Quantcast
issue
Read articles, including Science News stories written for ages 9-14, on the SNK website.
Obama's brain trust
A+ A- Text Size

By Janet Raloff

Web edition: September 26, 2008

As I noted last week, advisers to the presidential candidates have been fairly mum about which scientists, medical leaders and engineers have signed on to advise and/or support Sens. John McCain and Barack Obama.

It’s something Albert H. Teich also noted when I contacted this director of Science & Policy Programs at the American Association for the Advancement of Science several weeks back. Observed Teich in August, “You don’t have any really identifiable science people associated with McCain’s campaign, whereas there are quite a few people on the Obama side.” Indeed, he said, “You could say that there is a brain trust of scientists” linked to the Democratic candidate.

Yesterday, Obama’s campaign released “an open letter to the American people” signed by 61 Nobel laureates. All received their award for achievements in physics (22), chemistry (14) or medicine (25).

In their letter, they argue that during the past eight years, “vital parts of our country’s scientific enterprise have been damaged by stagnant or declining federal support. The government’s scientific advisory process has been distorted by political considerations.”

Commenting on Obama’s stump rhetoric, the letters point “in particular” to measures that the Illinois senator said he plans to implement to meet national and global needs “through new initiatives in education and training, expanded research funding, an unbiased process for obtaining scientific advice, and an appropriate balance of basic and applied research.” Many of these points have been outlined on Obama’s website and in his written responses to Science Debate 2008 questions (all of which are also summarized in the latest issue of Science News and Science News online reports).

Alas, Obama’s plans for boosting the conduct of science and the development of a larger, better trained workforce may be compromised by current events. If, as seems likely, the public will be asked to shoulder a $700 billion-plus bailout of financial institutions in the coming year, Uncle Sam’s purse strings will be stretched taut. Just Wednesday, Obama acknowledged that such a bailout would slow the pace at which he — should he reach the White House — would be able to phase in his proposed changes.

When McCain's campaign releases the names of his science and engineering advisers and supporters, we'll post those here as well.

In the mean time, let’s just hope that the new president, whoever it turns it to be, doesn’t neglect science as he deals with Wall Street’s economic struggles. Because science is one of the best long-term investments any nation can make. And it pays off in good times and bad.

Comment
Print Friendly and PDF

Comments (9)

Please alert Science News to any inappropriate posts by clicking the REPORT SPAM link within the post. Comments will be reviewed before posting.

  • While the support of the President is important, it is not the determining factor, as the Bush Presidency shows. In spite of generous proposals for the expansion of scientific support in each of his budgets Congress has consistently refused to appropriate the funds necessary to carry out the expansion. This has been particularly evident during this Congress, when the purse-strings have been held by the Democrats.

    This should be a no-win situation for the Dems: if Obama gets elected and their earlier refusals have been based on logic and principle, Obama's proposals won't get funded either. On the other hand, if they are funded, it will show that the Congressional Democratic leadership is willing to do serious and permanent damage to the American scientific enterprise just so that George Bush can't claim any credit for it. I don't care to hope that Congress lacks principle just so that science gets funded reasonably.

    McCain, if elected, will almost certainly face a Democratically-controlled Congress, but at least he has a track record of being able to reach across the aisle to develop support for his ideas. Maybe it won't be too bad.
    Warren Funk Warren Funk
    Sep. 26, 2008 at 12:48pm
  • Mr. Funk,

    Are you counting DOD funding in your calculation of President Bush's "generous" science budgets? As far as biomedical research is concerned, President Bush has been the first president in over 30 years to propose a year-over-year flat NIH budget (twice). While he allowed the Clinton 5-year funding program for the NIH to run its course (ended 2003), he has greatly squandered much of what was underway since then. Like most areas of science and technology, consistent support is crucial for progress in this area. Together with this administration’s documented habit of marginalizing inconvenient data and analysis, it is quite understandable why many scientists and science policy professionals hold him and anyone who plans to continue his policies in low regard.
    Gene Webb Gene Webb
    Sep. 26, 2008 at 2:48pm
  • What fraction of available Nobel laureates does 61 represent? Certainly, it's way less than half. How about a little analysis along with reporting one-sided propaganda.
    John Anhalt John Anhalt
    Sep. 26, 2008 at 3:34pm
  • Reporting raw unmanipulated data, e.g. 61 Nobel Laureates so far for Sen Obama compared to 0 so far for Sen McCain, is very much the opposite of propaganda.

    The percent is irrelevant. If this was not the case, the US would never have a president (hint: what fraction of the total US population votes in presidential elections?)
    Gene Webb Gene Webb
    Sep. 26, 2008 at 4:16pm
  • Considering the Nobel committee in my opinion lowered their standards by awarding a prize to Al Gore for a politically correct stance as opposed to a scientifically correct one I put very little stock in the support of 61 of the same for Obama.
    Steve Crum Steve Crum
    Sep. 28, 2008 at 9:15pm
  • You seem a little confused, Mr. Crum. None of the five Norwegian politicians who make up the Nobel committee for the Peace Prize (which Al Gore won in part) are Nobel laureates, nor are any of them scientists. And I can't see why you would imply that Nobel laureates in the sciences are not good scientists, since they were apparently successful enough to receive the highest award in their field from a panel of their peers.

    Also, if you really mean to say, as I read it, that the anthropogenic global warming hypothesis is "scientifically incorrect", then I would like to know your sources. That is a surprisingly strong claim, especially since the majority of scientists and all of the scientific academies of major industrialized nations support that hypothesis.
    Jesse Ziser Jesse Ziser
    Oct. 4, 2008 at 7:36pm
  • McCain or Oboma at this time doesen't matter. With the 700B bailout costing 856B, if there ever is a time when the congress should cut all budgets it's now. All of us at times must do without what we have considered basics. Academics always want more money no matter how much you give them. The outcome of every study sponsered by the government is that a further study is needed.

    Michael MacKinney
    Michael MacKinney Michael MacKinney
    Oct. 9, 2008 at 3:23pm
  • What has Obama or McCain to do with science, they have only one objective to get power. Its the people who are developing science.
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]

    Tom Schavo Tom Schavo
    Nov. 17, 2009 at 9:33am

  • [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    m9bnat m9bnat2 m9bnat m9bnat2
    Jan. 14, 2010 at 10:37am
Registered readers are invited to post a comment. To encourage fruitful discussion, please keep your comments relevant, brief and courteous. Offensive, irrelevant, nonsensical and commercial posts will not be published. (All links will be removed from comments.)

You must register with Science News to add a comment. To log-in click here. To register as a new user, follow this link.

Follow Us