Web edition: October 2, 2008
In recent years, we’ve witnessed a big push by the feds,
municipalities and green-touting enviro groups to swap out our energy-hogging lights,
those filament-glowing incandescent bulbs. They’re the type that Thomas Edison commercialized
little more than a decade after the Civil War. In their place we’re supposed to
screw in lower-watt but equally bright compact fluorescent lights, or CFLs. The
rub: CFLs rely on mercury to get their glow. And when a bulb breaks, that neurotoxic
element can taint your home.
Mercury contamination can prove quite persistent. Although
most of a CFL’s mercury vapor exits a broken bulb within a few days, it can
impregnate surfaces and eventually reenter the air. Which brings to mind a
story I wrote several years ago about attempts to diagnose the sources of high
indoor mercury concentrations. Tainting in one apartment traced to mercury
offgassing from a meter-square section of flooring. The most likely
explanation: A thermometer broke there years earlier.
Those old thermometers typically contained about 500
milligrams of mercury; today’s CFLs contain 5 mg or less. But even the CFLs’
contents might pose concerns, at least under some circumstances, according to a
report by Robert Hurt and his colleagues at
These researchers cite data from a study that released 1 mg
of mercury into a 500 meter3 room to simulate a CFL break. Without
ventilation, air concentrations reached 2 micrograms per m3 — or 10
times the federally recommended safe upper exposure limit for children.
So imagine now that you’re carefully carrying a handful of
bulbs to install in lamps around the home and pooch gets underfoot. As you
trip, those CFLs all go crashing onto a hard floor. What now?
I’ve read a lot of websites by municipal governments and
even the Environmental Protection Agency. And when asked what to do about
broken CFLs, most punt and simply tell consumers that the modern ones release
too little mercury to pose a risk. Interestingly, they don’t even touch the
issue of breakage in bigger fluorescent lights, such as the long tubes used
over work benches or those ugly circular tubes needed to light some
old-fashioned kitchen-ceiling fixtures. These fluorescents contain
substantially more mercury than a palm-sized CFL.
More cautious websites, like EPA’s, recommend airing a mercury-tainted
room for 15 minutes after a CFL breaks. Instruct family members or pets to exit
the room without passing near the broken bulb. Later, scoop up visible debris
with a piece of cardboard and then swab the affected area with a wet paper
towel. What should you do with the debris and wet towels? EPA tells us to seal
them in a plastic bag.
Actually, ditch that suggestion.
Plastic doesn’t work, Hurt told me this afternoon. Another
lab found evidence that plastic wouldn’t securely trap mercury, “and we tried
to confirm those results. Sure enough,” he found, “if you put a broken bulb in a
plastic bag, the mercury goes right through it. It surprised me, but it’s
true.” So if you bag a broken CFL and toss it in the kitchen trash can, every
time you lift its lid “you’ll get a face full [of mercury].”
Hurt prefers EPA’s alternative option: Put broken CFLs in a
sealed glass jar.
Where a bulb has broken on a hard surface, like a linoleum
floor, EPA instructs us not to use a broom (which will become contaminated) or
vacuum (which will not only become contaminated but also forcefully spew
mercury vapor into the air and, potentially, other rooms).
If bulb debris ends up on carpeting, we’re to use sticky
tape (like duct tape) to pick up any tiny pieces or powderlike residue. If the area
must be vacuumed, EPA says to immediately empty its now-contaminated bag and
pitch that into a sealed plastic bag (oops, glass jar), and immediately walk it
out to the trash. (This conveniently ducks the issue of what to do with the
increasingly common bagless vacuums.)
Don’t wash mercury-contaminated clothing or fabric, EPA
instructs: Just pitch them out. And never dispose of CFL wastes in an
incinerator chute; burning them will only release their mercury into the air.
If your bulb dies but isn’t broken, most municipalities require
keeping it out of the general trash. Instead, dispose of it as hazardous waste.
So, does this sound like a cleanup for something that poses
no toxic risk?
Actually, the mixed message we’ve been getting about the
safety of CFLs looks like a move to downplay any mercury hazard in the interests
of pushing energy conservation. I suppose most CFL proponents figure that by
the time new bulbs die — after five or more years of use — someone will have
figured out a long-term safety strategy for the newly mushrooming stream of
CFLs entering commerce and our homes. And, actually, Hurt’s team has a new technology
that might help quite a bit here (see my next post).
When I spoke with her for yesterday’s blog, Yale’s Julie Zimmerman described the CFL-mercury issue as the reverse of the “tragedy of the commons”:
What’s good for society might not always be in the best interest of the
individual.
Citations
Johnson, N.C., . . . and R.H. Hurt. 2008. Mercury Vapor Release from Broken Compact Fluorescent Lamps and In Situ Capture by New Nanomaterial Sorbents. Environmental Science & Technology 42(Aug. 1):5772.
Suggested Reading
Science & the Public : Fluorescent bulbs offer mercury advantage
Landfills Make Mercury More Toxic
Old thermometers pose new problems
Science & the Public : Trapping Compact Fluorescents’ Toxic Gas
Please alert Science News to any inappropriate posts by clicking the REPORT SPAM link within the post. Comments will be reviewed before posting.
While we're on the subject of conservation of energy, here's a suggestion for a was Science News can help save trees and help lower the user of potentially toxic ink.
Change your Web site's article print routine so that it doesn't require your readers to use two sheets of paper and colored ink to print an article that would easily have fit on one sheet using only black ink.
Even better, just display a black on white, text-only page containing the printable version if each article. That way, users can employ their browser's Print Preview feature. In Firefox and Internet Explorer (and I'm sure other major browsers) this allows the user to scale the print text up (or down) to best meet their viewing requirements and it also allows them to directly determine how many pages will be used to print the article.
This, alone, would probably save hundreds of thousands of dollars each year in wasted paper and ink.
Cheers,
Brad
is the whole fear factr, especially for CFLs being way overplayed?
You must register with Science News to add a comment. To log-in click here. To register as a new user, follow this link.