Cosmic heavyweight
Most distant, massive galaxy cluster discovered to date holds dark energy clues
font_down font_up Text Size
access
BIG BLUEThis optical image, taken by the Large Binocular Telescope in Safford, Arizona, confirmed that the fuzzy blue dot is 2XMM J083026+524133 — the most massive, distant cluster of galaxies found to date. The blue represents the cluster’s X-ray emissions.Full StoryESA XMM-Newton, EPIC, LBT, LBC, AIP, J. Kohnert

A new cosmic crowd has captured the distance and heavyweight titles for galaxy clusters discovered deep in the universe. The record-breaker sits billions of light-years from Earth and weighs about a thousand times the mass of the Milky Way, astronomers report in an upcoming issue of Astronomy & Astrophysics.

“To discover a cluster that is so distant yet so big was quite lucky,” says study coauthor Georg Lamer of the Astrophysical Institute of Potsdam in Germany.

Lamer and his Potsdam colleagues first spotted the massive cluster, dubbed 2XMM J083026+524133, when scrutinizing data from the European Space Agency’s XMM-Newton space telescope. In 2001,the X-ray satellite captured the cluster’s signature while imaging a distant, active galaxy. Surveying the satellite’s catalogue earlier this year for nearby galaxies and distant clusters, the team was startled that the new cluster’s X-ray signal had been overlooked.

access
BRIGHT SPOTThis XMM-Newton image shows the X-ray signal of the most distant, massive cluster of galaxies, at far right. The telescope’s original target for this observation was an active galaxy — the bright spot in the upper left.ESA XMM-Newton, EPIC, G. Lamer

“It was so bright,” Lamer says.

Optical images from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey established that the light could not be coming from a nearby galaxy in that particular cosmic region. So the team took a deep field exposure with the Large Binocular Telescope at the Mt. Graham International Observatory near Safford, Ariz. The cluster appeared and was calculated to be 7.7 billion light-years from Earth. The previous record-holding cluster sits only 3.5 billion light-years away and weighs slightly less than a thousand Milky Ways.

“The new cluster, at its great distance and with its mass,” Lamer says, “can only be explained by the existence of dark energy.”

Dark energy is an unexplained force that accelerates the expansion of the universe. Without this force, Lamer says, nearby clusters should be much more massive than those that are billions of light-years away. Distant clusters, he says, should be less massive because they had less time to conglomerate.

“It is notoriously hard to compare cluster masses,” he notes. “But, the ‘neighboring’ Coma Cluster and this new, distant cluster actually seem to have comparable masses.”

Still, it is an overstatement to claim that dark energy exists based on observations of this one cluster, comments astrophysicist Stephen Murray of the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics in Cambridge, Mass. Although, he says, the discovery does add an important data point in the study of galaxy clusters, which help astronomers test cosmological models that include dark energy.

The strength of dark energy at various cosmic times can be determined if astronomers compare the number of massive clusters found at different distances, Lamer says. But far-off, massive clusters are rare, and XMM-Newton scans too little of the sky to find them. So astronomers must wait until 2011 for the launch of eROSITA, a German X-ray telescope, to scan the entire sky for the predicted 100 or so remaining deep-space, cluster heavyweights, he adds.


Found in: Atom & Cosmos
Comments 1
  • Galaxy Clusters Evolved By Dispersion, Not By Conglomeration

    I. From "Cosmic heavyweight"

    http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/36050/title/Cosmic_heavyweight

    "Astronomers discover the heftiest, most distant galaxy cluster, suggesting evidence for dark energy's existence."

    "Dark energy is an unexplained force that accelerates the expansion of the universe. Without this force, Lamer says, nearby clusters should be much more massive than those that are billions of light-years away. Distant clusters, he says, should be less massive because they had less time to conglomerate."


    II. Galaxy Clusters Evolved By Dispersion, Not By Accretion

    A. Compact Galaxies In Early Universe Pack A Big Punch

    http://www.physorg.com/news128692030.html


    Again, repeating an old posting of mine:

    "Singularity, max density, and D-Infinity, max expansion/ cosmic energy dilution, are the two cosmic stable states. Their in-between is a metastable state, which is an everyday commonsense observation. Likewise is the observation that the denser the compacting goal of material the more energy is required, and vice versa the more thorough the disintegration of material the higher the amount of energy released. It seems that E=mC^2 is a specific case of the cosmic (and universal) process
    E=Total[m(1 + D)] where D is the Distance from Big Bang point and the sum is of all spatial values of D from D=0 to D=selected value.

    BTW, following Newton (1) gravity is decreased when mass is decreased and (2) acceleration of a body is given by dividing the force acting upon it by its mass. By plain common sense, best scientific approach, the combination of those two 'laws' may explain the accelerating cosmic expansion of galaxy clusters, based on the above E/ m/ D suggested relationship. "

    Thus the young "condensed galaxies" are, in fact, what later evolved into galactic clusters.


    B. Galaxy Clusters Evolved By Dispersion, Not By Buildup

    http://www.physforum.com/index.php?showtopic=14988&st=210&#entry337638

    1. Genesis

    http://blog.360.yahoo.com/blog-P81pQcU1dLBbHgtjQjxG_Q--?cq=1&p=268

    Extrapolation of the expansion of the universe backwards in time to the early hot dense "Big Bang" phase, using general relativity, yields an infinite density and temperature at a finite time in the past.

    At age 10^-35 seconds the Universe begins with a cataclysm that generates space and time, as well as all the matter and energy the Universe will ever hold.


    2. How have galaxy clusters evolved

    1. http://herschel.jpl.nasa.gov/galaxies.shtml

    "Among the stranger objects that appear to have populated the early universe are active galactic nuclei (AGNs)."

    3. http://imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/features/topics/clusters_group/evolution.html

    "How did the Universe evolve after the Big Bang?" and "How did galaxies form?" These are big questions, and they are not easy to answer: after all, these things occurred billions of years ago. Galaxy clusters provide one window into the very early Universe. They are the largest gravitationally bound objects in the Universe, and the properties of clusters can be used to place strong limits on cosmological theories of structure formation and evolution.

    4. http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/03/080331122543.htm

    The process of galaxy formation largely is a mystery. Current theory is that large galaxies formed over time from the interaction and merging of smaller galaxies. This process began more than 12 billion years ago, shortly after the Big Bang. Scientists have observed galaxies merging over a large range of distances and time, providing hard evidence to reinforce the theory. However, using current technology, it is difficult to detect this process at the most extreme distances, when galaxy formation was in its infancy.

    Scientists believe galaxy clusters form in a similar manner. As galaxies congregate and interact in large, dense regions of space, the cluster grows with time. Witnessing this process first-hand helps scientists confirm their theory and deepen their understanding of the universe. Galaxy clusters can be detected at extreme distances with current technology because they are bright, but they are difficult to find.


    C. I suggest: Galaxy Clusters Evolved By Dispersion Of "Condensed Packs",

    not by accretion of smaller matter. The dispersion/breakdown of the "condensed packs"
    followed the relationship E=Total[m(1 + D)] , i.e. it was accompanied by an overall decrease of mass. Accretion possibly and probably took place, too, in this and in other cosmic evolutions within and between clusters, but the primal GC evolved as D, dispersion, increased accompanied by m decreased.


    Suggesting,

    Dov Henis

    http://blog.360.yahoo.com/blog-P81pQcU1dLBbHgtjQjxG_Q--?cq=1
    Dov Henis Dov Henis
    Sep. 7, 2008 at 4:19pm
Post a comment

Please login or register to participate.


Advertisement
Suggested Reading:
seperator
  • Cowen, R. 2006. Cosmic push: Finding pieces of a dark puzzle. Science News 169(Jan. 21):35. Available at [Go to].
  • ______. 2005. Cosmic expansion: Supernovas shed light on dark energy. Science News 168(Dec. 17):390. Available at [Go to].
Citations & References:
seperator
  • Lamer, G., et al. 2008. 2XMM J083026+524133: The most X-ray luminous cluster at redshift 1. Astronomy and Astrophysics 487:L33-L36. DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:200810255
Reader Favorites:
seperator
SN on the Web:
seperator