Quantcast
issue
Read articles, including Science News stories written for ages 9-14, on the SNK website.
New pathway proposed for ancient flood
Meltwaters off northwestern Canada’s ice sheet would have shut down the ocean’s heat circulation 13,000 years ago
A+ A- Text Size

Meltwaters off northwestern Canada’s ice sheet would have shut down the ocean’s heat circulation 13,000 years ago

By Erin Wayman

Web edition: November 5, 2012
Print edition: December 29, 2012; Vol.182 #13 (p. 11)

Enlarge
Meltwater from the Laurentide ice sheet probably entered the North Atlantic via the Mackenzie Valley and the Arctic Ocean 13,000 years ago — not via the St. Lawrence Valley, new research suggests. The floodwaters would have weakened the ocean’s heat circulation and caused a cold spell.
A. Condron/Univ. of Massachusetts

Natural disasters in the Arctic aren’t always a sign of global warming. A catastrophic deluge of freshwater pouring into the Arctic Ocean from northwestern Canada might have triggered the planet’s last major cold spell nearly 13,000 years ago, a new study finds. That’s a different pathway than the standard explanation for this big chill.

New computer simulations indicate ocean currents would have transported the Arctic floodwaters to the North Atlantic near Greenland, where the freshwater would have disrupted the ocean’s circulation of heat. Freshwater flowing into the Atlantic through Canada’s Gulf of St. Lawrence — the previously hypothesized source of the flood — would have been carried too far south to disturb heat flow, researchers report online November 5 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

“We see a more accurate picture of where the water went in the past,” says coauthor Alan Condron, a physical oceanographer at the University of Massachusetts Amherst.

The 1,200-year-long cold spell, known as the Younger Dryas, interrupted a warm period 12,900 years ago when the massive ice sheet covering much of Canada was melting. During the cold snap, temperatures in parts of the Northern Hemisphere dropped to about 10 degrees Celsius colder than they are today.

In 1989, Wallace Broecker of Columbia University suggested the Younger Dryas resulted from an abrupt overflow of Lake Agassiz, a colossal pool of meltwater along the southern edge of Canada’s ice sheet. Broecker thought the water streamed into the Great Lakes, the St. Lawrence Valley and from there into the Atlantic. The flood would have carried as much as 1 million cubic meters of water per second over the course of a year, or about a Lake Erie every six days. The lighter freshwater sat on top of the ocean’s denser salt water, preventing normal ocean mixing in the North Atlantic. This shut down the conveyor belt that brings warm waters north, which caused temperatures to plummet. 

But since Broecker’s proposal, geologists haven’t found any traces of an ancient flood in the St. Lawrence Valley. And there’s no evidence that Lake Agassiz’s water levels suddenly dropped prior to the Younger Dryas, says Thomas Lowell, a glacial geologist at the University of Cincinnati in Ohio.

That led some researchers to suggest the flood might have originated somewhere along the northwestern part of the ice sheet, with water flowing north through the Mackenzie Valley and into the Arctic.

Condron and Peter Winsor of the University of Alaska Fairbanks examined both scenarios. They simulated how currents would move a torrent of freshwater through the ocean. A flood leaving the mouth of the St. Lawrence would have traveled south and met the Gulf Stream, which would have transported the freshwater about 3,000 kilometers too far south to really interfere with the ocean’s conveyor belt. This scenario suggests such a flood would have slowed heat circulation by just 14 percent.

In contrast, a flood through the Arctic’s Mackenzie Valley — taken by currents to the subpolar North Atlantic — would have weakened the ocean’s conveyor belt by as much as 32 percent. “Dumping water in the Arctic is a very efficient way to … cool the Northern Hemisphere,” says W. Richard Peltier, a physicist at the University of Toronto. The result fits with previous findings of boulders and gravels in the Mackenzie Valley that suggest a giant flood happened at the onset of the Younger Dryas. “This whole thing now hangs together beautifully,” Peltier says.

But there’s still one missing piece of the puzzle. Condron and Winsor assume most of the freshwater came from a melting dome of ice in northwestern Canada. Geologists have yet to find direct evidence that such a large pool of water actually existed, Lowell says. “We need to know whether that load of water was even available or not,” he says.

Condron plans to search for more geological clues of a Mackenzie Valley flood. He’s also running simulations of what might happen to the ocean’s conveyor belt in the future as Greenland’s ice sheet melts.

Comment
Print Friendly and PDF

A. Condron and P. Winsor. Meltwater routing and the Younger Dryas. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Published online November 5, 2012. doi:10.1073/pnas.1207381109. [Go to]

J.B. Murton et al. Identification of Younger Dryas outburst flood path from Lake Agassiz to the Arctic Ocean. Nature. Vol. 464, April 1, 2010, p. 740. doi:10.1038/nature08954. [Go to]


S. Perkins. As the last ice age waned, a great lake was born. Science News. Vol. 172, July 14, 2007, p. 30. [Go to]

K. Greene. Pack rat piles: rodent rubbish provides ice age thermometer. Science News. Vol. 168, September 24, 2005, p. 198. [Go to]

S. Perkins. Once upon a lake. Science News. Vol. 162, November 2, 2002, p. 283. [Go to]

Comments (5)

Please alert Science News to any inappropriate posts by clicking the REPORT SPAM link within the post. Comments will be reviewed before posting.

  • "The flood would have carried as much as 1 million cubic meters of water per second over the course of a year, or more than 100 Lake Eries every minute."

    1 million cubic meters = 0.00024 cubic miles
    volume of Lake Erie = 115.2 cubic miles

    therefore

    1 million cubic meters per second = 1 Lake Erie every 5 days 13 hours.

    But what's an error of almost 5 orders of magnitude!
    Charles Kopec Charles Kopec
    Nov. 6, 2012 at 10:39am
  • Is there any evidence of an increase in warming in the tropics during this time? Ocean circulation not so much warms the poles as it cools the tropics. Energy, whether from the Sun or forces on Earth generate heat. The ocean currents move heat away from the tropics. It is this heat that must be attenuated. Thunderstorms do much the same thing aas the ocean currents but on a smaller and more localized scale. Hot air rises, water vapor condenses, rain falls. It is a way to bleed off heat. If the flood waters blocked the ocean currents and kept warmth from reaching the poles then they also prevented the tropics from losing heat. Data that proves tropic warming is the next step in this flood theory.
    Ben Vincent Ben Vincent
    Nov. 6, 2012 at 10:39am
  • Mr. Kopec: Thanks for catching our error! The story has now been corrected.
    Kate Travis, Science News Kate Travis, Science News
    Nov. 6, 2012 at 11:00am
  • @ Ben Vincent: Isn't that data the Sahara desert??
    Ian Boelts Ian Boelts
    Nov. 12, 2012 at 12:26pm
  • Whoa here! Cold water sitting on top of hot water and not mixing how come that doesn't happen today? The Ice sheets were still melting. Yes England got colder and drier, not North America. The Sahara was then wet and a Savanah Because the mixing occurred farther south. Did Northern China and Siberia get colder at this time?
    John Zilka John Zilka
    Nov. 27, 2012 at 3:13pm
Registered readers are invited to post a comment. To encourage fruitful discussion, please keep your comments relevant, brief and courteous. Offensive, irrelevant, nonsensical and commercial posts will not be published. (All links will be removed from comments.)

You must register with Science News to add a comment. To log-in click here. To register as a new user, follow this link.

Follow Us