Web edition: July 18, 2012
Exposure to increasing amounts of egg every day over two years can seemingly rid some children of an egg allergy, a new study finds. This gradual introduction into the diet appears to re-train the immune system, allowing some sensitive children to handle egg proteins even after treatment ends, researchers report in the July 19 New England Journal of Medicine.
Many other children in the study developed an ability to cope with small amounts of egg without a serious reaction — but only while being treated. That finding could nonetheless have benefits.
“If you’re a parent who has a child who’s allergic, there is much more interest in providing protection from an accidental reaction” than in having the child gain a new food group, says study coauthor Wesley Burks, a pediatric immunologist at the University of North Carolina in Chapel Hill. “If you can give them something to protect them, that’s what a parent wants.”
Burks and a U.S. team identified 55 children ages 5 to 11 with egg allergies, confirmed by skin-prick tests, medical history and the presence of antibodies to egg protein. All of them got an unmarked powder added to their food daily. Forty kids were randomly assigned to receive the egg treatment and 15 got cornstarch as a control. The treatment amounted to a few grains of powdered egg white on the first day and gradually grew to the equivalent of one-third of an egg.
After 22 months, 30 of the 40 children getting the treatment were able to consume 10 grams of powdered egg white without having a visible reaction, such as wheezing. Five of the 40 did have a reaction to the egg test, as did all children in the placebo group. Another five children who had allergic reactions to the initial treatment dropped out of the study early on.
Four to six weeks after stopping treatment, the children who didn’t react to the egg test got tested again, this time with 10 grams of egg white powder plus a cooked egg. Eleven passed that test. A year later, 10 of them were eating eggs at will.
“I think this is very promising,” says Mary Beth Bollinger, a pediatric allergist at the University of Maryland School of Medicine in Baltimore. One of the remaining challenges will be to identify beforehand which children are the most likely to benefit from the treatment. Such predictions may emerge from tests of their immune cells and proteins, she says.
In this study, blood tests of kids whose treatment succeeded showed an accumulation of positive immune changes during treatment, particularly of factors implicated in the inflammation that marks a serious allergic reaction. Whether those changes are permanent is unknown and will be addressed in future work, Burks says.
Overall, about 10 percent of children given this type of oral treatment for egg, peanut or milk allergies — including roughly that fraction in this study — have reactions early and drop out, Burks says. “For a small group of kids, this isn’t the right therapy.”
And the study’s results do come with a warning: Don’t try this at home. The Food and Drug Administration would need to approve an oral treatment for clinical use.
“This study does offer hope that in the next few years a treatment could be developed,” Burks says, “but we’re not there yet.”
Citations
A. W. Burks et al. Oral immunotherapy for treatment of egg allergy in children. New England Journal of Medicine, Volume 367, July 19, 2012, p. 233. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1200435
Suggested Reading
S.M. Jones et al. Clinical efficacy and immune regulation with peanut oral immunotherapy. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Volume 124, August 2009, p. 292. [Go to]
P. Meglio et al. A protocol for oral desensitization in children with IgE-mediated cow’s milk allergy. Allergy, Volume 59, September 2004, p. 980. DOI: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2004.00542.x
N. Seppa. Gradual treatment of peanut allergies shows promise. Science News. Volume 175, April 11, 2009, p. 11. Available online: [Go to]
N. Seppa. Food allergy advice may be peanuts. Science News. Volume 174, December 6, 2008, p. 8. Available online: [Go to]
J.M. Skripak et al. A randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled study of milk oral immunotherapy for cow’s milk allergy. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Volume 122, December 2008, p. 1154. [Go to]
Please alert Science News to any inappropriate posts by clicking the REPORT SPAM link within the post. Comments will be reviewed before posting.
My son, unfortunately, has a worse peanut allergy, so we carry a epi-pens for him. His allergist has mentioned desensitization protocols in testing that would likely be available soon. Meantime, our home is peanut-free, and my own desensitization has been on hold. As a result, I have noticed some increased sensitivity in myself on those few occasions when I can have some, but still not as bad as it was at first.
Anecdotes are not as significant as statistics, but it's nice when they agree. :)
This folk medicine approach to allergy gets revived every generation or so, and eventually gets discredited by real evidence... again.
Homeopathy requires an extremely low dosage and never increases it, while this experiment promotes gradual increment to reintroduce said substance to the body's immune system.
You must register with Science News to add a comment. To log-in click here. To register as a new user, follow this link.