Quantcast
issue
Read articles, including Science News stories written for ages 9-14, on the SNK website.
Astronomers spot leftover light from ancient stars
Photons leave their mark in high-energy radiation from powerful galaxies
A+ A- Text Size

Photons leave their mark in high-energy radiation from powerful galaxies

By Nadia Drake

Web edition: November 1, 2012
Print edition: December 15, 2012; Vol.182 #12 (p. 8)

Enlarge
Cosmic beacons
Astronomers used 150 blazars (green dots) to detect photons from the universe’s first stars. The map shows the sky in gamma rays, with the Milky Way shown in orange.
NASA, DOE, Fermi LAT Collaboration

Light from the universe’s very first stars still lingers in space. Now, astronomers have a new way to catch it: Distant, ultra-bright galaxies that act as cosmic beacons, capturing relict photons in a blaze of gamma rays.

But it’s not just these earliest photons that are snared; photons from every star that ever shone can be captured. “We now have constraints on the total number of stars that ever formed,” Volker Bromm, an astronomer at the University of Texas at Austin, says of the new way to see old light, described online November 1 in Science. “It provides us with a review of the entire history of cosmic star formation, including the very first epochs of star formation in the very early universe.”

Studying these stellar fingerprints will help astronomers learn more about the universe’s earliest years — and its first inhabitants, which are too far away to be seen directly. Now roughly 13.7 billion years old, the universe is thought to have switched on the first stars about 400 million years after the Big Bang.

“Detecting these stars is very important but currently impossible,” says astrophysicist Marco Ajello of the Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology at Stanford and a coauthor of the new study. “In this way, we are already able to set constraints on the amount and role of these stars in the early universe.”

Normally, it’s tricky to separate relict starlight from everything else that’s shining in the universe. Dust, visible starlight, glowing material chucked out of supermassive black holes — it’s all rattling around out there, muddying the signatures of primordial stars. “If we were located outside the Milky Way, then we could have measured the background light more easily,” says Avi Loeb, an astrophysicist at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics. “We are embedded too deep inside the galaxy.”

To circumvent this problem, Ajello and his colleagues used the orbiting Fermi Large Area Telescope to study distant blazars, a type of bright, active galaxy. Blazars are powered by supermassive black holes that shoot enormous jets of energy toward Earth. The jets include gamma rays, a high-energy form of radiation that can interact with photons from the early stars.

Photons colliding with a blazar’s gamma rays are converted into electrons and their antimatter particles, called positrons. The transition produces a dimming effect that the Fermi telescope can detect, and the amount of dimming corresponds to amount of photons between Earth and the blazar.

Since blazars are distributed across the universe, astronomers can use them to measure the photon fog at different ages, and calculate the contributions from early stars.

Ajello and his colleagues used 150 blazars to parse these early photons from the rest of the cosmic melee. So far, they’ve managed to peer at the shimmering universe as it appeared when it was just 4 billion years old, and the team plans to follow up with blazars at greater distances and earlier ages.

The measured amount of photons “limits the amount of light produced by earlier generations of stars and black holes,” Loeb says. “An early population of very massive stars is only allowed to exist when the universe was less than 500 million years old.”

These results suggest that early stars may have formed a bit more slowly than previously thought, Ajello says. Unlike today’s stars, which incorporate many heavier chemical elements, the first stars were primarily made of hydrogen — and they lived fast and died hard, Ajello says. “The first stars were in general more massive — up to hundreds of times as massive as the sun — hotter, brighter, and more short-lived.”

Comment
Print Friendly and PDF

M. Ackermann et al. The imprint of the extragalactic background light in the gamma-ray spectra of blazars. Science. Published online November 1, 2012. doi:10.1126/science.1227160.


N. Drake. Most distant quasar raises questions. Science News. Vol. 180, July 30, 2011, p. 12. [Go to]

R. Cowen. Lighting the universe. Science News. Vol. 180, July 30, 2011, p. 26. [Go to]

R. Cowen. First stars may still shine. Science News. Vol. 180, February 26, 2011, p. 18. [Go to]

Comments (2)

Please alert Science News to any inappropriate posts by clicking the REPORT SPAM link within the post. Comments will be reviewed before posting.

  • As a non-scientist, it seemed obvious even before this finding that the missing "dark" matter is in fact, light matter. Light must continue in a "straight" path of an expanding sphere until a force acts to alter its path. This light should have the effect of accelerating the expansion of the universe at an ever-increasing rate.
    Anthony Rabun Anthony Rabun
    Nov. 2, 2012 at 1:51pm
  • Dear Nadia,

    Thanks for our informative article.

    A similar article on the SNKids pages, "Twinkle, twinkle oldest stars", towards the end, states that

    "(...) most galaxies, are held together by a giant black hole in the center.",

    which is, of course, not true. The BH mass in our Galaxy has ~10^6 solar masses, while the Galaxy is ~10^6 times more massive, for instance, not counting its dark matter halo. It is the collective mass of the Galaxy that holds it together.

    So, perhaps that article might be slightly edited to correct that statement. Thanks.

    Mario Hummer Mario Hummer
    Nov. 28, 2012 at 7:31pm
Registered readers are invited to post a comment. To encourage fruitful discussion, please keep your comments relevant, brief and courteous. Offensive, irrelevant, nonsensical and commercial posts will not be published. (All links will be removed from comments.)

You must register with Science News to add a comment. To log-in click here. To register as a new user, follow this link.

Follow Us