Quantcast
issue
Read articles, including Science News stories written for ages 9-14, on the SNK website.
Oops! A Fluorescent Light Breaks
A+ A- Text Size

By Janet Raloff

Web edition: October 2, 2008

Enlarge
Handle with Care
Each of these energy-efficient lights contains a pinch of toxic mercury, which can pollute the environment if a bulb breaks.
iStockphoto/edelmar

In recent years, we’ve witnessed a big push by the feds, municipalities and green-touting enviro groups to swap out our energy-hogging lights, those filament-glowing incandescent bulbs. They’re the type that Thomas Edison commercialized little more than a decade after the Civil War. In their place we’re supposed to screw in lower-watt but equally bright compact fluorescent lights, or CFLs. The rub: CFLs rely on mercury to get their glow. And when a bulb breaks, that neurotoxic element can taint your home.

Mercury contamination can prove quite persistent. Although most of a CFL’s mercury vapor exits a broken bulb within a few days, it can impregnate surfaces and eventually reenter the air. Which brings to mind a story I wrote several years ago about attempts to diagnose the sources of high indoor mercury concentrations. Tainting in one apartment traced to mercury offgassing from a meter-square section of flooring. The most likely explanation: A thermometer broke there years earlier.

Those old thermometers typically contained about 500 milligrams of mercury; today’s CFLs contain 5 mg or less. But even the CFLs’ contents might pose concerns, at least under some circumstances, according to a report by Robert Hurt and his colleagues at Brown University in the Aug. 1 Environmental Science & Technology.

These researchers cite data from a study that released 1 mg of mercury into a 500 meter3 room to simulate a CFL break. Without ventilation, air concentrations reached 2 micrograms per m3 — or 10 times the federally recommended safe upper exposure limit for children.

So imagine now that you’re carefully carrying a handful of bulbs to install in lamps around the home and pooch gets underfoot. As you trip, those CFLs all go crashing onto a hard floor. What now?

I’ve read a lot of websites by municipal governments and even the Environmental Protection Agency. And when asked what to do about broken CFLs, most punt and simply tell consumers that the modern ones release too little mercury to pose a risk. Interestingly, they don’t even touch the issue of breakage in bigger fluorescent lights, such as the long tubes used over work benches or those ugly circular tubes needed to light some old-fashioned kitchen-ceiling fixtures. These fluorescents contain substantially more mercury than a palm-sized CFL.

More cautious websites, like EPA’s, recommend airing a mercury-tainted room for 15 minutes after a CFL breaks. Instruct family members or pets to exit the room without passing near the broken bulb. Later, scoop up visible debris with a piece of cardboard and then swab the affected area with a wet paper towel. What should you do with the debris and wet towels? EPA tells us to seal them in a plastic bag.

Actually, ditch that suggestion.

Plastic doesn’t work, Hurt told me this afternoon. Another lab found evidence that plastic wouldn’t securely trap mercury, “and we tried to confirm those results. Sure enough,” he found, “if you put a broken bulb in a plastic bag, the mercury goes right through it. It surprised me, but it’s true.” So if you bag a broken CFL and toss it in the kitchen trash can, every time you lift its lid “you’ll get a face full [of mercury].”

Hurt prefers EPA’s alternative option: Put broken CFLs in a sealed glass jar.

Where a bulb has broken on a hard surface, like a linoleum floor, EPA instructs us not to use a broom (which will become contaminated) or vacuum (which will not only become contaminated but also forcefully spew mercury vapor into the air and, potentially, other rooms).

If bulb debris ends up on carpeting, we’re to use sticky tape (like duct tape) to pick up any tiny pieces or powderlike residue. If the area must be vacuumed, EPA says to immediately empty its now-contaminated bag and pitch that into a sealed plastic bag (oops, glass jar), and immediately walk it out to the trash. (This conveniently ducks the issue of what to do with the increasingly common bagless vacuums.)

Don’t wash mercury-contaminated clothing or fabric, EPA instructs: Just pitch them out. And never dispose of CFL wastes in an incinerator chute; burning them will only release their mercury into the air.

If your bulb dies but isn’t broken, most municipalities require keeping it out of the general trash. Instead, dispose of it as hazardous waste.

So, does this sound like a cleanup for something that poses no toxic risk?

Actually, the mixed message we’ve been getting about the safety of CFLs looks like a move to downplay any mercury hazard in the interests of pushing energy conservation. I suppose most CFL proponents figure that by the time new bulbs die — after five or more years of use — someone will have figured out a long-term safety strategy for the newly mushrooming stream of CFLs entering commerce and our homes. And, actually, Hurt’s team has a new technology that might help quite a bit here (see my next post).

When I spoke with her for yesterday’s blog, Yale’s Julie Zimmerman described the CFL-mercury issue as the reverse of the “tragedy of the commons”: What’s good for society might not always be in the best interest of the individual.

Comment
Print Friendly and PDF

Johnson, N.C., . . . and R.H. Hurt. 2008. Mercury Vapor Release from Broken Compact Fluorescent Lamps and In Situ Capture by New Nanomaterial Sorbents. Environmental Science & Technology 42(Aug. 1):5772.

Comments (6)

Please alert Science News to any inappropriate posts by clicking the REPORT SPAM link within the post. Comments will be reviewed before posting.

  • Actually one of the BEST pieces of news I have ever gotten about Home Depot is that they announced this year a program to recycle said bulbs. It is supposed to start in select stores and spread nation wide eventually. This would be a great help in concerns I have had about what to do with my old used bulbs. Now to find out if they will take the broken ones too...
    Ward McMillan Ward McMillan
    Oct. 4, 2008 at 7:33am
  • High,

    While we're on the subject of conservation of energy, here's a suggestion for a was Science News can help save trees and help lower the user of potentially toxic ink.

    Change your Web site's article print routine so that it doesn't require your readers to use two sheets of paper and colored ink to print an article that would easily have fit on one sheet using only black ink.

    Even better, just display a black on white, text-only page containing the printable version if each article. That way, users can employ their browser's Print Preview feature. In Firefox and Internet Explorer (and I'm sure other major browsers) this allows the user to scale the print text up (or down) to best meet their viewing requirements and it also allows them to directly determine how many pages will be used to print the article.

    This, alone, would probably save hundreds of thousands of dollars each year in wasted paper and ink.

    Cheers,
    Brad
    Brad Paulsen Brad Paulsen
    Oct. 5, 2008 at 3:16am
  • Nobody has explained to me the toxic difference between 500 mg of metallic Hg and 5mg of HgO (HgCl) used in the CFLs. I'm not so sure that either forms of Hg are available as, say, any organoHg compound.

    is the whole fear factr, especially for CFLs being way overplayed?
    Bill Foote Bill Foote
    Oct. 5, 2008 at 2:42pm
  • Ward, if you haven't seen it already, look at the next blog on trapping Hg from CFLs...it describes the Home Depot program, which is already underway throughout the United States (and started a year ago, nationwide, in Canada).
    jar jar
    Oct. 6, 2008 at 9:10am
  • What they never tell you is the amount of mercury produced by a coal fired power plant to power the same light in an incadescent far exceeds the amount used in a CFL. In the long run we are still reducing electricity use, and lessening the mercury produced by power plants even if it brings the lesser amount into ones home.
    Rod Pruitt Rod Pruitt
    Oct. 14, 2008 at 2:21pm
  • Personally I do not think they are that bad. Find the files you are looking for at rapidshare-provider.com the most comprehensive source for free-to-try files downloads on the Web
    Liza Danilova Liza Danilova
    Jul. 25, 2009 at 3:20am
Registered readers are invited to post a comment. To encourage fruitful discussion, please keep your comments relevant, brief and courteous. Offensive, irrelevant, nonsensical and commercial posts will not be published. (All links will be removed from comments.)

You must register with Science News to add a comment. To log-in click here. To register as a new user, follow this link.

Follow Us