Quantcast
issue
Read articles, including Science News stories written for ages 9-14, on the SNK website.
First rock from the sun turns out to have ice
Frozen material at the planet’s poles likely came from comet or asteroid impacts
A+ A- Text Size

Frozen material at the planet’s poles likely came from comet or asteroid impacts

By Tanya Lewis

Web edition: November 30, 2012
Print edition: January 12, 2013; Vol.183 #1 (p. 17)

Enlarge
Ice spotted
New data from NASA’s MESSENGER spacecraft reveal bright spots (shown in yellow) on Mercury that are almost certainly ice.
NASA, Johns Hopkins Univ. Applied Physics Laboratory, Carnegie Institution of Washington, National Astronomy and Ionosphere Center, Arecibo Observatory

The sun-scorched surface of Mercury may be the last place you’d expect to find ice. But NASA’s MESSENGER spacecraft has found the strongest evidence yet of frozen water — and carbon-rich material — on the planet closest to the sun.

While Mercury itself couldn’t support life, the findings provide clues about how water and other vital ingredients ended up on Earth, perhaps delivered by comets or asteroids. “Studying this stuff elsewhere in the solar system is really relevant for the origin of life,” says UCLA planetary scientist David Paige.

He and other scientists describe the findings in three studies published online November 29 in Science.

In the early 1990s, Earth-based radar measurements hinted at the presence of ice when they found mysterious bright spots near Mercury’s poles. The new studies reveal that the spots are indeed water ice. Darker areas may be carbon-rich material blanketing the ice and insulating it from the sun.

“The combination of results has presented a beautiful case for water ice with hydrocarbon infusion,” says Ann Sprague, a planetary scientist at the University of Arizona who was not involved in the studies.

New observations of Mercury’s northern polar regions come from MESSENGER’s laser altimeter, which maps the planet’s topography and measures how reflective the surface is. Simulations of Mercury’s surface temperatures match the laser measurements. Inside shadowy, steep-walled craters temperatures are below -173° Celsius, so frozen water can exist, Paige and colleagues report. Bright areas coincide with regions predicted to be cold enough for ice to be stable, while the dark areas coincide with warmer regions thought to harbor ice only beneath the surface.

“It matched perfectly,” Paige says. “We actually see bright ice every place we expect to see it.” Temperature models also suggest the ice was once much more extensive but has retreated, leaving behind the darker deposits.

Another line of evidence for frozen water comes from MESSENGER’s neutron spectrometer, which detects how much hydrogen (and therefore, presumably, water) is present. Cosmic rays constantly bombard Mercury’s surface, breaking apart atomic nuclei and scattering neutrons. When the neutrons collide with hydrogen atoms, they lose energy and grind to a halt like a cue ball hitting a billiard ball, says planetary scientist David Lawrence of Johns Hopkins University.

The dearth of neutrons detected near Mercury’s north pole suggests a lot of hydrogen lies just below the planet’s surface, almost certainly as pure ice. The mass of ice could be up to a trillion metric tons.

Scientists think the ice and carbon-rich material probably arrived via comets and asteroids, in a constant pummeling that should mix up the top layers of the crust. “It’s like you’ve got a bunch of people with shovels, reworking the surface,” says Paige. The fact that the bright and dark spots have not yet been mixed in suggests the spots formed fairly recently, in geological terms.

Comment
Print Friendly and PDF

G. Neumann et al. Bright and Dark Polar Deposits on Mercury: Evidence for Surface Volatiles. Science. Published online November 29, 2012. [Go to]

D. Paige et al. Thermal Stability of Volatiles in the North Polar Region of Mercury. Science. Published online November 29, 2012. [Go to]

D. Lawrence et al. Evidence for Water Ice Near Mercury's North Pole from MESSENGER Neutron Spectrometer Measurements. Science. Published online November 29, 2012. [Go to]

Comments (4)

Please alert Science News to any inappropriate posts by clicking the REPORT SPAM link within the post. Comments will be reviewed before posting.

  • Maybe not so unusual as the largest hydrogen collector and furnace are in its proximity.
    genius 1248 genius 1248
    Dec. 3, 2012 at 3:25pm
  • It seems this is indicating something more interesting is occurring.

    For years I've understood that heavier elements certainly came from stellar explosions from the past, that the Sun and other stars are churning balls of hydrogen fusing into helium, and once the process hits a tipping point - boom - helium becomes the fuel for fusion in a different kind of star.

    But I've also read that the rapid expansion, "inflation" after the big bang is like a gas condensing - similar to the water vapor condensing on surfaces near a stove with a venting pressure cooker.

    Assuming these stellar fusion cycles might prefer to turn hydrogen to helium, to beryllium, to helium fusing with beryllium to formi carbon and beryllium fusing together forming oxygen (essentially preferring "even" elements) - I haven't seen any articles describing helium stars, beryllium stars, carbon & etc. stars.

    Black holes - or their interactions with nearby matter that never quite fall-in - would seem the best place to actually churn lighter elements into heavier elements if they were not such seemingly final repositories of matter.

    And taking into consideration the heat encountered by Kuiper belt ice falling toward the sun should melt the ice, vaporize the water and drive away the water molecules to someplace where the temperature allows re-condensation - in a similar fashion to heating and cooling coil in HVAC systems controlling humidity.

    Perhaps I am reaching for simple terrestrial analogies to processes that act much differently near the Sun or in space, but I'm curious if the Sun is actually producing and spitting out other elements than simply helium from the hydrogen fusion and perhaps Mercury is the first planet that captures those ejected elements?
    Pessimistic Optimist Pessimistic Optimist
    Dec. 3, 2012 at 3:25pm
  • -173 Celcius? That can't be right.
    Robert Walsh Robert Walsh
    Dec. 4, 2012 at 3:29pm
  • What factors (other than hype or hope) gave water (H2O) first choice in the possibilities? Why not Ethane (C2H6 or Methane (CH4) both rich in Hydrogen and reportedly present on other planetary neighbors. The article reports findings of Carbon and Hydrogen but nothing about Oxygen detection.
    And as for the -173 C, this could be ok. Absolute Zero = -273 C. So, we do have a little room to play with before we run into difficulties getting colder than the ~3 K (= ~ -270 C) of free space.
    J G J G
    Dec. 7, 2012 at 7:50pm
Registered readers are invited to post a comment. To encourage fruitful discussion, please keep your comments relevant, brief and courteous. Offensive, irrelevant, nonsensical and commercial posts will not be published. (All links will be removed from comments.)

You must register with Science News to add a comment. To log-in click here. To register as a new user, follow this link.

Follow Us