Web edition: January 29, 2013
Print edition: February 23, 2013; Vol.183 #4 (p. 14)
Domestic cats kill many more wild birds in the United States than scientists thought, according to a new analysis. Cats may rank as the biggest immediate danger that living around people brings to wildlife, researchers say.
America’s cats, including housecats that adventure outdoors and feral cats, kill between 1.4 billion and 3.7 billion birds in a year, says Peter Marra of the Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute in Washington, D.C., who led the team that performed the analysis. Previous estimates of bird kills have varied, he says, but “500 million is a number that has been thrown around a lot.”
For wild mammals, the annual toll lies between 6.9 billion and 20.7 billion, Marra and his colleagues report along with the bird numbers January 29 in Nature Communications. The majority of these doomed mammals and birds fall into the jaws of cats that live outdoors full-time with or without food supplements from people.
“The results are remarkable, not only for the big number, but also for the proportion of deaths from feral cats,” says Gary M. Langham, chief scientist for the National Audubon Society. The study assigns 952 million to 3.1 billion bird deaths a year to these wild cats. “These numbers really elevate this threat to a new level.”
To figure out how much wildlife cats catch, Marra and his colleagues combed the scientific literature for the best assessments of how many cats live in the United States and of what cats there and in similar climates hunt. Roughly 114 million cats live in the contiguous United States, 84 million of which share people’s houses. Forty to 70 percent of those household cats do at least some roaming outside. Between half and 80 percent of those outdoor cats hunt.
Marra says scientists have difficulty judging what proportion of total populations the cat catches represent. Comprehensive mammal numbers are a deep mystery, and estimates for U.S. land birds from volunteer counts lie between 10 billion and 20 billion adults.
“Cats are a nonnative species,” he notes, and multiple studies have shown that their hunting often targets natives. In his own research, Marra has shown that hunting cats can transform places that would normally be sources of young birds into sinks that drain birds from neighboring populations.
University of Wisconsin–Madison conservation biologist Stanley Temple says “this huge problem awaits a practical and widely acceptable solution.” The practice of catching free-roaming cats to neuter in hopes of shrinking populations is “simply too difficult, time consuming and expensive,” says Temple, a senior fellow at the Aldo Leopold Foundation. “Even if Herculean efforts made it feasible at very small local scales, from a conservation perspective, [the trapping and neutering approach] maintains free-ranging cat populations that will continue to harm native wildlife.”
An alternative policy of repeatedly rounding up cats and killing them hasn’t worked, says Becky Robinson, president of Alley Cat Allies, based in Bethesda, Md., a national advocacy group for protecting cats and reforming animal control.
“The big message is responsible pet ownership,” Marra says. Even though full-time outdoor cats may be the bigger problem, he says, cats with indoor homes still catch some 1.9 billion wild animals a year.
Cat hunting catches have not gotten the serious conservation attention they deserve, he says, because policy makers often dismiss cats as a minor threat compared with the other mortal dangers that wildlife faces. However, the new estimates outstrip assessments of annual bird deaths from pesticide poisonings or from collisions with windows, communication towers or vehicles.
Marra says he hopes to provide science to encourage dialog, instead of bitter fights, between wildlife conservationists and advocates for cat welfare. “The irony here is that you’ve got people who love animals on both sides,” he says.
Citations
S.R. Loss, T. Will and P.P. Marra. The impact of free-ranging domestic cats on wildlife in the United States. Nature Communications. doi: 10.1038/ncomms2380 [Go to]
Suggested Reading
S. Barazesh. U.S. bird populations in decline, report says. Science News Online. [Go to]
S.R. Loss, T. Will and P.P. Marra. Direct human-caused mortality of birds: improving quantification of magnitude and assessment of population impact. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment. Vol. 10, September 2012, p. 357. doi: 10.1890/110251. [Go to]
N.N. Peterson et al. Opinions from the front lines of cat colony management conflict. PLOS ONE. Posted September 6, 2012. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0044616. [Go to]
Please alert Science News to any inappropriate posts by clicking the REPORT SPAM link within the post. Comments will be reviewed before posting.
Now that he's gone, my garden is overrun with bunnies and rodents, I'll need to put up a fence.
The new cats are indoors due to birds: a big red-tail hawk and a northern harrier.
DDddd
(1) Those who are trapping outdoor cats in great numbers are implementing humane control and will not support killing.
(2) Government-run shelters do not have the resources to trap millions of cats—nor can they even realistically accept them all for euthanasia.
(3) Building “sanctuaries” for millions of feral cats is an enormous task, even if possible. Plus expensive. Who will pay for them to be built and who will run them?
(4) And finally, removing all outdoor cats—a mesopredator and a highly specialized rodent hunter—would be an unimaginable disaster for the American environment.
Why I call this “A Dangerous Game”:
One has only to look at the history of eradicating cats from small islands to see (1) it took many years (19 years in one case) (2) they had to use several methods of control including poisons, (3) after removing the cats the rodents and rabbits took over and destroyed the environment, putting at risk the very animals they were trying to “save” .
The anti-cat folks leave out this information when they suggest “getting rid of all cats.” The methods used to eliminate cats on islands are ones that will be quite unacceptable to the humane society in the United States. Terrestrial ecologist Dr Dana Bergstrom said of Macquarie Island that the program, while well-intentioned, resulted in widespread ecosystem devastation when cats were eradicated and rabbit numbers exploded.
At Alley Cat Rescue (ACR) this has always been our point. Using eradication programs is short-sighted and a quick-fix. It is NOT a long-term solution. A better way to control them is achieved through sterilizing the cats, stopping the breeding, and allowing for a slow attrition through natural causes, and allowing the prey animals to adjust.
My wife and I have two cats. They are both neutered and both kept indoors at all times, a fact that irritates one of our cats to no end; however, there are several outdoor-roaming house cats, and a few feral cats in the neighborhood. I don't know how many birds or other rodents the outdoor cats kill. I do observe that there are enough birds and squirrels in the area (despite the supposedly hunting cats) that about half of my tomatoes were damaged or destroyed by birds and squirrels last growing season, even with protective steps (such as bird netting over my plants) that I took.
There is a reason that humans have long domesticated cats: vermin control, both mammal and bird. If you want your cat to kill rodents and not birds, keep the cat in during the day and put it out at night.
But I do not see any shortage of birds in the city, where cats are concentrated. City lights give birds more food and more time to eat it (see "City lights create sexually early birds" and the comments), and they reproduce well, while being kept on their toes by cats.
But feeding outdoor colonies of cats while calling them feral, as Alley Cat Allies does, is unnecessary and causes more predation than necessary. Feral cats are not fed, and thus defend their hunting territories from other cats. Fed cats are pets, hunt for fun, tolerate each other like dependent kittens, and can over-hunt their range.
I keep several cats in my yard. My blueberries are safe, and the single cat who gets to sleep indoors during the day has been catching exotic pet-store feral rats that have overrun our neighborhood.
There are too many variables involved for anyone to accurately extrapolate data from the "scientific literature" on cat predation, to estimate the number of birds killed by cats, annually.
As a biologist who loves birds as well as cats, I am disgusted to keep finding this study covered in all my sources of information. It does not make me want to calmly discuss this matter. It makes me want to scream, "No way!"
For me, any article that condemns cat predation on birds comes across as cat-hating, unless several sentences are devoted to the greater causes for the demise of avian populations in North America, namely loss of habitat and collision with manmade structures.
Data from small studies are impossible to extrapolate because not all species of birds are susceptible to cat predation, and not all cats prey or subsist on birds. These numbers vary too much by location and circumstance.
Now, if I was participating in a "scientific study" I would report that I have one cat, that I allow outside. Is she under constant supervision? No. But, I make sure she stays on the balcony, that there are either no birds around, or nothing to attract the birds to the balcony or the weather is really crappy. She's not allowed outside, unsupervised, when there are fledgings around, or if there are wrens or hummingbirds in the area. For the last 10 years, the mortality count is 0 for cat predation and at least 15 sparrow, hummingbird, thrush, and siskin bodies that I've found from window collisions. Not good.
You must register with Science News to add a comment. To log-in click here. To register as a new user, follow this link.