Quantcast
issue
Read articles, including Science News stories written for ages 9-14, on the SNK website.
BOOK REVIEW: Regenesis: How Synthetic Biology Will Reinvent Nature and Ourselves
Review by Alexandra Witze

Buy this book

A+ A- Text Size

Review by Alexandra Witze

By George Church and Ed Regis

Web edition: December 27, 2012
Print edition: January 12, 2013; Vol.183 #1 (p. 30)

Enlarge

Reading the first book penned by Church, a Harvard biologist and polymath, is like falling down a rabbit hole straight into his fermenting brain.

Church’s wide-ranging career includes developing novel methods for reading the genetic instruction manual, or genome, of creatures from bacteria to humans. Now he focuses on synthesizing those instructions from scratch. Church doesn’t just think that the new field of synthetic biology (see Page 22) will change your life. He claims it will also change your world and notion of your place within it.

Why not, after all, synthesize a Neandertal? Church and his coauthor explore the Neandertal genome and how modern humans could be used as a template to re-create one — should society be willing to accept building a Neandertal child in the laboratory. Or how about pushing into transhumanism, the concept that genes could be engineered to give people mental or physical capabilities well beyond their ordinary means?

Such philosophical musings are tethered to reality by long passages describing the gory details of how molecular and cellular systems work. Church also explains everything and then some about many of his inventions, such as “multiplex automated genome engineering,” which breaks apart DNA and mutates small sections of it to test for the evolutionarily fittest versions. This is not a book for the biologically faint of heart.

But it is a dizzying survey of how scientists have unearthed the secrets of living organisms and are now using that information to revamp life itself. Whether that information will be used to build a Neandertal remains to be seen. 

Basic Books, 2012, 284 p., $28

Comment
Print Friendly and PDF

Comments (1)

Please alert Science News to any inappropriate posts by clicking the REPORT SPAM link within the post. Comments will be reviewed before posting.

  • I suggest what scientists need to develop is respect for and understanding of the pressent ecology of our planet our only home. Respect, lots of respect.
    Peter Peters, Bangkok
    Peter Peters Peter Peters
    Jan. 2, 2013 at 2:31pm
Registered readers are invited to post a comment. To encourage fruitful discussion, please keep your comments relevant, brief and courteous. Offensive, irrelevant, nonsensical and commercial posts will not be published. (All links will be removed from comments.)

You must register with Science News to add a comment. To log-in click here. To register as a new user, follow this link.

Follow Us