Quantcast
issue
Read articles, including Science News stories written for ages 9-14, on the SNK website.
Life found deep below Antarctic ice
U.S. team drills through half-mile-thick sheet of ice to turn up cells
A+ A- Text Size

U.S. team drills through half-mile-thick sheet of ice to turn up cells

By Janet Raloff

Web edition: February 1, 2013
Print edition: March 9, 2013; Vol.183 #5 (p. 12)

Enlarge
SNOW DAY
A U.S. research team has drilled 800 meters into the ice sheet that covers Lake Whillans in Antarctica (the team’s camp pictured here in 2011) and retrieved the first signs of life from a subglacial lake.
WISSARD/NSF

Cells containing DNA have emerged as the first evidence of life in a subglacial lake in West Antarctica. On January 28, a U.S. research team retrieved water from Lake Whillans, which sits 800 meters below the ice surface. The water hosted a surprising bounty of living cells.

The scientists collected three 10-liter water samples from the lake. Preliminary tests conducted in mobile labs show that the cells are actively using oxygen. It may take months for biologists to identify the microbes present.

The microbes have been sealed off below the ice for at least 100,000 years.

A challenge was ruling out contamination as a source of the cells, says microbiologist Brent Christner of Louisiana State University in Baton Rouge, reached by satellite phone at a tent encampment at the drill site. Even glacial ice harbors low concentrations of microbes, “or their corpses,” so the researchers were concerned that cells in the lake samples could actually have come from the ice, Christner says.  

Enlarge
WHAT LIES BENEATH
Under hundreds of meters of ice lies Antarctica’s network of lakes and rivers. Three research teams have attempted to sample the subglacial lakes Ellsworth, Whillans and Vostok.
WISSARD/NSF

He argues that the cells come from the lake. First, cell concentrations in water retrieved from the lake were on the order of 10,000 per milliliter, which is about 100 times higher than the cell count in meltwater from the drill hole. Second, that meltwater is roughly comparable chemically to distilled water. In contrast, mineral levels in the water from which Christner’s team isolated its cells are 100 times higher — equivalent to what’s present in the lake’s water. 

“This is a big deal — and exciting,” says glaciologist Martin Siegert of the University of Bristol in England. The U.S. team’s drilling endeavor marks “the first clean access to a subglacial lake system.” Acquiring clean samples is imperative, he adds, to inspire confidence that any microbial finds truly come from the buried lakes.

Lake Whillans sits in a shallow cavity at the downstream end of a slow-moving sheet of ice. The deep liquid streams that feed this and more than 340 other subglacial lakes across Antarctica also lubricate the ice above. Geothermal energy, along with friction and a heavy blanket of ice, keeps the water liquid in this frigid land.

Excitement at the prospect of exploring the lakes erupted in 1996, recalls Siegert. That’s when an international research team he was part of realized the massive extent of Lake Vostok (SN: 6/29/96, p. 407), a subglacial lake discovered decades earlier. At once, Siegert says, microbiologists began proposing that this buried lake — and possibly others — might host ecosystems that had been cut off from the surface for a very long time.

Precisely how long remains unknown, says Slawek Tulaczyk, a glaciologist from the University of California, Santa Cruz, and a team leader on the Antarctic drill program. At Lake Whillans, “a good guess for a minimum is about 100,000 years.” That’s the last time the ice sheet may have shrunk back enough to expose the roughly 10-square-mile lake, he explains.

The new drilling project uncovered a second surprise: The lake is surprisingly shallow. Two years ago, a team conducted seismic experiments by detonating explosives; researchers used the resulting sound waves to map what lies beneath the ice. These seismic data indicated Lake Whillans was about 30 feet deep, Tulaczyk says. But instruments his team sent down the borehole now peg the lake’s depth “at only about 5 to 6 feet.”

The most likely explanation, Tulaczyk says, rests on a third surprise that emerged from the drilled borehole: The lake sediment contains a substantial amount of water. That unexpected mixing, he says, confused the earlier seismic readings.

Last year, a Russian team pierced Lake Vostok but has to date found no evidence of life. Last month, technical difficulties convinced Siegert and his colleagues on a British team to suspend their efforts for the year to reach the subglacial Lake Ellsworth (SN: 1/26/13, p. 9).

By January 31, the new 30-centimeter borehole down to Lake Whillans was beginning to freeze shut. So Tulaczyk’s group began lowering instruments down the hole one last time. This package will freeze in place until the researchers can return.
Comment
Print Friendly and PDF

Whillans Ice Stream Subglacial Access Research Drilling Project homepage: [Go to]


D. Fox. Where rivers run uphill. Science News for Kids. July 25, 2008. [Go to]

R. Monastersky. Giant lake hides beneath Antarctica's ice. Science News. Vol. 149. June 29, 1996, p. 407.

J. Raloff. U.S. team breaks through subglacial lake. Science News Online, January 28, 2013. [Go to]

J. Raloff. Antarctic test of novel ice drill poised to begin. Science News Online, December 15, 2012. [Go to]

A. Witze. Antarctic subglacial drilling effort suspended. Science News, January 26, 2013, p. 9. Available online: [Go to]

Comments (4)

Please alert Science News to any inappropriate posts by clicking the REPORT SPAM link within the post. Comments will be reviewed before posting.

  • What kind of proof do we have that no contamination of bacteria can occur from water systems slowly feeding the lake from above? Does actually melt water flow down to the lake at any reasonable rate? And if so, can we estimate the rate of bacteria brought down with it? Thanks.
    Dario Menasce Dario Menasce
    Feb. 4, 2013 at 7:33am
  • In enjoyed the article, but have a terminology quibble. In the third from last paragraph is the sentence “The lake sediment contains a substantial amount of water. That unexpected mixing …” A better description would be “The lake sediment has a surprisingly high porosity (low density), and thus lower than expected seismic velocity, which confused the earlier seismic interpretation.”

    Being at the bottom of a lake, the sediment would be fully saturated. All pore space between the solid materials would be full of water. Thus, to contain “a substantial amount of water”, the sediment must have the high porosity, low density, and low elastic modulus that affects the compressive wave velocity. Assuming the wrong velocity would lead to the error you describe. Referring to the sediment porosity, density, “stiffness”, or “soft” consistency would more clearly explain to the readers the condition of the sediment. I am not a specialist in geophysics so the exact terminology might be verified with your sources.

    The original sentence implies the reverse of the likely depositional history. It is very unlikely that water somehow mixed into the sediment. The most likely scenario is for sediment constituents to be transported into the area as suspended load in a water flow, then settle through the water to form a deposit of solid materials in grain to grain contact. The portion of the bulk volume of sediment that is not solid material is called the porosity and would be filled with water (though less that the amount of water in which it was the suspended load). As sediment accumulates, the buried sediment progressively shifts along its grain-to-grain contacts to a denser configuration as required to support the increasing weight of overlying materials. This denser configuration of solid grains requires the excess pore water to be expelled because the total pore volume is decreasing. The water content in deeper layers progressively decreases as the sediment accumulates.

    I speculate that the researchers’ surprise at the lower-than-expected sediment density implies that the sediment was less consolidated than would be expected from the weight of solids accumulation under normal conditions. That would suggest either inter-grain cementation or inter-grain electrostatic repulsion was allowing the sediment deposit to support this weight better than would be expected from purely frictional forces between grains.
    Tony Cooley Tony Cooley
    Feb. 4, 2013 at 7:34am
  • Can we speculate about the foothold life may have found elsewhere? Does this expand the range of niches life can fill?
    Valour Valour
    Feb. 4, 2013 at 9:00am
  • Water pockets can develop and disappear near the grounding zone, although they also arise upstream. They are fed by channels, and melt from the ice. You can tell from the radar. The seismic velocity expected would be roughly that of water. Some might suggest till, but in fact I have information that shows this work done on Whillans was incorrect. Till is less important than suggested. Although these organisms are subaerial, they might be flushed into the system from the Ross Ice Shelf by tidal action. Is it possible the samples are contaminated?
    Karl Marx Karl Marx
    Feb. 12, 2013 at 9:45am
Registered readers are invited to post a comment. To encourage fruitful discussion, please keep your comments relevant, brief and courteous. Offensive, irrelevant, nonsensical and commercial posts will not be published. (All links will be removed from comments.)

You must register with Science News to add a comment. To log-in click here. To register as a new user, follow this link.

Follow Us