Quantcast
issue
Read articles, including Science News stories written for ages 9-14, on the SNK website.
Ancient people and Neandertals were extreme travelers
Stone Age groups' leg bones, spears reflect remarkably long treks
A+ A- Text Size

Stone Age groups' leg bones, spears reflect remarkably long treks

By Bruce Bower

Web edition: March 8, 2013
Print edition: April 20, 2013; Vol.183 #8 (p. 9)

Enlarge
DISTANT POINTS
Chemical signatures of stone spear points from a southern African site (shown) indicate that people there regularly obtained tool-making rock from more than 220 kilometers away.
Sheila Coulson, U. of Oslo

The Stone Age could just as easily be called the Roam Age.

Two new studies published February 27 in the Journal of Human Evolution advance the idea that ancient people and Neandertals walked or ran far greater distances than any human groups that followed, including more recent hunter-gatherers and today’s long-distance runners. Fossils of humans and their beetle-browed evolutionary cousins display signs of extremely extended travel that occurred between roughly 120,000 and 10,000 years ago, Colin Shaw and Jay Stock, biological anthropologists at the University of Cambridge in England report in one of the studies.

Shaw and Stock conclude that the Stone Age crowd moved around considerably more than southern Africans from a few thousand years ago who hunted over an area of 5,200 to 7,800 square kilometers. Highly trained athletes today who run 130 to 160 kilometers every week come in third in this mobility comparison.

Human ancestors started wandering long distances around 1.7 million years ago (SN: 8/25/12, p. 22). The extent to which particular Stone Age species and groups roamed the landscape has been difficult to establish.

Shaw and Stock’s findings support an argument for extreme mobility among ancient people and Neandertals that has been championed over the last 15 years by Erik Trinkaus of Washington University in St. Louis and Christopher Ruff of Johns Hopkins University. Clues come from exceptionally robust leg bones, a dearth of older individuals in fossil samples suggesting that life spans were limited due to the rigors of constant travel, and an absence of skeletal injuries in excavated fossils that would have prevented vigorous movement, Trinkaus says.

Shaw and Stock used a calculation of the lower leg’s ability to withstand twisting and other forces to compare Stone Age hominids’ leg strength with that of human groups with known activity levels: varsity distance runners, varsity swimmers, non-athletic college students, Andaman Island foragers from the 1800s who swam constantly in pursuit of food, and southern African hunter-gatherers who hunted over a vast territory between 11,000 and 2,000 years ago.

Ancient human and Neandertal legs substantially overpowered those of the hunter-gatherers, who had stronger legs than the other groups. Regular swimmers brought up the rear, perhaps partly because swimming emphasizes upper- over lower-body strength, the researchers suggest.

Anthropologists don’t know what kept ancient people and Neandertals in constant motion. It could have been the hunt for spear-worthy rock, the second new study suggests. Chemical analyses of stone spear points from one southern African site indicate that silcrete spear points from 54,000 to 94,000 years ago chemically matched silcrete outcrops located more than 220 kilometers away, but not others situated only 70 kilometers away,

Rock reconnaissance missions began near the northwestern shore of an inland delta in what’s now Botswana, propose physical geographer David Nash of the University of Brighton in England and his colleagues. Journeyers headed to several rock sources just beyond the delta’s southernmost reaches.

Travel of that extent must have involved collecting both rock for spear points and game and fish possibly not available in the northern delta, Nash suggests. Or middleman groups could have collected blocks of stone and transported them partway north for trade. “We cannot say for certain what happened,” Nash says.
Comment
Print Friendly and PDF

D. Nash et al. Provenancing of silcrete raw materials indicates long-distance transport to Tsodilo Hills, Botswana, during the Middle Stone Age. Journal of Human Evolution. doi:10.1016/j.jhevol.2013.01.010. [Go to]

C. Shaw and J. Stock. Extreme mobility in the Late Pleistocene? Comparing limb biomechanics among fossil Homo, varsity athletes and Holocene foragers. Journal of Human Evolution. doi:10.1016/j.jhevol.2013.01.004. [Go to]


B. Bower. Tangled Roots. Science News. Vol. 182, Aug. 25, 2012, p. 22. Available online: [Go to]

Comments (6)

Please alert Science News to any inappropriate posts by clicking the REPORT SPAM link within the post. Comments will be reviewed before posting.

  • While the search for spear-worthy rock may be a consideration, I wonder if the search for food is at the constant travel?
    If climate had changed the chemistry of water in streams and lakes making it too acidic for fish, then the long treks would be necessary. Since not only Neanders, but other top predators would have trouble finding food, Neanders who could exist on roots, berries, etc would have more luck finding edible goods. And the scarcity of top predators would allow more safe travel.
    A major note regarding Neanders and the 100,000 age span in which they dominated is that they did not create. The Cro Magnons are often praised for innovation like spear points, boomerangs (developed in German) other achievements, Neanders are claimed to be low intelligence because they did not innovate. I suggest that survival in a crisis environment of that would have seen a mouse or two the day's food supply is a challenge the Cro Magnons would not have survived.
    kathleen sisco kathleen sisco
    Mar. 10, 2013 at 7:40pm
  • Constant migration may have been from following herds. Caribou can travel over a thousand miles yearly, and Mammoths legs were nearly twice as long.
    xznofile xznofile
    Mar. 10, 2013 at 7:40pm
  • Might the long distance traveling have been caused by following migrating animal herds? Having visited Lascaux, we were told that the (modern human) inhabitants there ate a diet consisting largely of reindeer meat, so it's tempting to think that they followed the herd in the same way that the Lapps do. This would require a society in fairly constant motion.
    Ann Kah Ann Kah
    Mar. 10, 2013 at 7:40pm
  • I don't doubt that Neandertals and Homo sapiens from that time were both very strong. But I thought I read somewhere that the leg bones of early H. sapiens were oval or slightly tear-drop shaped in cross-section, which is known from current human examples to mean that they walked great distances, whereas the leg bones of H. neanderthalensis were round in cross-section, strongly suggesting they DIDN'T walk such great distances. Can anyone confirm whether those remembered observations about bone shapes and the implications of those shapes are correct (and identify where I might have read that stuff)? And do the current studies address the issue of cross-sectional shape at all? I am not a physiologist, but I wonder whether very strong leg bones would necessarily imply a great deal of long-distance walking. Weight-lifters, for example, may have very strong bones without engaging in much walking.
    No-one doubts that Neandertals led very hard lives, suffered many injuries, and were very strong, but the summary article above does not seem entirely persuasive that their strength was necessarily due to cross-country travel as a way of life. The story notes that Erik Trinkaus, noted Neandertal guy, cites a couple of other findings in support of the current studies' conclusions ("a dearth of older individuals in fossil samples suggesting that life spans were limited due to the rigors of constant travel, and an absence of skeletal injuries in excavated fossils that would have prevented vigorous movement." But to me, hunting BIG game with hand-held weapons as a way of life seems as if it would have been rigorous enough to account for those findings. (The story has moved me to start re-reading Trinkaus and Shipman's 1992 book "The Neandertals." It is of course somewhat outdated, but I remember it as very interesting and well-argued (although its veracity was somewhat undercut by a reference to a "1,200-pound Bengal" tiger -- that's roughly twice as large as the largest Bengal tiger).
    tim cliffe tim cliffe
    Mar. 10, 2013 at 7:40pm
  • I glanced over the headlines and initially misread this one as "Neandertals were *time* travelers".

    But I guess it's about three weeks early for that. :)
    Johnay Johnay
    Mar. 11, 2013 at 11:57am
  • How many years would a good spearhead be expected to be used? It could have been handed down from generation to generation, until it broke off in an animal that got away. So 120 or 150 miles may not be very far for a stone to travel in that time. And organized trade may have occurred, but theft and violence also seem likely.
    S Gruhn S Gruhn
    Mar. 13, 2013 at 6:10am
Registered readers are invited to post a comment. To encourage fruitful discussion, please keep your comments relevant, brief and courteous. Offensive, irrelevant, nonsensical and commercial posts will not be published. (All links will be removed from comments.)

You must register with Science News to add a comment. To log-in click here. To register as a new user, follow this link.

Follow Us