Quantcast
issue
Read articles, including Science News stories written for ages 9-14, on the SNK website.
Clutch of distant galaxies reveals the infant universe
Hubble spies stars lighting up the cosmic dawn
A+ A- Text Size

Hubble spies stars lighting up the cosmic dawn

By Alexandra Witze

Web edition: December 13, 2012
Print edition: January 12, 2013; Vol.183 #1 (p. 5)

Enlarge
Galaxies far far away
The deepest look yet into the distant universe reveals galaxies as they appear when the universe was less than 3 percent of its current age.
NASA, ESA, R. Ellis/Caltech and UDF12 team

Peering into the far reaches of the universe, astronomers have spotted seven galaxies so distant that they appear as they did less than 600 million years after the Big Bang.

Finding so many primordial galaxies allows scientists to pin down crucial questions about the newborn universe, such as when light from early stars and galaxies penetrated the early cosmic gloom.

“It’s the scientific study of Genesis,” says Avi Loeb, a Harvard astronomer who was not involved in the work.

The discovery comes from the hardworking Hubble Space Telescope, which in August and September spent more than 100 hours staring deeply into a small patch of sky. That region, in the southern constellation Fornax, is the same one that was targeted in 2009 for a long-duration exposure known as the Hubble Ultra Deep Field.

Astronomers led by Caltech’s Richard Ellis looked there again, but for longer exposure times and with an additional filter that’s sensitive to the faint, red light of faraway galaxies. The new census, to appear in an upcoming Astrophysical Journal Letters, includes seven galaxies at great distances — including one that might be the record-breaker of them all, seen as it was just 380 million years after the Big Bang.

Because the universe has been expanding since the Big Bang, 13.7 billion years ago, light from these very distant objects has only now finally arrived at Earth. That means these objects appear as they did during cosmic infancy. The distance to such faraway objects is usually stated in terms of redshift; the higher the redshift, the more distant the object.

The seven galaxies described by Ellis and his team all have redshifts higher than 8.5. One of them — a faint object spotted earlier by other astronomers (SN Online: 1/26/11) — may even be as high as redshift 11.9, Ellis says.

Another recent Hubble survey also found a handful of scattered, faraway galaxies with redshifts possibly in the range of 8.5 to 10. That survey relies on the gravitational influence of intervening galaxies to distort and magnify the light of distant galaxies behind them. In November, astronomers with that survey, known as CLASH, announced finding a galaxy with a redshift of 10.8 in the constellation Camelopardalis.

“Broadly speaking, their results are consistent with ours,” says James Dunlop, an astronomer at the University of Edinburgh who works with Ellis.

More important than any record-breaker, says Ellis, is what a census of distant galaxies can say about one of the early universe’s most important events, called cosmic reionization. Reionization happened when light from the first stars and galaxies permeated the opaque universe, breaking apart hydrogen atoms into electrons and protons and making the universe transparent to ordinary light.

That process started about 200 million years after the Big Bang, but astronomers aren’t sure exactly how it began. At some point the first stars ignited and gathered themselves into the first galaxies, but only when there were enough such stars and galaxies would they have illuminated the darkness. Knowing exactly how many galaxies there were, at what point in time, helps scientists understand whether reionization took place quickly or over time.

The new findings indicate that it might have been gradual. The number of early galaxies, spread out at different redshifts, suggests that they probably built up over time as stars amassed in the dense, hot environs of the early universe, says Ellis. “Cosmic dawn was probably not a single dramatic event,” he said in a December 12 news briefing.

Rogier Windhorst, an astronomer at Arizona State University in Tempe, says he’s surprised the new survey found only seven galaxies. More may be lurking in the data, hidden by the bright lights of other, closer stars or galaxies, he suggests. 

Any lingering questions may have to wait until the 2018 launch of the James Webb Space Telescope, the successor to Hubble that is designed to look in infrared wavelengths for the dim light of even more distant galaxies.

“We confidently predict there are many galaxies beyond this,” Ellis says.


Back Story | Cosmic Dawn


View larger image
Credit: NASA, ESA, A. Feild

The universe might have begun with a bang, but it remained dark for quite some time. A bleak period known as the cosmic “dark ages” stretched from about 400,000 years to 200 million years after the Big Bang. During this period the universe was filled with neutral hydrogen gas, which rendered everything murky and opaque. When the first stars ignited, they released ultraviolet radiation that essentially burned off the hydrogen fog. At first, individual stars cleared pockets within the fog; later, more stars began to form and collect into galaxies, clearing larger pockets of space until the entire universe was transparent. Astronomers call this process “cosmic reionization.” Soon stars also began forging heavier chemical elements, like carbon and iron, in their hearts. When the stars blew up and died, they spewed those elements into interstellar space, there to be incorporated into planets and people. Alexandra Witze

Comment
Print Friendly and PDF

R.J. Bouwens et al. Confirmation of the z~10 candidate UDFj-39546284 using deeper WFC3/IR+ACS+IRAC observations over the HUDF09/XDF. arXiv:1211.3105. [Go to]

R.J. Bouwens et al. A census of star-forming galaxies in the z~9-10 universe based on HST+Spitzer observations over 19 CLASH clusters: Three candidate z~9-10 galaxies and improved constraints on the star formation rate density at z~9.2. arXiv:1211.2230. [Go to]

D. Coe et al. CLASH: three strongly lensed images of a candidate z~11 galaxy. Astrophysical Journal, in press. [Go to]

R.S. Ellis et al. The abundance of star-forming galaxies in the redshift range 8.5 to 12: new results from the 2012 Hubble Ultra Deep Field campaign. Astrophysical Journal Letters, in press. [Go to]

W. Zheng et al. A magnified young galaxy from about 500 million years after the Big Bang. Nature. Vol. 489, September 20, 2012, p. 406. doi:10.1038/nature11446.
[Go to]


R. Cowen. A galaxy far, far, far away. Science News Online, January 26, 2011. [Go to]

R. Cowen. New-found galaxies may be farthest back in time and space yet. Science News. Vol. 177, January 30, 2010, p. 5. Available online: [Go to]

Hubble Ultra Deep Field 2012: [Go to]

Comments (3)

Please alert Science News to any inappropriate posts by clicking the REPORT SPAM link within the post. Comments will be reviewed before posting.

  • Forming a star in 380 million years seems reasonable, but starting from a chaotic soup of subatomic particles and forming an entire fundamental object like a galaxy in 380 million years seems to strain credibility to the limit.

    I think we are seeing the demise of the concept that the entire Universe, including space-time geometry, was "created" in a Big Bang 13.7 billion years ago.

    Far more likely, given the observations, is that there was a Little Bang 13.7 billion years ago, and the Little Bang was the explosion of a vast metagalactic object in analogy to a stellar scale supernova. The metagalactic object would be just one of countless others on a scale we can hardly imagine.

    Just as in the case of a supernova wherein subatomic particles existed before the supernova, so also would galaxies pre-exist the 13.7 billion year-old explosion of the metagalaxy.

    We have waited decades for an infinite fractal cosmological paradigm to be given a fair chance. Perhaps we are on the threshold of a major paradigm-change in cosmology.

    Robert L. Oldershaw
    Discrete Scale Relativity

    knecht knecht
    Dec. 14, 2012 at 2:29pm
  • How fast is our galaxy moving thru space and space expanding from these galaxies that it takes 13.32 billion years for the light from these early galaxies to just now reach us? If everything started from a singularity and we have had 13.8 billion years to move and expand away from that original point, would we need to travel at 13.32/13.8 (96.5%) the speed of light to be this far away from these galaxies to still see their light?

    Jerry B Jerry B
    Dec. 17, 2012 at 2:52pm
  • I have posed these same questions for years, no answers.
    AmericanGypsie AmericanGypsie
    Mar. 4, 2013 at 10:22am
Registered readers are invited to post a comment. To encourage fruitful discussion, please keep your comments relevant, brief and courteous. Offensive, irrelevant, nonsensical and commercial posts will not be published. (All links will be removed from comments.)

You must register with Science News to add a comment. To log-in click here. To register as a new user, follow this link.

Follow Us