Quantcast
issue
Read articles, including Science News stories written for ages 9-14, on the SNK website.
Warming indicted for extreme weather
Climate change can explain some 2011 departures from the norm
A+ A- Text Size

Climate change can explain some 2011 departures from the norm

By Janet Raloff

Web edition: July 11, 2012
Print edition: August 11, 2012; Vol.182 #3 (p. 14)

Texans sweltered through the hottest, driest spring and summer on record last year. Much of the blame can be attributed to a recurring climate pattern known as La Niña, which emerges every few years as surface waters chill in the eastern equatorial Pacific. But Earth’s steadily warming climate contributed as well, a new analysis concludes.

Since the 1960s, the likelihood of Texas seeing extremely hot, dry weather in a La Niña year has mushroomed 20-fold due to human-induced global warming, David Rupp of Oregon State University in Corvallis and his colleagues calculate.

They were among six international teams probing climate’s link to extreme events in late 2010 through 2011. The collected findings appear in the July Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, or BAMS.

Severe food shortages, in places causing famine, gripped the Horn of Africa last year after drought left the land parched from winter 2010 through the following spring. La Niña played a role there, too. However, computer analyses of global climate conditions since 1979 find that a recent warming of surface waters in the Indian and Pacific Oceans can destabilize La Niña weather patterns. Chris Funk of the U.S. Geological Survey in Santa Barbara, Calif., concludes that these probably intensified 2011’s drought in East Africa.

Other teams pointed to global warming as a likely contributor to excessive heat in central Europe last summer and to unusually balmy temperatures in central England in November 2011. In the British case, that kind of heat could be expected to recur every 20 years now — a 62-fold increase over the 1960s.

Yet global warming can’t be blamed for all monster weather. Unprecedented flooding that submerged large tracts of northern Thailand, including its capital, for up to two months last year resulted from rainfall intensity the region had encountered before. But water management practices and heavy industrialization of a flood plain slowed drainage last year.

These new analyses are pioneering efforts to get near real-time assessments of climate’s role in extreme weather events, says climatologist Thomas Peterson of the National Climatic Data Center in Asheville, N.C.

For years, he says, climate scientists have argued that although global warming can increase the frequency of extreme weather, they couldn’t pin any particular event on human-caused climate change. That appears to be changing, Peterson and his colleagues argue in their introduction to the new report.

Using the developing field of “attribution science,” researchers are beginning to apply massive computing capacity to explore how global temperatures, reflectivity and moisture patterns can affect the odds of localized extreme weather events.

In 2011, droughts beyond Africa and Texas brought billions of dollars in crop losses, says Jessica Blunden of the National Climatic Data Center. The North Atlantic saw above-average hurricane activity (19 named storms, well over the long-term average of 12), and seven separate U.S. tornado outbreaks each wreaked more than $1 billion in damage.

Polar regions racked up their own extremes, says Martin Jeffries of the University of Alaska Fairbanks, who like Blunden, was an editor of a second new analysis: State of the Climate in 2011, released July 10 as a BAMS supplement. Barrow, Alaska, sustained a record 86 consecutive days when the minimum air temperature failed to dip below freezing.

Understanding global warming’s role in extreme events extends well beyond blaming rights. Peterson notes that water managers may need to change policies if evidence begins pointing to persistent changes in the recurrence rates and lengths of droughts or the frequency of heavy rains. Right now, linking these events is difficult, usually works only for events lasting longer than a month, and takes a year to complete. Peterson’s team hopes to see the science mature to the point that assessments might be turned around more quickly and tackle events lasting mere days.

Comment
Print Friendly and PDF

J. Blunden and D.S. Arndt (Editors). State of the Climate in 2011. Special supplement to the Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, Vol. 93, July 2012, p.S1. [Go to]

T.C. Peterson, P.A. Stott and S. Herring (editors). Explaining extreme events of 2011 from a climate perspective. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, Vol. 93, July 2012, p. 1041. doi: 10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00021.1. [Go to]


S. Perkins. A limit for carbon emissions: 1 trillion metric tons. Science News Online, April 29, 2009. Available online: [Go to]

S. Perkins. Seeing the future hot spells. Science News, Vol. 175, April 11, 2009, p. 9. Available online: [Go to]

S. Perkins. From bad to worse: Earth's warming to accelerate. Science News, Vol. 171, February 10, 2007, p. 83. Available online: [Go to]

J. Raloff. Insurance payouts point to climate change. Science News Online, January 4, 2012. [Go to]

A. Witze. Climate’s effect on extreme weather is no game of chance. Science News Prime, October 31, 2011. [Go to]

Comments (1)

Please alert Science News to any inappropriate posts by clicking the REPORT SPAM link within the post. Comments will be reviewed before posting.

  • Humanity has turned a blind eye to it's massive unnatural aquatic thermal contribution, because few realize that the oceans have a predominant inwards direction of conduction. This means that the oceans have been holding onto most of the thermal energy that we introduce into it, thus we have created a worldwide aquatic thermal build-up. This isn't the result of our atmospheric CO2's as has been suggested, but mainly from our direct thermal contribution. __And it is this aquatic thermal contribution that has triggered the rapid decline in the planetary ice, and not just the CO2's. This is why so many scientists have been confused. This unnatural aquatic thermal build-up has also naturally increased the surface area needed to vent off the growing thermal accumulation, which naturally is within the planets colder regions, due to the closeness of the surface water temperatures to that of the oceans upper DOW. It is the predominant downwards or inwards direction of conduction that is the key stablizing factor for the planetary ice. By increasing the surfacing area being used for the venting off of the aquatic thermal build-up, within the colder regions, we have unwittingly neutralized vast areas of this stablizing conduction factor. Thus triggering the rapid rate of ice melt. And with the loss of the ice, we have altered the natural direction of the tidal flows and triggered a spiking up in the aquatic temperatures, due to the decline in the cooling potential, while continuing to increase our unnatural thermal contribution. __Which brings up another very serious potential contributing factor. It has been brought to my attention by a researcher who has been doing preliminary experiments on the matter, that there is evidence to suggest that extracting oil from under the sea floor might be increasing the "considered" normal rate in which thermal energy is being transferred from the hotter planet surface into the colder ocean waters, positioned above the surface. The testing suggests that the oil industry should fund this further study or stop extraction until it has been done.
    Randall Scott Randall Scott
    Jan. 30, 2013 at 2:13pm
Registered readers are invited to post a comment. To encourage fruitful discussion, please keep your comments relevant, brief and courteous. Offensive, irrelevant, nonsensical and commercial posts will not be published. (All links will be removed from comments.)

You must register with Science News to add a comment. To log-in click here. To register as a new user, follow this link.

Follow Us