Web edition: January 31, 2013
Print edition: March 9, 2013; Vol.183 #5 (p. 16)
The precise measurement of an exotic atom in the laboratory has refined scientists’ understanding of neutron stars, which are among the universe’s most extreme objects. The study, published January 22 in Physical Review Letters, could help scientists determine whether the crusts of neutron stars serve as the source of dozens of heavy elements such as zinc, silver and gold.
“One of the universe’s overriding mysteries is where heavy elements originate,” says James Lattimer, an astrophysicist at Stony Brook University in New York who was not involved in the study. “These mass measurements allow us to tune our equations so we can work toward settling the debate.”
Neutron stars are not actually stars at all. After a massive star explodes in a supernova, the remnant is a hot, dense ball about 20 kilometers across. It is made up of protons, electrons and lots of neutrons. That sphere packs in a mass larger than that of the sun, with a surface that one study estimates is 10 billion times as strong as steel. Under these extreme conditions, nuclei of atoms that are normally unstable can subsist in the neutron star’s outer layers.
Neutron stars are too far away to study their composition, and scientists cannot re-create the enormous pressures in the lab. But they can plug the measured properties of various neutron-rich atoms into computer simulations that predict neutron star composition. Physicist Robert Wolf of the University of Greifswald in Germany and an international team were particularly interested in determining the mass of zinc-82, which some models predict should occur in the crust of neutron stars. Zinc-82 has a nucleus consisting of 30 protons and 52 neutrons — many more than the 34 neutrons in the most common form of zinc. The challenge was isolating and measuring the rare isotope, most of which would decay in less than a second.
At CERN in Switzerland, Wolf’s team used the On-Line Isotope Mass Separator facility, which consists of a high-energy proton beam that strikes a thick block of uranium carbide. The protons shatter the nuclei in the target, creating a plethora of exotic isotopes that quickly decay into more-stable atoms. The researchers then exposed the atoms to electric and magnetic fields that separated them by mass. Within several tenths of a second, they measured the mass of a pure sample of zinc-82.
The researchers compared this mass with predictions in various computer models and determined that zinc-82 is probably absent from neutron stars. That’s in line with the most well-supported prediction of neutron star composition. Lattimer believes this aspect of the study is not its greatest contribution; previous experiments had already shown that the leading model was more accurate than others. Instead, he is most impressed by the technique’s potential to pin down the characteristics of other exotic nuclei that may exist in neutron stars.
Scientists want to create this compositional profile because neutron stars may be the source of many of the universe’s heavy elements. Fusion reactions in the cores of regular stars produce carbon, oxygen, nitrogen and other elements essential for life. But the heaviest element that fusion can construct is iron. Astrophysicists have long looked for another astronomical process with enough energy to forge heavier elements from protons and neutrons.
One explanation is that these elements form in the midst of the extreme heat and energy of supernovas — no neutron stars required. But simulations show that these explosions have an insufficient quantity of neutrons. That need for neutrons leads to a competing idea: that heavy elements form when two neutron stars collide and some of their crustal material escapes into space.
To evaluate this possibility, theorists need to improve the models of neutron star composition. Mass measurements of heavy atoms like zinc-82, Wolf says, will help them do that. Then astronomers can survey the abundances of heavy elements in various stars and compare them to predictions of what would be produced in neutron star collisions.Citations
R. N. Wolf et al. Plumbing neutron stars to new depths with the binding energy of the exotic nuclide 82-Zn. Physical Review Letters. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.041101. [Go to]
Suggested Reading
M. Cevallos. Neutron star breaks mass record. Science News Online. October 27, 2010. [Go to]
D. Powell. Supernova to superfluid. Science News Oline. February 4, 2011. [Go to]
Please alert Science News to any inappropriate posts by clicking the REPORT SPAM link within the post. Comments will be reviewed before posting.
This has indeed a very simple and logical answer in our fractal universe of observation:
. The neutron star would be a good source for heavy elements; but the heaviest in our universe would yet require the extreme pressure and density of of what I have called the COSMIC CORE.
Cosmic Cores are recycling centers - extremely dense centers constituting virtually all of the matter and energy of the entire universe - that dot our steady-state universe like atomic nuclei do in a block of matter. Further, the atomic nucleus, as well as individual nucleons, may be compared to the egg, having a hard outer shell, enclosing a relatively very soft inner fluid (for more, kindly see my homepage and click on, 'The Cosmos' and 'Mass Energy' using Internet Explorer).
The periodic stellar-nova-like upheavals of the Cores blow out the outer layers, thereby disseminating the heaviest atoms of them all throughout the universe.
Thank you all for your time and to Science for the space here. Cheers!
You must register with Science News to add a comment. To log-in click here. To register as a new user, follow this link.