Quantcast
issue
Read articles, including Science News stories written for ages 9-14, on the SNK website.
News in Brief: Wrist bones said to distinguish hobbits
New fossils enter debate over tiny humanlike species that lived in Indonesia
A+ A- Text Size

New fossils enter debate over tiny humanlike species that lived in Indonesia

By Bruce Bower

Web edition: January 9, 2013
Print edition: February 9, 2013; Vol.183 #3 (p. 18)

Three new hobbit wristbones unearthed on the Indonesian island of Flores support the contested idea that these half-sized individuals belonged to a species called Homo floresiensis, scientists conclude in a paper published online January 4 in the Journal of Human Evolution. The new finds, as well as the wrist of a previously reported hobbit skeleton, differ markedly from human wrists, says a team led by anthropologist Caley M. Orr of Stony Brook University in New York. Hobbits’ wrists limited their ability to make and use stone tools, the scientists contend. Basic stone cutting implements excavated on Flores date to 800,000 years ago. Hobbits died out around 17,000 years ago, after having descended from a member of the human evolutionary family that must have reached Indonesia by 1 million years ago, the researchers propose (SN: 5/8/10, p. 14).  Other researchers consider hobbits to have been human pygmies.

Comment
Print Friendly and PDF

C. Orr et al. New wrist bones of Homo floresiensis from Liang Bua (Flores, Indonesia). Journal of Human Evolution. Published online Jan. 4, 2013. doi:10.1016/j.jhevol.2012.10.003. Abstract available: [Go to]


B. Bower. Hobbit debate goes out on some limbs. Science News. Vol. 177, May 8, 2010, p. 14. Available online: [Go to]

Comments (3)

Please alert Science News to any inappropriate posts by clicking the REPORT SPAM link within the post. Comments will be reviewed before posting.

  • I hadn't heard the human pygmy counterargument. Only one skull was found among, if I recall, seven individuals and this skull was thought to be an adult microcephalic modern human. That counterargument always seemed far-fetched - microcephaly is extremely rate and it is extremely unlikely that a prehistoric microcephalic could survive to adulthood and extremely unlikely that that the only skull found among a group of fossil skeletons would be that rare individual.
    Darryl Troester Darryl Troester
    Jan. 10, 2013 at 9:09pm
  • Bruce I'd suggest the idea differences in wrist bones automatically made floresiensis more limited than us in their capacity to make and use stone tools's somewhat obviated by the fact possession of beaks and claws hasn't stopped some species of birds demonstrating complex tool making abilities and then there're those humans who for lack of arms've learnt to play the guitar with their feet or paint fine art with their teeth.

    Ditto the implication their smaller brains automatically reduced them to a much lower intelligence than our own's surely obviated by over one hundred known examples of fully functioning humans with little or no brains.
    alan borky alan borky
    Jan. 14, 2013 at 2:48pm
  • I've heard the authors of the report on other programs. What they say is that the Hobbit could have used stone tools, but would have had a harder time and would have suffered more conditions like arthritis.
    Mark S. Mark S.
    Feb. 7, 2013 at 9:59am
Registered readers are invited to post a comment. To encourage fruitful discussion, please keep your comments relevant, brief and courteous. Offensive, irrelevant, nonsensical and commercial posts will not be published. (All links will be removed from comments.)

You must register with Science News to add a comment. To log-in click here. To register as a new user, follow this link.

Follow Us