Hidden in plain view
The boring genes might be the disease culprits
Web edition : Friday, July 18th, 2008
font_down font_up Text Size

Police know how to spot the guilty party: He’s the one trying not to stand out. Now scientists are applying the same principle to finding genes responsible for cancer.

Typically, researchers assume that underactive or overactive genes in diseased cells must be the ones causing an illness. In the new approach, cancer researchers looked instead for genes displaying particularly constant activity levels over time — that is, relatively constant conversion of the gene into templates for making proteins.

If a cancer cell depends on a gene, the thinking goes, the cell will expend energy to keep the activity of that gene tightly constrained to the value that’s best for the cancerous condition. So looking for genes that are more “mild mannered” in cancer cells than in healthy ones could reveal which genes the cancerous cell cares about the most.

“What’s really novel is that they’re saying these things that are absolutely crucial are kept at a constant level,” comments Erica Golemis, an oncologist at Fox Chase Cancer Center in Philadelphia.

Using the new approach, Patrick Tan of the National Cancer Centre, Singapore and his colleagues identified 48 genes with expressions that vary less in cancerous cells than in healthy cells. To confirm whether such genes are important in cancer, the scientists reduced the expression of five of the genes — p53CSV, MAP3K11, MTCH2, CPSF6 and SKIP — in cancer cells grown in lab dishes. As a result, the cells became less able to spread to new tissues in a standard lab test for metastasis, the team reports online July 18 in PLoS Genetics.

“It opens up some new avenues to study metastasis,” comments Chi Dang, a molecular oncologist at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine in Baltimore. However, Dang adds, “It needs to be relooked at by another group because it is a different perspective.”

Tan’s team also looked back at data from 11 previous studies of gene expression in cancer tissues. These studies included about 1,300 tissue samples from various cancer types, including lung, thyroid, liver, colon and breast cancer. The researchers found that activity levels of the 48 genes were often tightly regulated in the cancer cell samples.

 “They’ve done a huge number of controls, and it’s a massive amount of data,” Golemis says. “I think their quality control is quite good.” Golemis says that she would like to see whether activity levels for the proteins made by these 48 genes are also unusually steady in cancer cells. The researchers are currently working on protein activity studies.

Looking for steady-state genes could also reveal important genes for other diseases, Golemis suggests. “I think it’s promising.”

 


Found in: Genes & Cells
Comments 1
  • How Decisions Are Made Within The OCM (outer cell membrane)


    A. From "Bistable Cell Division Switch":

    http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2008-03/dumc-ast032108.php

    This switch is part of a critical pathway that controls cell division, production of new cells. Before a cell starts to divide, it goes through a checklist to make sure everything is in order. If the checklist uncovers something wrong, it can halt the process. But once a cell passes a "restriction point", there’s no turning back, no matter the consequences. The switch controls this milestone and is key to cell growth.

    The switch is part of the Rb-E2F signaling pathway. Rb, or retinoblastoma, is a key tumor suppressor GENE, and E2F is a protein, a GENE TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR that governs the expression of all the genes essential for cells to grow. This wiring diagram is fundamentally the same in different organisms, to regulate their growth.

    The cellular pathway that includes the switch is found in all multi-cellular life, from plants to people. A decision within the cell triggers the pathway when an external chemical signal to grow is received.


    B. Who decides to do cell division or, generally, to do any thing, within the OCM, the outer cell membrane?

    Let's leave aside the many decision-related questions such as when and how a need for a decision is prompted, how decisions are instructed and executed. Let's apply ourselves now ONLY to the question WHO makes the decision.

    I conjecture that the genome behaves not as being presided by a decider PG, a President Gene, but by innate complete credence to each and every member of the cooperative genome commune of its genes membership, thus accepting a priori the decision of the individual member, but But BUt BUT coupling this with a very elaborate system of crisscross checklisting of this decision by other members of the genome.


    Conjecturing,

    Dov Henis

    http://blog.360.yahoo.com/blog-P81pQcU1dLBbHgtjQjxG_Q--?cq=1&p=372
    Dov Henis Dov Henis
    Jul. 24, 2008 at 4:23am
Post a comment

Please login or register to participate.


Advertisement
Suggested Reading:
seperator
  • Barry, P. 2007. Genome 2.0. Science News. [Go to]
Reader Favorites:
seperator
SN on the Web:
seperator