Quantcast
issue
Read articles, including Science News stories written for ages 9-14, on the SNK website.
Exoplanet pair orbits two stars
Outer orb sits in habitable zone of binary star system
A+ A- Text Size

Outer orb sits in habitable zone of binary star system

By Nadia Drake

Web edition: August 28, 2012
Print edition: October 6, 2012; Vol.182 #7 (p. 12)

Enlarge
Kepler-47, illustrated here, is the first transiting multiplanet system found around two stars. The outer planet is in the system’s life-friendly zone, though it is bigger than Uranus and likely incapable of hosting life.
NASA, JPL-Caltech, T. Pyle

BEIJING — And then there were two. The Kepler spacecraft has spied the first pair of planets passing in front of the binary star system they orbit. Adding spice is that the outer planet — a potential Neptune-like world — inhabits the life-friendly zone around the two stars.

“It receives about 88 percent the amount of energy the Earth receives from the sun,” said William Welsh of San Diego State University on August 29 at the International Astronomical Union meeting. “And it’s a multiple planet system. It’s hard enough to imagine how you get one planet in the binary; now we have two.”

The system, called Kepler-47, could have even more planets: A tantalizing but unconfirmed hint of an additional world lurks in the blinking starlight produced when the planetary companions pass between the two stars and Earth. The additional blink has been seen clearly just once, so more observing time would be needed to confirm a third planet. 

Kepler-47, which is also described online August 28 in Science, further demonstrates the hardiness of planets. "Circumbinary multiple-planet systems were fully to be expected, given that single planet versions have been found," says astronomer Greg Laughlin of the University of California, Santa Cruz. "But it's exciting nonetheless." Now there's evidence that more than one planet at a time can form and survive in the tumultuous environment around a binary star.

So far, scientists know that the outer planet, Kepler-47c, is roughly 4.6 times wider than Earth and that it goes around the stars every 303 days. The inner planet, Kepler-47b, is three times wider than Earth, and whips around the stars every 49 days. One of the stars is similar to the sun, and the other is much smaller and dimmer. The two stars orbit one another in roughly 7.5 days, a whirling duo some 5,000 light-years away in the constellation Cygnus.

Determining the boundaries of the habitable zone in binary systems isn’t as simple as for single stars, because the moving stars create a shifting region in which liquid water could survive on an orbiting planet. 

At the meeting, several scientists talked about ways to determine where the habitable zone lies in binary star systems — including those in which a planet orbits just one of the stars. In such a case, the second star can influence the amount of energy a planet receives, though indirectly. "The second star never comes that close to the planet; otherwise the system would be unstable," said Elke Pilat-Lohinger of the University of Vienna. Instead, the second star's gravity can yank or push on the planet, moving it around relative to its host and thus changing the habitable zone.

For planets circling two stars, habitable zones mostly depend on the average amount of energy the stellar pair produces, though the extreme temperatures a planet might encounter are also important, said Welsh.

Whether a planet in the life-friendly zone can host life ultimately depends on the planet itself — what it's made of, what its atmosphere is, and whether its clouds are insulating, said Nader Haghighipour of the University of Hawaii at Manoa. "It depends on your central star and also on your planet," he said.

So though Kepler-47c is clearly in the habitable zone, the planet itself is probably too big and gassy to host life. But that doesn't mean a large, Earth-sized moon couldn't serve as an exo-incubator. “It’s pure speculation,” Welsh said. “But being in the habitable zone, if it had a big moon around it, it’s in the right place to have the conditions you would need for life.”

There is no evidence of such a large moon, but smaller ones, more like Saturn’s moon Titan, could be present. “If this object had a moon the size of Titan, that could be very interesting,” Welsh said.

Comment
Print Friendly and PDF

J.A. Orosz et al. Kepler-47: A transiting circumbinary multiplanet system. Science. Published online August 28, 2012. doi: 10.1126/science.1228380.

W. Welsh et al. Recent Kepler results on circumbinary planets. International Astronomical Union General Assembly meeting, August 29, 2012, Beijing.

N. Haghighipour and L. Kaltenegger. Habitability of planet-hosting binary systems: calculating habitable zone for circumprimary and circumbinary planets. International Astronomical Union General Assembly meeting, August 29, 2012, Beijing.

E. Pilat-Lohinger et al. On the habitability of terrestrial planets in binary star systems. International Astronomical Union General Assembly meeting, August 29, 2012, Beijing.


N. Drake. Super-Earth spotted in life-friendly zone. Vol. 181, March 10, 2012, p. 14.
[Go to]

N. Drake. First Earth-sized planets netted. Science News. Vol. 181, January 14, 2012, p. 10.
[Go to]

N. Drake. Distant world looks ripe for life. Science News. Vol. 180, December 31, 2011, p. 11.
[Go to]

R. Cowen. Kepler craft reports apparent planetary bonanza. Science News. Vol. 178, July 3, 2010, p. 11. [Go to]

Comments (4)

Please alert Science News to any inappropriate posts by clicking the REPORT SPAM link within the post. Comments will be reviewed before posting.

  • Is Kepler really sensitive enough to detect an Earth-like moon in orbit around a Neptune-sized planet in a binary star system?
    Robert Woodman Robert Woodman
    Aug. 29, 2012 at 9:45am
  • "Is Kepler really sensitive enough to detect an Earth-like moon in orbit around a Neptune-sized planet in a binary star system?"

    No, it isn't. The scientists were just pointing out that if a gassy (uninhabitable) planet in the habitable zone had a moon, the moon itself could possibly support life.
    jose willow jose willow
    Aug. 30, 2012 at 9:22am
  • Astronomers assume that the circumbinary planets formed further out in the protoplanetary disk by accretion before migrating inward toward the binary stellar pair.

    An alternative solar system model suggests that super earth-sized planets and larger typically form in pairs by gravitational collapse of an enriched dust clump orbiting a single member of a binary stellar pair.

    These 'quasi-stellar planets' (QSPs) often form in 'planetary duos' due to excess angular momentum of the collapsing dust clump and are gravitationally bound to their progenitor member of the binary 'stellar duo', putting them in a pulsating orbit that drives core collapse, raising the orbits of the QSPs at the expense of the energy and angular momentum of the binary stellar pair.

    This energy and angular momentum transfer from the stellar pair to the planetary pair raises the QSP orbits, causing the stellar pair to 'spiral in' and eventually merge in a luminous red nova (LRN), like the one that may have occurred in our own solar system at 4.567 Ga due to 3 pairs of twin-planet QSPs, Venus & Earth, Jupiter & Saturn and Uranus & Neptune.

    So Mars may be typical in size for planets formed by accretion in a protoplanetary disk, rather than atypically small as is commonly assumed.
    David Carlson David Carlson
    Aug. 30, 2012 at 9:22am
  • Hi Robert -- There actually is a project that looks for exomoons in the Kepler data. It's called the Hunt for Exomoons with Kepler, and is spearheaded by David Kipping of the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics.

    There's a preprint describing the study on arXiv.org -- I'm not allowed to link to it in this comment, but if you search the arXiv for 1201.0752v2, it should pop up. First author is D. Kipping. (It's since been published in The Astrophysical Journal, but that's behind a paywall)

    Essentially, the hypothesis is that large moons (0.1-0.2 Earth-mass and greater) could reveal themselves by perturbing a planet's orbit or affecting the characteristics of the dips in starlight seen by the Kepler spacecraft. A sufficiently massive moon may tug enough on its planet to cause slight -- but detectable -- deviations from a calculated orbit. And imagine a situation in which, during several of the planet's transits, the moon happens to be in front of or behind the planet -- versus directly lined up between the planet and Earth. The dips in light could reveal the moon's presence, especially if it's large and on a sufficiently wide orbit.

    The question of whether such large moons exist is unanswered. The largest moon in the solar system, Ganymede, is only 0.025 Earth-masses. But as you'll see, the paper describes how such large moons could form and evolve, including possibilities such as impact formation and capture by large planets (see sections 2.1-2.7 for a good overview).

    Cheers, and enjoy!
    nadia
    Nadia Drake Nadia Drake
    Aug. 31, 2012 at 9:34am
Registered readers are invited to post a comment. To encourage fruitful discussion, please keep your comments relevant, brief and courteous. Offensive, irrelevant, nonsensical and commercial posts will not be published. (All links will be removed from comments.)

You must register with Science News to add a comment. To log-in click here. To register as a new user, follow this link.

Follow Us