Quantcast
issue
Read articles, including Science News stories written for ages 9-14, on the SNK website.
Sea level rise overflowing estimates
Feedback mechanisms are speeding up ice melt
A+ A- Text Size

Feedback mechanisms are speeding up ice melt

By Tanya Lewis

Web edition: November 8, 2012

Enlarge
Global warming feedbacks are speeding up the rise of sea level, which is expected to rise 1 meter by 2100. If the East and West Antarctic ice sheets melted, waters would rise by about 80 meters, submerging Florida and the Gulf Coast.
Emanuel Soeding/Christian-Albrechts University; William Hay.

Sea levels may swell much higher than previously predicted, thanks to feedback mechanisms that are speeding up ice melt in Greenland and Antarctica.

Climate simulations need to take such feedbacks into account, William Hay, a geologist at the University of Colorado Boulder, told the Geological Society of America meeting in Charlotte, N.C., on November 4. So far the models haven’t incorporated such information because “it just makes them much more complicated,” he says.

Many scientists share Hay’s concerns, says geologist Harold Wanless of the University of Miami. “The rate at which ice melt and sea level rise is happening is far faster than anything predicted,” he says.

Global sea levels rose an average of about 15 centimeters over the past century. Current data suggest they will rise another 1 meter by the year 2100, and some scientists predict far more. But the 2007 report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change projected a rise of just 0.2–0.6 meters over the same time period. “The data weren’t available in 2007 to say Greenland and Antarctica were melting,” says earth scientist Benjamin Horton of the University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia. “Sea levels are going to be greater than the upper estimate of the 2007 IPCC, but the big question is, when?”

To help answer that question, Hay is looking at underappreciated feedbacks. For one thing, big infusions of freshwater in the Arctic — from melting sea ice and from northern rivers — are driving cold ocean currents away from the North Pole and bringing up warm ones. This process is helping melt Greenland’s ice sheet, which could cause sea level to change very quickly, Hay says. Also, Arctic melt is exposing large areas of dark water, which absorbs the sun’s heat instead of reflecting it like ice does. As a result, warmer temperatures are disrupting local weather. After a record melt in August, for example, the high-pressure weather system that keeps the Arctic in a deep freeze was seasonally replaced by a low-pressure system that sucked in warm air, causing even more melting. To top it all off, the Arctic Ocean and thawing permafrost are releasing methane, a powerful greenhouse gas that traps atmospheric heat and raises temperatures still more.

The last time Earth’s climate was as balmy as today was about 120,000 years ago, when the planet was 2–3° Celsius warmer and sea levels were 4–6 meters higher. Much of the Greenland ice sheet was melted then. “Those sea level change rates are very, very large, and that was under natural conditions, not the human perturbation that’s going on now,” says Hay.

And Greenland isn’t the only concern — Antarctica contains a vast amount of ice that, if emptied entirely into the ocean, would cause 80 meters of sea level rise. For years scientists suspected the Antarctic ice was frozen to the ground, but evidence now suggests there is liquid water under many regions, lubricating the ice base like a skating rink. The only things stopping that ice from sliding into the sea are ice shelves, which act like corks in a bottle, Hay says. As these ice shelves break up — as some are already doing — “it’s like taking the cork out of the bottle.”

Even modest sea level rise can have far-reaching impacts. Higher sea levels make it easier for storm surges — like those produced by Hurricane Sandy — to reach further inland and inflict damage, Wanless says. “The future of our coastal cities is at stake.”

Comment
Print Friendly and PDF

W. Hay. Could estimates of the rate of future sea-level rise be too low? Geological Society of America meeting, Charlotte, November 4, 2012. Abstract available: [Go to]


D. Powell. East Coast faces faster sea level rise. Science News, Vol. 182, July 28, 2012, p. 17. Available online: [Go to]

J. Raloff. Modern-day sea level rise rocketing. Science News, Vol. 180, July 16, 2011, p. 13. Available online: [Go to]

C. Russell. First wave. Science News, Vol. 175, February 28, 2009, p. 24. Available online: [Go to]

Comments (8)

Please alert Science News to any inappropriate posts by clicking the REPORT SPAM link within the post. Comments will be reviewed before posting.

  • Less than an inch a decade - let's cut out the scaremongering. The Antarctic sheet has > 80% of the world's ice and is growing slightly. Is this science or special pleading for funding?
    M JOHN Plodinec M JOHN Plodinec
    Nov. 12, 2012 at 11:55am
  • If the century started in 2000, we're now 1/8th of the way to the next century and so far sea level rise is either unremarkable of slowing down. To reach the 1 meter, it's gotta get climbing soon. That or people may want to pay more attention to measurements than unverified models. At the very least, provide justification for the claim “The rate at which ice melt and sea level rise is happening is far faster than anything predicted,” because I don't see it, not even in data from Boulder.
    Ric Werme Ric Werme
    Nov. 12, 2012 at 11:56am
  • Why must “Science” News cater to the gullible who eat everything up promoting AGW when paleoclimatologists and scientists of many disciplines have generated reams of data proving the opposite?

    Global temperature has decreased since peaking 8,000 before present, fluctuating during the Minoan, Roman and Medieval Warm Periods and Little Ice Age from which we are rebounding. Global temperature is also fluctuating in accordance with the 60 year cycle of the solar system center of gravity. It has been declining since 1998.

    Sea level has been rising at a constant rate of 0.3mm per year for the last 5,000 years and this rate has been steadily decreasing. Apparent sea level changes occur in various parts of the world due to subsidence or glacial isotonic rebound.

    Global temperature has both risen and dropped while CO2 has done the same and the opposite in the last 30,000 years.

    Check out the graphs. At accuracygenesis –flood –holcene
    Why must “Science” News prohibit links? Are they afraid of the truth?
    Bob White Bob White
    Nov. 12, 2012 at 11:59am
  • "Global sea levels rose an average of about 15 centimeters over the past century. Current data suggest they will rise another 1 meter by the year 2100, and some scientists predict far more. "

    Ridiculous .

    Suddenly the rate of sea level rise is going up by a factor of 7 or more just at this particular temperature ?

    This is NOT science .
    Bob Armstrong Bob Armstrong
    Nov. 12, 2012 at 12:04pm
  • Has anyone taken into account the introduction of carbon emissions from the fossil fuels used to operate the scientific bases in the Antarctica? It seems logical to me that this pollution of our southern most continent, although seemingly small, would be having a far more devastating effect on both the carbon measurements and the ice melt in the Antarctic. I truly wish scientists studying different branches of the scientific tree would get together and share data once in a while. The way our world works is not made up of separate individual pictures. It is one large picture made up of thousands of separate logic pixels working together to create the whole. It is hard to believe a report when you read another from a different branch of science that seems to have some of the answers. Science should be about the finding of facts not about egos.
    Stanley Zabecki Stanley Zabecki
    Nov. 19, 2012 at 10:13am
  • As a new follower of ScienseNews it strikes me that the headlines used are very biased towards "End of the world" climate change, and it is all human made.
    And when one reads the articles, almost none have this dramatic view. No! If one reads the articles, almost every scientist conclude that the world is changing, it has always done so. The habitat is use to changes and we cannot predict them.

    So why all this panic? End of days?

    Does it sell more copies at the cost of serious debate?
    Thomas Lindvang Thomas Lindvang
    Nov. 30, 2012 at 2:54pm
  • "Sea level rise overflowing estimates
    Feedback mechanisms are speeding up ice melt"

    "Sea levels may swell much higher than previously predicted, thanks to feedback mechanisms that are speeding up ice melt in Greenland and Antarctica."

    The first sentence falsifies the headline and subhead. That which "may" happen is not currently happening. "Overflowing" and "are speeding up" means that it is happening now.

    After that, I am not even interested in the rest of the article.
    Rycke Brown Rycke Brown
    Feb. 12, 2013 at 11:08am
  • if it did rise to anything noticable it would be very small change.
    kalieb watson kalieb watson
    Mar. 13, 2013 at 12:46pm
Registered readers are invited to post a comment. To encourage fruitful discussion, please keep your comments relevant, brief and courteous. Offensive, irrelevant, nonsensical and commercial posts will not be published. (All links will be removed from comments.)

You must register with Science News to add a comment. To log-in click here. To register as a new user, follow this link.

Follow Us