Quantcast
issue
Read articles, including Science News stories written for ages 9-14, on the SNK website.
Wild snakes reproduce without sex
Virgin birth not just a by-product of captivity
A+ A- Text Size

Virgin birth not just a by-product of captivity

By Susan Milius

Web edition: September 12, 2012
Print edition: October 20, 2012; Vol.182 #8 (p. 16)

Enlarge
MOTHER AND CHILD
A female copperhead has given birth to a son, shown coiled among her own coils, without any genetic contribution from a male of their species.
© Charles Smith & Pam Eskridge

Snakes in the wild sometimes forgo the mom-and-dad method of reproducing and have babies without having sex, researchers have confirmed with genetic testing.

Occasional no-sex reproduction has been seen in captivity among snakes, Komodo dragons and sharks. But until now there has been no conclusive evidence for wild virgin birth among species that normally reproduce sexually, says Warren Booth of the University of Tulsa in Oklahoma. (In about 80 kinds of vertebrates, a single sex carries on the species quite well on its own.)

Booth and his colleagues examined dozens of litters of wild-caught copperheads and cottonmouths. The team found one case in each species of a male baby born without littermates. Genetic testing showed that these babies’ maternal and apparently paternal DNA was identical at multiple locations, making the chances that a daddy snake actually was involved in the reproductive process vanishingly small. The researchers report their findings online September 12 in Biology Letters.
Comment
Print Friendly and PDF

W. Booth et al. Facultative parthenogenesis discovered in wild vertebrates. Biology Letters. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2012.0666. Available online: [Go to]

Comments (2)

Please alert Science News to any inappropriate posts by clicking the REPORT SPAM link within the post. Comments will be reviewed before posting.

  • I can understand how a female snake can produce a female snake without a male partner; but how can a female snake produce a male snake without a male partner?
    Robert Powell Robert Powell
    Nov. 2, 2012 at 1:51pm
  • Because a set of male DNA contains less genetic information than a set of female DNA. You have heard of XX = female and XY = male. This graphically describes the fact that the male gene is missing a portion of that second X, making it appear like a Y. A female genetic set technically contains all the components of male DNA, and then some. I suppose that if the "and then some" was somehow discarded, the result would be simply male. I am not sure why this article specifies male babies. One would think that female virgin births would happen more readily. I am no expert, and clearly there is some undefined process here!
    ALYSSA DAVIDSON ALYSSA DAVIDSON
    Nov. 2, 2012 at 4:56pm
Registered readers are invited to post a comment. To encourage fruitful discussion, please keep your comments relevant, brief and courteous. Offensive, irrelevant, nonsensical and commercial posts will not be published. (All links will be removed from comments.)

You must register with Science News to add a comment. To log-in click here. To register as a new user, follow this link.

Follow Us