Quantcast
issue
Read articles, including Science News stories written for ages 9-14, on the SNK website.
Gulf Stream might be releasing seafloor methane
Greenhouse gas may be flowing into ocean waters off U.S. east coast
A+ A- Text Size

Greenhouse gas may be flowing into ocean waters off U.S. east coast

By Tanya Lewis

Web edition: October 24, 2012
Print edition: December 1, 2012; Vol.182 #11 (p. 12)

Enlarge
Methane hydrates in ocean sediment, like this one found off the coast of Oregon at a depth of about 1200 meters, could release a greenhouse gas as ocean waters heat up.
Wusel007/Wikimedia Commons

While it’s no ice-nine, a frozen form of methane trapped in ocean sediments could be cause for concern. Warm Gulf Stream waters off the east coast of North America are converting large amounts of the substance into methane gas, which could lead to underwater landslides and influence global climate.

A good portion of the biological carbon on Earth is stored in the seafloor as methane hydrate, a frozen mixture of methane and water formed at high pressure and low temperature. Changes in the temperature or direction of the Gulf Stream, which carries warm water north from the Gulf of Mexico, have heated sediments in a strip along the North Atlantic seafloor by 8 degrees Celsius, unlocking 2.5 billion metric tons of methane from deep-sea caches, scientists report in the Oct. 25 Nature.

This is the first study to suggest that methane hydrate melting is related to ocean currents themselves, says study coauthor Benjamin Phrampus, an Earth scientist at Southern Methodist University in Dallas. Previous studies suggested that the global ocean temperature would have to increase to cause hydrate breakdown, which would take a very huge input of energy, he says. “We don’t need this large amount of energy to explain this. It’s simply a change in the ocean currents.”

In Kurt Vonnegut’s 1963 novel Cat’s Cradle, the fictional substance ice-nine crystallizes all liquid water it touches, with the power to wipe out all life on Earth in an instant. The conversion of methane hydrate to gas isn’t nearly so apocalyptic, though. While methane is a much more potent greenhouse gas than CO2, at the depths it’s being released most of the methane will never reach the atmosphere. Instead, it will dissolve in seawater, where microbes will guzzle it up and convert it to CO2. Even if methane does reach the surface, its lifetime in air is only about 10 years.

To affect global warming, “you’d have to add quite a bit of methane to the atmosphere to really move the needle much,” says geophysicist Carolyn Ruppel of the U.S. Geological Survey in Woods Hole, Mass. Where it becomes a problem, Ruppel says, is if sediments retain the methane gas, which could make underwater slopes much more prone to landslides. These slides might release even more methane from the seabed or trigger tsunamis.

Unstable hydrates may have caused the giant Cape Fear slide in this region of the North Atlantic, and similar ones could release an order of magnitude more gas than what’s already escaping.

Sudden methane hydrate release has been proposed as the cause of global warming events like the Paleocene-Eocene thermal maximum, a rapid spike in global temperature of more than 5 degrees Celsius that occurred about 55 million years ago. Compared with the PETM, the amount of gas being released by hydrates off of the U.S. east coast is very small, says Phrampus, but he notes that “it’s very unlikely that this is the only part of the world where it’s occurring.”

The study relied on indirect measurements of seafloor temperature to infer that hydrates are disintegrating. These methane solids can form only in the top few hundred meters of ocean sediments. Below that, the Earth’s warm interior keeps methane a gas. Seismic signals revealed the depth where solid hydrates met gassy methane. Comparing this depth with theoretical predictions suggested that the region was probably cooler in the past, but changes in the Gulf Stream 5,000 years ago are causing it to heat up.

It’s like seeing a block of ice on a warm, sunny day, says Earth scientist Gerald Dickens of Rice University in Houston: You can infer that the ice is melting even if you can’t see it. By similar logic, from rising sediment temperatures scientists suspect that a big chunk of the frozen methane must be vaporizing, even without observing it directly.

Methane hydrates will be breaking down over the next few centuries if the Gulf Stream doesn’t cool off or shift its position. Because scientists don’t know how much methane hydrate is out there or how much gas could be released, however, the impact on global climate remains unclear.

“I think we really have to keep an open mind on this right now,” Dickens says.

Comment
Print Friendly and PDF

B. Phrampus and M. Hornbach. Recent changes to the Gulf Stream causing widespread gas hydrate destabilization. Nature. doi: 10.1038/nature11528. [Go to]


A. Goho. Energy on Ice. Science News, Vol. 167, June 25, 2005, p. 410. Available online: [Go to]

R. Monastersky. Global Burp Gassed Ancient Earth. Science News, Vol. 156, Oct. 23, 1999, p. 260. Available online: [Go to]

R. Monastersky. The Ice That Burns. Science News, Vol. 154, Nov. 14, 1998, p. 312. Available online: [Go to]

Comments (6)

Please alert Science News to any inappropriate posts by clicking the REPORT SPAM link within the post. Comments will be reviewed before posting.

  • I have read in the past that such sudden releases of methane decrease buoyancy of surface ships and possibly cause them to sink. Could the Gulf Stream be the cause of some Bermuda Triangle disappearances?
    Daniel Suggs Daniel Suggs
    Oct. 25, 2012 at 9:35am
  • I immediately thought of the same thing! Not mentioned in the article,bit of a disappointment.Ron McGregor
    RK McGregor RK McGregor
    Oct. 30, 2012 at 9:58pm
  • This has been hypothesized in the past. It seems likely. A big burst of bubbles would reduce the buoyancy of the water above it and any ship passing over it would sink like a rock.
    Sunwyn Sunwyn
    Nov. 12, 2012 at 12:28pm
  • "Previous studies suggested that the global ocean temperature would have to increase to cause hydrate breakdown, which would take a very huge input of energy, he says. 'We don’t need this large amount of energy to explain this. It’s simply a change in the ocean currents.'”

    "While methane is a much more potent greenhouse gas than CO2, at the depths it’s being released most of the methane will never reach the atmosphere. Instead, it will dissolve in seawater, where microbes will guzzle it up and convert it to CO2. Even if methane does reach the surface, its lifetime in air is only about 10 years."

    "Sudden methane hydrate release has been proposed as the cause of global warming events like the Paleocene-Eocene thermal maximum, a rapid spike in global temperature of more than 5 degrees Celsius that occurred about 55 million years ago."

    "...the region was probably cooler in the past, but changes in the Gulf Stream 5,000 years ago are causing it to heat up."

    Oh, so this has been going on for maybe 5,000 years?

    Since it is a mere change in ocean currents, probably 5000 years ago at that, it has nothing to do with anthropogenic global warming.

    The fact that methane tends to be eaten by microbes before reaching the surface, converting to much less "potent" CO2, would contradict the theory that the Paleocene-Eocene thermal maximum was caused by sudden hydrate release.

    How would it be released? By an enormous underwater eruption that would contribute a lot of heat to the ocean and atmosphere from the interior of the planet? There have been several that huge, but blaming the sudden temperature spike on a huge methane release from the oceans' depths seems to ignore the cause of said release that may or may not have actually happened.

    CO2 is currently around 385 parts per million, or 0.0385% of the total atmosphere. Methane is measured at less than 2000 parts per billion, or less than 0.0002%. No one has shown me how such small fractions of the atmosphere could cause any significant warming, especially when warming increases those gases by decomposition. How do you separate cause and effect? Temperatures and CO2 levels don't even correlate that well.

    I like the Bermuda Triangle speculation in the comments, however. It should be explored. The earth is subject to huge burps of CO2 and probably methane as well.
    Rycke Brown Rycke Brown
    Feb. 12, 2013 at 9:52am
  • "Gulf Stream might be releasing seafloor methane

    "Greenhouse gas may be flowing into ocean waters off U.S. east coast"

    "Warm Gulf Stream waters off the east coast of North America are converting large amounts of the substance into methane gas, which could lead to underwater landslides and influence global climate."

    Once again, the first sentence contradicts the headline and subhead. Make up your mind. Either the warm waters "are converting" methane, or they "might be" and "may be."

    Rycke Brown Rycke Brown
    Feb. 12, 2013 at 9:53am
  • I notice that the commentators on this site are mostly anti-AGW-alarmist, which is not the case on more general news sites like the Oregonian. It's probably because the readers here are fewer and far more scientifically literate.
    Rycke Brown Rycke Brown
    Feb. 12, 2013 at 11:08am
Registered readers are invited to post a comment. To encourage fruitful discussion, please keep your comments relevant, brief and courteous. Offensive, irrelevant, nonsensical and commercial posts will not be published. (All links will be removed from comments.)

You must register with Science News to add a comment. To log-in click here. To register as a new user, follow this link.

Follow Us