Quantcast
issue
Read articles, including Science News stories written for ages 9-14, on the SNK website.
Mideast violence goes way back
Head wounds common in region throughout last 6,000 years
A+ A- Text Size

Head wounds common in region throughout last 6,000 years

By Bruce Bower

Web edition: July 18, 2012
Print edition: August 25, 2012; Vol.182 #4 (p. 16)

Head-bashing hostilities haunted the Middle East long before the region’s current conflicts arose. Skulls of people from what are now Israel and the West Bank, dating to different times during the last 6,000 years, display a consistently high rate of serious injuries.

These head wounds typically were inflicted in small-scale brawls, not wars, say anthropologist Israel Hershkovitz of Tel Aviv University in Israel and his colleagues.

Skull injuries vary in frequency from about 1 percent to 25 percent at ancient sites around the world. Among human skulls previously excavated in Israel and the West Bank, 25 percent of individuals had suffered severe head wounds, whether they lived during the Copper Age or as recently as a century ago, the researchers report online July 11 in the International Journal of Osteoarchaeology.

That rate held for skulls from farming and urban populations and from societies that included Egyptians, Babylonians and Assyrians.

Hershkovitz’s team, which includes Palestinian anthropologist Issa. Jubrael. Sarie of Al-Quds University in Jerusalem, examined 783 skulls from community cemeteries, excluding massacre sites and battle graves.

Some head injuries in the new study might have resulted from warfare, and instances of such damage would have been even greater had the researchers examined skulls from battle sites, comments archaeologist Augusta McMahon of the University of Cambridge in England. “Prehistory was not peaceful,” says McMahon, who is directing excavations of a mass grave at a 5,800-year-old Syrian settlement (SN: 2/9/08, p. 90).

For ancient populations that were armed mainly with clubs, injuries caused by one-on-one fights or warfare are difficult to tell apart. “A mace blow received from a neighbor during an argument and a mace blow received from a foreign enemy in battle look the same on a skull,” McMahon says.

Most injuries consisted of circular pits with partially healed fractures, caused either by slingshots or clubs that in some instances may have had metal heads. Knife or sword wounds first appeared around 2,000 years ago but represented only a minority of head injuries, even in the most recent populations. The scientists identified two gunshot wounds in the sample.

Overall, 34 percent of male skulls and 19 percent of female skulls bore evidence of serious injuries. Most individuals with head wounds were at least 19 years old, the investigators say.

Analyses of unearthed skulls can’t establish the actual rate of head injuries in ancient Middle Eastern populations. “But the frequency of people walking around with healed or healing head wounds during various time periods suggests that interpersonal violence, especially among men, was constant and took its toll,” remarks anthropologist Debra Martin of the University of Nevada, Las Vegas.

Survivors of these types of head wounds would have experienced symptoms such as migraines, blurry vision and slowed decision making, says Martin, a coeditor of the journal that published the new study.

Comment
Print Friendly and PDF

H. Cohen et al. Trauma to the skull: A historical perspective from the southern Levant (4300BCE - 1917CE). International Journal of Osteoarchaeology. doi:10.1002/oa.2258. Abstract available: [Go to]


B. Bower. Dawn of the city. Science News, Vol. 173, February 9, 2008, p. 90. Available online: [Go to]

For more on Israel Hershkovitz: [Go to]

Comments (3)

Please alert Science News to any inappropriate posts by clicking the REPORT SPAM link within the post. Comments will be reviewed before posting.

  • If one assumes these injuries are not from falls or accidents of falling objects. I doubt that the Middle East is inherently more violent. That is illogical. The more violent culture would take less care with it's injured and dead. It could also be the medical care for the living injured was better. There could also be more care taken in the burial of individual's in the culture where these bones were found.
    Eliyahu Konn Eliyahu Konn
    Jul. 20, 2012 at 10:40am
  • Or maybe living the the desert isn't very fun....
    Brent Moser Brent Moser
    Jul. 23, 2012 at 10:18am
  • Yes, Eliyahu Kohn is correct. The Middle East is definately NOT inherently more violent. The title for this article could have been " Violence Goes Way Back for Almost All Cultures." What the bioarchaeological record combined with ethnohistoric and other lines of evidence suggest is that violence is a very old cultural behavior that has played a role in human groups for a very long time. At the same time, archaeological investigations also demonstrate the ways that cooperation and collaboration also have shaped human groups. Culturally sanctioned violence such as warfare needs to be seen in the broader context of solving problems. If violence is the answer, what was the question? This approach puts violence in a context that can be better explained, and in the future, replaced with other kinds of solutions.
    Debra Martin, UNLV
    Debra Martin Debra Martin
    Jul. 23, 2012 at 10:18am
Registered readers are invited to post a comment. To encourage fruitful discussion, please keep your comments relevant, brief and courteous. Offensive, irrelevant, nonsensical and commercial posts will not be published. (All links will be removed from comments.)

You must register with Science News to add a comment. To log-in click here. To register as a new user, follow this link.

Follow Us