ring challenges theories of planet formation
A+ A- Text Size

Star's oversized debris ring challenges theories of planet formation

By Nadia Drake

Web edition: June 15, 2012
Print edition: July 14, 2012; Vol.182 #1 (p. 11)

ANCHORAGE, Alaska — About 80 light-years away, an enormous, dusty ring swirls around a sunlike star, with a defined inner edge that is probably sculpted by a planet orbiting at 140 times Earth’s distance from the sun.

A planet located so far from a sunlike star presents an astronomical conundrum.

“How do you get a planet out that far? We don’t know how to form something out there,” astronomer Karl Stapelfeldt of NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Md., said on June 14 at the 220th Meeting of the American Astronomical Society.

Stapelfeldt and a team led by John Krist of the Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, Calif., used the Hubble Space Telescope to study 10 stars suspected of hosting large debris disks. Hubble  saw a ring around only one, HD 202628, which resides in the southern constellation Microscopium.

Everything about the dusty circle — the biggest ever observed around a solar cousin — is huge. In places, the ring itself is 70 times wider than the Earth-sun distance, called an astronomical unit. From end to end, the debris disk is roughly 400 astronomical units long — larger than the well-known ring surrounding the star Fomalhaut. Like that ring, the newly observed one is also groomed by a celestial gardener — the planet lives about 140 astronomical units from HD 202628.

This planet hasn’t yet been observed, but Stapelfeldt speculates that it might be several times more massive than Jupiter. “You can’t get a structure like this, and have it last for a long period of time, unless something keeps all the particles’ orbits lined up,” he said.

Such distantly orbiting planets challenge theories describing planet formation, especially around sunlike stars. Debris disks around these stars don’t contain enough material to grow a planet so far away. “The formation of wide-orbit planets is particularly not well-understood,” says astrophysicist Aaron Boley of the University of Florida, who studies the Fomalhaut system and its far-flung ringscaping planets. “To build a complete understanding of planet formation, we must understand the architecture of planetary systems, which includes planets that are at very large stellar separations.”

Both Boley and Krist’s team suggest that the planet living around HD 202628 may have formed closer to the star, then migrated outward. But, Stapelfeldt says, that process would have had to be unusually gentle. “If you did something violent and you threw the planet out there, its gravity would tear up the ring,” he said. “You wouldn’t expect to have something like this left over.”

Comment
Print Friendly and PDF

K. Stapelfeldt et al. An eccentric debris ring around the nearby G star HD 202862. June 14, 2012. 220th Meeting of the American Astronomical Society, Anchorage, Alaska. [Go to]

J. Krist et al. HST observations of the HD 202862 debris disk. arXiv.org:1206.2078v1. Posted June 12, 2012. [Go to]


N. Drake. Planets’ gravity tidies stellar ring. Science News. Vol. 181, May 19, 2012, p. 18. [Go to]

N. Drake. More like Faux-malhaut B. Science News. Vol. 181, February 25, 2012, p. 12. [Go to]

Comments (4)

Please alert Science News to any inappropriate posts by clicking the REPORT SPAM link within the post. Comments will be reviewed before posting.

  • Consider that the planet may be a planetoid that was captured. Such planetoids are known to exist. They are failed stars who's mass is less that 13 times that of Jupiter. Dr. Robert E. Farrell
    Robert Farrell Robert Farrell
    Jun. 19, 2012 at 9:22am
  • With all due respect, Dr. Farrell, every 'planet capture' model that I've ever read about; be it Earth Capturing the Moon, or the Sun capturing one of our odd-balls - like back-ward spinning Venus, of toppled over Uranus - from another star; have all pooh-poohed the very idea of such a 'capture'.
    I think it far more plausable that we seeing a Brown Dwarf that's in an orbit that is not at all out of line with what we see in other multiple star systems, where both (or 'all')of the stars have become large enough to ignite.
    James Staples James Staples
    Jun. 21, 2012 at 10:31pm
  • Is there a red dwarf or neutron star in the neighborhood? Perhaps a wondering brown dwarf? My point is what rule says the shepherding "planet" is from the same system? How long can such a "rouge" body drift before being captured by another system?

    The more we look the more obvious it becomes that there is a lot we cannot see, out there.
    Rusty Boyd Rusty Boyd
    Jun. 24, 2012 at 11:20pm
  • Planet formation by a star is mention, however, processes on the star do not incluce a process for such formation. A theory exist that the planets are a part of the original creation, a word exempted from physics administration, I think. Stars exhibit supernatural processes that many refuse to acknowledge, unfortunately.
    Dave
    PS: Eyebrowse rendering comment here. No harm implied.
    doowop62 doowop62
    Jul. 6, 2012 at 2:47pm
Registered readers are invited to post a comment. To encourage fruitful discussion, please keep your comments relevant, brief and courteous. Offensive, irrelevant, nonsensical and commercial posts will not be published. (All links will be removed from comments.)

You must register with Science News to add a comment. To log-in click here. To register as a new user, follow this link.

Follow Us