- :: Atom & Cosmos
- :: Body & Brain
- :: Earth
- :: Environment
- :: Genes & Cells
- :: Humans
- :: Life
- :: Matter & Energy
- :: Molecules
- :: Science & Society
- :: Other Topics
- :: Science News For Kids
Police know how to spot the guilty party: He’s the one trying not to stand out. Now scientists are applying the same principle to finding genes responsible for cancer.
Typically, researchers assume that underactive or overactive genes in diseased cells must be the ones causing an illness. In the new approach, cancer researchers looked instead for genes displaying particularly constant activity levels over time — that is, relatively constant conversion of the gene into templates for making proteins.
If a cancer cell depends on a gene, the thinking goes, the cell will expend energy to keep the activity of that gene tightly constrained to the value that’s best for the cancerous condition. So looking for genes that are more “mild mannered” in cancer cells than in healthy ones could reveal which genes the cancerous cell cares about the most.
“What’s really novel is that they’re saying these things
that are absolutely crucial are kept at a constant level,” comments Erica
Golemis, an oncologist at
Using the new approach, Patrick Tan of the National Cancer
Centre,
“It opens up some new avenues to study metastasis,” comments
Chi Dang, a molecular oncologist at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
in
Tan’s team also looked back at data from 11 previous studies of gene expression in cancer tissues. These studies included about 1,300 tissue samples from various cancer types, including lung, thyroid, liver, colon and breast cancer. The researchers found that activity levels of the 48 genes were often tightly regulated in the cancer cell samples.
Found in: Genes & Cells
- Barry, P. 2007. Genome 2.0. Science News. [Go to]

A. From "Bistable Cell Division Switch":
http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2008-03/dumc-ast032108.php
This switch is part of a critical pathway that controls cell division, production of new cells. Before a cell starts to divide, it goes through a checklist to make sure everything is in order. If the checklist uncovers something wrong, it can halt the process. But once a cell passes a "restriction point", there’s no turning back, no matter the consequences. The switch controls this milestone and is key to cell growth.
The switch is part of the Rb-E2F signaling pathway. Rb, or retinoblastoma, is a key tumor suppressor GENE, and E2F is a protein, a GENE TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR that governs the expression of all the genes essential for cells to grow. This wiring diagram is fundamentally the same in different organisms, to regulate their growth.
The cellular pathway that includes the switch is found in all multi-cellular life, from plants to people. A decision within the cell triggers the pathway when an external chemical signal to grow is received.
B. Who decides to do cell division or, generally, to do any thing, within the OCM, the outer cell membrane?
Let's leave aside the many decision-related questions such as when and how a need for a decision is prompted, how decisions are instructed and executed. Let's apply ourselves now ONLY to the question WHO makes the decision.
I conjecture that the genome behaves not as being presided by a decider PG, a President Gene, but by innate complete credence to each and every member of the cooperative genome commune of its genes membership, thus accepting a priori the decision of the individual member, but But BUt BUT coupling this with a very elaborate system of crisscross checklisting of this decision by other members of the genome.
Conjecturing,
Dov Henis
http://blog.360.yahoo.com/blog-P81pQcU1dLBbHgtjQjxG_Q--?cq=1&p=372
Please login or register to participate.