Quantcast
issue
Read articles, including Science News stories written for ages 9-14, on the SNK website.
Another potentially habitable world emerges
Planet orbits a common dwarf star, suggesting more may be out there
A+ A- Text Size

Planet orbits a common dwarf star, suggesting more may be out there

By Nadia Drake

Web edition: August 31, 2012
Print edition: October 6, 2012; Vol.182 #7 (p. 12)

Enlarge
Gliese 163c (illustration, left; false-color image, right) was recently observed orbiting a star 50 light-years away. The planet lies within its star's habitable zone.
PHL/UPR Arecibo, IRSA/IPAC/NASA

BEIJING — A potentially habitable planet has been discovered orbiting the star Gliese 163, 50 light-years away. The planet is bigger than Earth — roughly seven times as massive — and resides near the inner edge of the star’s habitable zone, Thierry Forveille of France’s Observatoire de Grenoble reported on August 30 at the International Astronomical Union’s general assembly meeting. Depending on its composition and how insulating its atmosphere is, the planet could be capable of supporting life.

“I’d say that’s a habitable planet,” said Raymond Pierrehumbert of the University of Chicago. It’s unlikely the planet would experience any sort of runaway greenhouse effect that would heat it beyond the point of livability, he says.

Forveille and his colleagues found the planet by searching for wobbles in the planet’s host star with a telescope in Chile. Astronomers calculate that Gl 163c, as the planet is called, receives 30 to 40 percent more energy than Earth receives from the sun. Because the planet’s radius is unknown, it’s not yet clear what the planet is made of, but scientists speculate that it’s a mix of rock and water.

Gliese 163 is an M dwarf star, is smaller and dimmer than the sun, and hosts at least two planets. The innermost planet, Gl 163b, is 11 Earth masses and completes a revolution in just 8.6 days; next out is Gl 163c, with 7 Earth masses and an orbital period of 25.6 days. And there’s a third potential planet, a 20-Earth-mass body much farther out, with an orbital period of 669 days.

Searching for habitable planets around M dwarfs could be the fast track to finding a real Earth analog, astronomers say. “It’s easier to find and follow up on an Earth-size planet in the habitable zone of an M dwarf,” said Courtney Dressing of the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics.

These stars are smaller, so Earth-size planets are easier to find: They tug more on the star, and produce a bigger drop in brightness. And M dwarfs are common, comprising as much as 80 percent of the stars in the solar neighborhood. Because of that, there’s a good chance the Kepler spacecraft could spot an Earth-sized world around an M dwarf within 75 light-years from Earth, Dressing reported on August 30.

“This provides a lot of motivation for looking for Earth-sized planets around our smallest stars,” she said.  

Comment
Print Friendly and PDF

T. Forveille. The HARPS search for low-mass, habitable, transiting planets around M dwarfs. International Astronomical Union General Assembly, August 29, 2012, Beijing.

C. Dressing. Occurrence rate of habitable planets around M dwarfs: Estimates from Kepler. International Astronomical Union General Assembly, August 29, 2012, Beijing. 


N. Drake. Exoplanet pair orbits two stars. Science News Online, August 28, 2012.
[Go to]

N. Drake. Super-Earth spotted in life-friendly zone. Science News. Vol. 181, March 10, 2012, p. 14 http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/338148/title/Super-Earth_spotted_in_life-friendly_zone

N. Drake. Planet search finds lots of little guys. Science News. Vol. 180, October 22, 2001, p. 18.
[Go to] 

N. Drake. Super-Earths may come in two flavors. Science News. Vol. 180, October 10, 2011, p. 8.
[Go to]_

Comments (4)

Please alert Science News to any inappropriate posts by clicking the REPORT SPAM link within the post. Comments will be reviewed before posting.

  • SENSE OF REALTY
    -- James Ph. Kotsybar

    We think one day we’ll find another Earth
    encircling some other distant sun.
    It won’t be like the planet of our birth.
    Not one can stand up to comparison.

    If lucky, we’ll find one that’s the right mass --
    not to crush us with its gravitation --
    with atmosphere made of breathable gas
    (in our case, that means lots of oxygen).

    It should spin a twenty-four hour day.
    It’s orbit had better be stable, too,
    with axis tilted not too far away --
    for gentle seasons like we are used to.

    The climate should be warm enough to melt
    the ice into water to quench our thirst --
    no warmer than our home’s tropical belt --
    so other life will likely be there first.

    We’d like it landscaped with vegetation,
    but first we must send in robotic probes;
    before we establish a garrison,
    we’ll have to contend with native microbes.

    It also must have a magnetic field
    to deflect it’s stellar radiation
    and outer giants to make comets yield
    an orbital path free from devastation.

    And if its sun is anything like ours,
    it should have an ozone layer intact
    or UV rays will burn our skin to scars
    and cause our corneas to cataract.

    … far easier to solve our problems here
    than find fresh starts beyond our earthly sphere.
    Poeteye Poeteye
    Sep. 4, 2012 at 12:27pm
  • Why are we so concerned with other planets that can support life when we can barely take care of this one?
    david goodstein david goodstein
    Sep. 5, 2012 at 1:42pm
  • You have answered you're own question David. We need somewhere to go when we have stuffed up this place. ;) Though, as Poeteye notes, it would be easier to get things right here.
    Greygoat Greygoat
    Sep. 6, 2012 at 11:02am
  • David we are concerned with other possible life supporting planets so we can answer the question are we alone?

    Although as an environmentalist i do believe we need to take care of the we inhabit. it's likely the only one we'll ever have.
    Lee Rennie Lee Rennie
    Sep. 9, 2012 at 9:34pm
Registered readers are invited to post a comment. To encourage fruitful discussion, please keep your comments relevant, brief and courteous. Offensive, irrelevant, nonsensical and commercial posts will not be published. (All links will be removed from comments.)

You must register with Science News to add a comment. To log-in click here. To register as a new user, follow this link.

Follow Us