Galaxies on the move
Scientists detect a mysterious flow of galactic clusters
font_down font_up Text Size

A newly discovered “dark flow” appears to carry clusters of galaxies toward a point in the southern sky, a new study suggests.

As if dark matter and dark energy weren’t confusing enough, researchers detected what they have dubbed dark flow while surveying 700 galaxy clusters — each containing hundreds to thousands of galaxies — within a radius of approximately 1 billion light-years. On average, the clusters appeared to move in a uniform direction at about 1,000 kilometers per second.

While no one knows the cause of the motion, the scientists suggest that whatever it is may no longer lie within the visible universe. The work appears online in two separate papers, one to appear in the Oct. 20 Astrophysical Journal Letters and the other in an upcoming Astrophysical Journal.

“We expected to find something completely different,” says Alexander Kashlinsky, an astrophysicist at NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Md. "It’s basically a slope across the universe,” in a direction somewhere between the constellations of Centaurus and Vela.

The result flies in the face of one of cosmologists’ most cherished assumptions — backed by a vast wealth of data — that the universe is uniform. That is, its structure and the density of matter in it are about the same in all regions of the sky.

But the findings further complicate the picture of cosmology, comments cosmologist Glenn Starkman of Case Western Reserve University in Cleveland. The new results add to anomalies discovered in recent years in the cosmic microwave background, or CMB, the ubiquitous bath of cold radiation left over from the Big Bang. “It’s yet another piece of evidence that, on the largest scales, either we’re misunderstanding something or discovering something about the universe,” Starkman says.

Harald Ebeling, an astronomer at the University of Hawaii’s Institute for Astronomy in Honolulu and a coauthor of the studies, says he and his team checked and rechecked their results for more than a year before publishing them. “We didn’t believe it for the longest time,” he says.

The researchers’ work built upon a survey of the entire sky in the X-ray spectrum taken by the orbiting telescope ROSAT in the early 1990s. Galaxy clusters are usually suffused in a thin but very hot plasma, which emits X-rays. Back then, Ebeling and others used the ROSAT data to identify hundreds of large galaxy clusters by their X-ray halos, and matched that with optical-telescope data to estimate the clusters’ distance from Earth.

In the new study, the researchers estimated the motion of each cluster with respect to the CMB radiation, which is believed to be “the ultimate reference” of movement on a cosmological scale, says Ebeling.

As CMB radiation crosses a galaxy cluster, it gets scattered by electrons in the intergalactic plasma, Ebeling says. The scattering affects the radiation’s frequency. The frequency goes up if the cluster is moving toward Earth, and down if it’s moving away. This is called the kinetic Sunyaev-Zeldovich effect, analogous to the familiar Doppler shift of sound waves. The Doppler shift explains why the pitch of an ambulance’s siren sounds different depending on whether the ambulance is approaching or moving away from the listener.

The researchers looked for the kinetic Sunyaev-Zeldovich effect in CMB data released two years ago by NASA’s Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe mission. The effect was extremely small — comparable to a temperature change of millionths of a kelvin, Ebeling says.

For a single cluster, a variation this small easily drowns in the much larger experimental errors. Moreover, each cluster tends to move in its own direction, tugged by clusters nearby. But on average, the velocities showed a clear trend. “The velocity is not only high,” Kashlinsky says, “but it also remains the same velocity as far as you can see.”

“People will be inherently skeptical of any such results,” Starkman says, since they call into question the standard, homogeneous model of the universe. “Even those who have doubts about the model don’t have better alternatives.” But, he adds, researchers should still take the results seriously.

Kashlinsky says that random energy fluctuations in the earliest split second of the Big Bang — the epoch of stupendous expansion called inflation — could have created a large imbalance in the distribution of matter. While the denser regions of the universe would now be forever out of sight, the imbalance could have left its mark on the overall structure of spacetime. Like a dining room table tipped so that all the dinner plates slide off in the same direction, the imbalance may have put the local corner of the universe on a slope.

Such a large-scale imbalance is “absolutely possible,” says cosmologist Andrei Linde of Stanford University. But it would require some rather contrived tweaks to the still-tentative models of how inflation works. “Inflation typically makes the universe completely uniform,” Linde says. “People do not want to go in this direction without a really seriously demonstrated need.”

The results are something that people will “scratch their heads over,” says Ethan Vishniac of McMaster University in Hamilton in Canada. As the editor in chief of The Astrophysical Journal, Vishniac personally reviewed one of the papers. While the team’s methods were correct, he says, there are still large margins of error in the data, and only more research will help settle the matter of the lopsided universe.


Found in: Atom & Cosmos
Comments 4
  • Please forgive a possible triviality of this comment,
    but what about the explanation based on the relativity of motion?
    What if the observer moves with respect to the clusters in question
    with a speed vector equal minus the vector of the apparent
    collective motion of the clusters?
    To challenge this explanation, one has to estimate
    a possible magnitude of the observer velocity.
    The article mentions each cluster moving at its own velocity
    every which way. What is the average magnitude of those velocities
    from each of which the collective velocity and the
    "expanding-universe" velocity has to be subtracted
    geometrically before averaging? (Not the geometric average,
    which is, of course, 0, but average of magnitudes.)
    That number would be the most "typical" velocity
    of a galactic cluster and as such it would be an estimate
    of the observer velocity because the observer moves
    with a galactic cluster, the one our Milky Way belongs to.
    If the number happens to be of the same order,
    as the geometric average of the velocities which is discussed
    in the article and which has the magnitude about 1000 km/sec, then
    one should attribute the phenomenon to the relativity of motion.
    Maybe what I mentioned above is not discussed
    in the article because of this comment triviality.
    But then why all this talk about beginning of the universe
    etc.? If the galactic clusters typically move at such speeds
    and nobody is concerned about the reason for them to do so,
    why should be one for ours?

    Boris Lubachevsky Boris Lubachevsky
    Feb. 3, 2009 at 10:12pm
  • After reading both papers on this finding, I still find no reference ruling in or out possible effects of the "Great Attractor" located in the constellations Centaurus and Hydra at a distance close to this new "dark flow" anomaly( see the Wiki page for the "Great Attractor"). It is located behind the Milky Way in the so-called Zone of Avoidance. Alternatively, might a more distant, undiscovered supercluster exist even further out behind the GA? Until these questions are answered, I see no reason to invoke new astrophysics to explain their result. Already the Local Group and Virgo Cluster show kinematic movement towards the GA along with several other galaxy clusters. Maybe astronomers need to search for infalling galaxy clusters located on the far side of this apparent anomaly.
    Jon Hanford Jon Hanford
    Oct. 14, 2008 at 11:28am
  • Perhaps this is a signal of a "baby universe" inflating and being pinched off from our own universe, as hypothesized in Linde's own work with spontaneous inflation and multiverse theory. It also brings to mind a possible influence of the "Great Attractor" discovered behind the Milky Way in Centaurus some years ago. This also may seem to be a more plausible explanation of this "dark flow". But I agree with the last statement in the article that more research will be needed to confirm and explain this latest curveball thrown our way.
    Jon Hanford Jon Hanford
    Oct. 13, 2008 at 4:00pm
  • Since the Universe is considered "Flat" (Like the Earth once was!) perhaps there is an edge to fall off of and this causes an attraction which is accelerating these far away galaxy clusters toward that edge.

    Rog Dog
    Roger Galbraith Rog Dog
    Sep. 29, 2008 at 10:32pm
Post a comment

Please login or register to participate.


Advertisement
Suggested Reading:
seperator
  • Cowen, R. 2008. State of the Universe: Microwave glow powers cosmic insights. Science News 173 (March 15): 163. Available at [Go to]
  • Cowen, R. 2008. Before the beginning: Theory suggests a pre-Big Bang universe. Science News Online (June 12). Available at [Go to]
Citations & References:
seperator
  • Kashlinsky, A., F. Atrio-Barandela, D. Kocevski and H. Ebeling. 2008. A measurement of large-scale peculiar velocities of clusters of galaxies: results and cosmological implications. Astrophysical Journal Letters, in press, October 20 (686). Available online at arXiv:0809.3734v1 or by following this [Go to]
  • Kashlinsky, A., F. Atrio-Barandela, D. Kocevski and H. Ebeling. 2008. A measurement of large-scale peculiar velocities of clusters of galaxies: technical details. Astrophysical Journal, in press. Available online at arXiv:0809.3733v1 or by following this [Go to]
Reader Favorites:
seperator
SN on the Web:
seperator