Quantcast
issue
Read articles, including Science News stories written for ages 9-14, on the SNK website.
Some chores linked to less sex
Husbands who do more household work make love less, new study suggests
A+ A- Text Size

Husbands who do more household work make love less, new study suggests

By Nathan Seppa

Web edition: January 30, 2013

Maybe it’s the apron. Couples in the United States in which the men do more chores around the house have less sex than those in which the husbands don’t do the dishes and laundry as much, a new study finds. The findings appear in the February American Sociological Review.

The division of labor in the typical U.S. household became more egalitarian between 1965 and 1995 says study coauthor Sabino Kornrich, a sociologist at the Juan March Institute in Madrid. As women entered the workforce in droves and had smaller families, men took on more chores.

But the new study, a snapshot of more than 3,500 heterosexual married couples in the United States in the early 1990s, finds that wives were still doing four-fifths of the household chores traditionally associated with women: doing dishes, washing clothes, cooking, cleaning and shopping. The husbands did a bare majority of traditionally male jobs, which comprised yard work, auto maintenance, driving and paying bills, Kornrich says. 

Against this backdrop, the new analysis finds that men reported having sex 5.2 times per month on average; women said their average was 5.6 times. Couples in which the man did a greater-than-average share of traditionally women’s chores reported less sex than couples in which men carried a below-average load. Couples in which the husband did all the “women’s work” had one-third less sex than those in which the man did none of it.

Couples in which the husband did plenty of traditionally male jobs reported more sex than those in which the guy didn’t. When the husband did all of it, those couples had 18 percent more sex than couples in which the man did none, Kornrich says. The participants, who filled out written questionnaires, ranged in age from 18 to 65, with an average in the 40s.

“Housework remains a particularly important place where people express their gender identities,” Kornrich says. While those identities may seem traditional or even out of date in light of career changes and shared duties in the home, he says, “it’s not like they have disappeared.”

While he expresses puzzlement that couples would have more sex in relationships when men seem to be shirking some of their home duties, he notes that the finding held up even when he and his colleagues accounted for marital satisfaction. Besides, Kornrich says, beliefs about sex are loaded with double standards, and this study just adds delegation of housework to that mix. “I suspect that sex may change more slowly than other areas [of behavior] because we don’t want to talk about it and don’t want to address it.”

Some scientists remain unconvinced that less work around the home by the man is a turn-on for a couple. “The jury is out on this,” says Oriel Sullivan, a sociologist at the University of Oxford in England, citing research that draws different conclusions.

Constance Gager, a sociologist at Montclair State University in New Jersey, has found that couples in which both spouses contribute a lot to household work tend to have more sex than couples who do less around the house. She refers to it as “work hard, play hard.”

Sullivan acknowledges the possibility that the underlying sensibilities guiding sexual desire and frequency in a marriage have not changed in step with the division of household labor. After all, popular culture still often represents men in highly traditional roles, she says. “The movie image of masculinity, the action hero, has hardly shifted at all over the last 50 years.”

As for sex, frequency may not explain it all, anyway. Gager says that social workers tell her that patients insist that quality matters just as much as quantity.
Comment
Print Friendly and PDF

S. Kornrich, J. Brines and K. Leupp. Egalitarianism, housework, and sexual frequency in
Marriage. American Sociological Review. Vol. 78, February, 2013, p. 26.


S. Bianchi et al. Is anyone doing the housework? Trends in the gender division of household labor. Social Forces. Volume 79, 2000, p. 191. [Go to]

N. Chethik. VoiceMale: What husbands really think about their marriages, their wives, sex, housework, and commitment. 2006. New York: Simon and Schuster.

C. Gager and S.T. Yabiku. Who has the time? The relationship between household labor time and sexual frequency. Journal of Family Issues. Volume 31, 2010, p. 135.
[Go to]

S. Gupta. Autonomy, dependence, or display? The relationship between married women’s earnings and housework. Journal of Marriage and Family. Volume 69, 2007, p. 399. [Go to]

Comments (8)

Please alert Science News to any inappropriate posts by clicking the REPORT SPAM link within the post. Comments will be reviewed before posting.

  • ..."While he ( notice it says "HE"!) expresses puzzlement that couples would have more sex in relationships when men seem to be shirking some of their home duties, he notes that the finding held up even when he and his colleagues accounted for marital satisfaction."... ALSO..."Some scientists remain unconvinced that less work around the home by the man is a turn-on for a couple."...Well, less work is NOT a turn-on, rather, more work is a "turn-off". The answer is that when the "man" does housework, he experiences how tough it really is, he becomes mentally & physically tired and thus less 'frisky'. This is NOT a new concept to "housewives"!!!
    Doug Reed Doug Reed
    Jan. 30, 2013 at 7:17pm
  • It seems reasonable to me to assume that the percentage of household chores men are completing is not arbitrary, but would perhaps correlate to external factors such as picking up the slack is a partner has a career, is actively minding grandchildren, engages in exercise in the evenings or is studying for example. I would assume all of these potential contributing factors are likely to contribute to fatigue, stress, quality time shared and mood - ergo sexual libido. In this case the result of the study would not be surprising. Eg. A challenging professional career which requires the greater division of chores at home, may also result in more stress and less leisure time - and less sex as a consequence. This article has a real causation issue to my mind.
    Heath Comeadow Heath Comeadow
    Jan. 31, 2013 at 2:18pm
  • This is correlation without causality.
    Ralph Dratman Ralph Dratman
    Jan. 31, 2013 at 3:14pm
  • There could be many contributing factors, such as those described by Doug & Heath.

    Another is that a more "compliant" wife might also be inclined to do more "women's work".

    And yet another is that some of these men may be helping with such chores because they're "in the doghouse."

    Or some men may help out and refrain from initiating sex out of a combination of respect and an impression that women don't enjoy sex as much as men.
    Johnay Johnay
    Feb. 1, 2013 at 10:31am
  • The researchers missed one factor, namely, the level of the male hormone of the participants. Those men who chose to do more housework may relatively have less of the hormone, and therefore have less sexual desire.
    i4hope i4hope
    Feb. 1, 2013 at 12:26pm
  • This study is either painfully preliminary or the write-up leaves out critical factors. Heath addressed it, albeit more politely. Seems the key control is whether the woman also works outside the home, which is not addressed as a factor in the findings. Duh.

    If the woman does NOT work outside the home, she has more time to devote to the more time-consuming daily household maintenance chores, i.e., the traditionally female chores. If she does work outside the home, thereby necessitating the husband contribute by doing more of those chores, then by default, they both have less "leisure" time for that other marital activity. Please go back to Start.
    Monica Metzler Monica Metzler
    Feb. 4, 2013 at 7:33am
  • I really would like to know the men's hormone levels, but that was overlooked.

    Testosterone: Use it or lose it. Kind of like those blind fish found in caves. They don't need their eyes, so they lose their sight.

    I think about how men are being more and more feminized every time I hear a guy say, "My wife and I are pregnant." I want to scream, "No, your wife is pregnant; you are expecting a child."

    Use it or lose it guys. I suspect we don't know near as much about evolution as we think we do.
    J.R. Griffith J.R. Griffith
    Feb. 4, 2013 at 7:35am
  • None of the previous commentors mentioned the age of the statistics, "early 1990's" was a way different time than now--20 years later. The concept of doing household chores was a newer idea then, and many men had living fathers who would never....
    For loving couples I'd think making love has most to do with time and opportunity, as Monica says above. I am very curious to know what kind of frequencies occur among those who think and talk about it as having sex. The stats need a refresher.
    LindaJ LindaJ
    Feb. 4, 2013 at 1:13pm
Registered readers are invited to post a comment. To encourage fruitful discussion, please keep your comments relevant, brief and courteous. Offensive, irrelevant, nonsensical and commercial posts will not be published. (All links will be removed from comments.)

You must register with Science News to add a comment. To log-in click here. To register as a new user, follow this link.

Follow Us