Quantcast
issue
Read articles, including Science News stories written for ages 9-14, on the SNK website.
Dirt Is Not Soil
A+ A- Text Size

By Janet Raloff

Web edition: July 17, 2008

Enlarge
What Is This Stuff?
This must be dirt, since "soil" would appear to be something you couldn't hold in your hands.
L. Clarke/Corbis

A number of speakers at this morning’s media preview of the Smithsonian’s soils exhibit acknowledged how they initially didn’t know that soil and dirt were not synonymous. Of course, none went on to explain the difference either. So when the Q&A period opened, my hand shot up with the first question: “What IS the difference between dirt and soil?”

Elizabeth Duggal, associate director of the museum, demurred — and then turned to Pat Megonigal for the answer. A good choice since he’s the exhibit’s curator and one of some 6,000 dues-paying members of the Soil Science Society of America. In a nutshell, he explained that “Dirt is displaced soil.”

Uh, what? Like when it’s on my shoe it’s dirt, and when it’s on the ground it isn’t? This simplistic answer didn’t quite satisfy.

So when I was able to corner Megonigal, a half hour later, I asked for some clarification. As he described it, soil is the compilation of minerals, air, water, animals and other living matter (and their wastes or decaying bodies) that accumulate in layers and become compacted over time. Indeed, soils are laid down in discrete horizons (his name for those layers) and whose compositions vary over time and space.

When particles of that soil erode or are dug up, they lose the “history” of their place, he says — essentially their associations with particles that might have been above, below, and to their sides.

It sounds like he’s saying soil is the diverse but integrated community of living and inanimate things that make up the ground beneath our feet. And dirt? It’s a group of runaways or kidnapped individuals that can’t easily be associated with where they were born and grew up. In a sense, they’re particles that have been rendered anonymous.

As my toxins rant indicated, a few days ago, I think people should use words carefully and appropriately. If, however, the distinction is all but moot, let’s not get too silly about this. When I got back to my office, this afternoon, I did look up both terms in my trusty desk dictionary (a reporter’s best friend) and found one definition of dirt as “loose or packed soil or sand: EARTH.” And a definition for soil was “firm land: EARTH.”

If one of you agronomists or soil scientists out there cares to weigh in, please be my guest.

Comment
Print Friendly and PDF

Comments (5)

Please alert Science News to any inappropriate posts by clicking the REPORT SPAM link within the post. Comments will be reviewed before posting.

  • No, Janet: you need either a better dictionary, or a handy lexicographer. Soil is what little children and old men have on the inside of their underwear; dirt is what the have on the outside.
    Bruce Roach Bruce Roach
    Jul. 20, 2008 at 10:13am
  • A soil ped is a dirt clod by any other name.
    G F G F
    Jul. 20, 2008 at 10:26pm
  • Ms Raloff I suggest you use the Oxford English Dictionary (online or printed) to obtain the etymologies of "dirt" and "soil".
    Accordingly, "dirt" probably derives from Old Norse meaning 'excrement'. "Soil" comes from Latin for 'ground'. I guess over the years the two became mixed up (post-Roman sewage arrangements in Europe probably helped!).
    Today 'dirt' often has the connotation of unpleasantness, worthlessness; 'soil' grows stuff! - though young and old can still use the word as a verb. So as has often happened two different words from different sources come to have very similar meanings and so cause semantic problems. Sloppy use of language - but not dirty talk, surely.
    ROYD WHITLOCK ROYD WHITLOCK
    Jul. 24, 2008 at 3:41am
  • I use an analogy to explain how I view the difference: Soil is different from dirt like a lake different from water.

    A lake and a soil are both ecosystems. If part of a lake splashes on me, I say I have water on me, not I have a lake on me. Likewise, if part on the soil lands on me, I say I have dirt on me, not I have soil on me.
    James Staricka James Staricka
    Jul. 28, 2008 at 2:26pm
  • James...I like your analogy. I'm assuming, based on it, that it would then be fair to say that soil is made of dirt--just as one would say that lakes are made of water?
    jar jar
    Aug. 1, 2008 at 7:04am
Registered readers are invited to post a comment. To encourage fruitful discussion, please keep your comments relevant, brief and courteous. Offensive, irrelevant, nonsensical and commercial posts will not be published. (All links will be removed from comments.)

You must register with Science News to add a comment. To log-in click here. To register as a new user, follow this link.

Follow Us