The 2008 Nobel Prize in physics has been awarded to three
theoretical physicists for advances involving the concept of symmetry breaking. The
theory highlights how three of the four seemingly disparate forces in nature
fall under the same umbrella. The work forms a cornerstone of the standard
model of particle physics.
Half of the $1.4 million prize goes to Yoichiro Nambu of the
University of Chicago’s Enrico Fermi Institute. He
began formulating his mathematical description of a type of symmetry violation,
known as spontaneous broken symmetry, as early as 1960.
The other half is shared by Japanese researchers Makoto
Kobayashi of the High Energy Accelerator Research Organization in Tsukuba and
Toshihide Maskawa of Kyoto
University’s Yukawa
Institute for Theoretical Physics. Kobayashi and Maskawa discovered the origin
of another type of symmetry violation that had been observed but not explained.
Their work successfully predicted that nature must have at least three families
of quarks, which are the fundamental building blocks of matter such as neutrons
and protons.
The accomplishments of the winners tie in to the “most
essential ideas in our understanding of modern physics,” says physicist Brian
Greene of Columbia University in New
York City.
“The basic laws of physics seem to be incredibly symmetric,”
Greene adds, “but to get the kinds of things that we’re used to in the word
around us — stars, planets and people — that symmetry needs to be reduced in
order for that kind of structure to emerge.”
It’s like adding paint to a blank canvas, notes Greene. On a
bare canvas, every point is the same as every other — there’s complete
symmetry. But to see the beauty of a painting emerge, a painter adds splashes
of color, which reduces the symmetry, “and that’s what needed to happen in the
universe,” he says. The cosmos began as a hot uniform sea of particles in which
all the laws of physics had melded into one, but transformed and cooled into a
rich tapestry.
Nambu discovered that symmetries in nature can be hidden — and
spontaneously broken. That idea of hidden symmetries has now become a guiding
principle in understanding nature at its deepest level, says Turner.
One way to understand spontaneously broken symmetry is to
imagine a round dinner table at which the place settings are symmetric. There’s
a napkin to the left and right of each dinner plate, so either side looks the
same. But once a diner reaches for a napkin to the left, he determines the
choice for everyone at the table, and the symmetry is broken.
In the early 1960s, Nambu was studying the phenomenon of
superconductivity, in which electric current, below a certain temperature,
suddenly flows without any resistance. Below this critical temperature, electrons,
which normally repel each other, abruptly bind up in pairs. It took Nambu two
years to develop the concept of spontaneous symmetry breaking in order to explain
how superconductivity works. He then rapidly applied the idea to particle
physics.
“Nambu was the first to apply the idea of a spontaneously
broken symmetry in elementary particle physics — that is, a symmetry that is an
exact property of the underlying equations of the theory, but is not realized
in the solutions of these equations, and hence not easily apparent in the
properties of elementary particles,” says Steven Weinberg of the University of
Texas at Austin, who shared the 1979 Nobel Prize in physics. Nambu’s idea “has
proved crucial in understanding the properties of particles that interact
through the strong nuclear force, in particular pi mesons,” he says, adding
that it has also helped unify the weak and electromagnetic interactions.
Nambu discovered a mechanism embedded in the laws of physics
that allowed the character of symmetries to change as the universe evolved. In
technical parlance, Nambu introduced a scalar field, which Greene likens to a
ubiquitous mist. “We don’t know it’s there, it has no manifest features, but
the laws of physics know about that mist and it plays the role of reducing symmetry,”
says Greene.
“His study of this broken symmetry not only paved the way
for hidden symmetry in particle physics more broadly,” Turner says, “but also
explained why the pi meson is so much lighter than all the other mesons.”
Kobayashi and Maskawa examined a very different sort of
symmetry violation. They were trying to explain a set of puzzling experiments,
first performed by James Cronin and Val Fitch in the mid 1960s. In those
experiments, subatomic particles called K mesons didn’t behave the same if the
particles were replaced by their antiparticles and the same experiment took
place in a looking-glass universe, where right and left were interchanged.
(Cronin and Fitch went on to win the 1980 Nobel Prize for the experiment.)
In 1972, Kobayashi and Maskawa found that this puzzling
asymmetry could be explained if the family of elementary particles was expanded
to include at least three families of quarks. At the time, only three
quarks were known — up, down and strange. The up and down form one family.
Missing members of the other families were subsequently discovered in
experiments. The charm quark (partner of the strange quark) was discovered in
1974; the bottom quark (1977) and the top quark in (1994) make up the third
family.
Their theory also suggested that physicists could
observe a symmetry violation in another type of elementary particle, the
B-meson, which is ten times heavier than a K meson, or kaon. Because the broken
symmetry involving the B meson occurs rarely, physicists built giant “B
factories,” one at the Stanford Linear Accelerator Center in California
and the other at the KEK Accelerator Laboratory in Tsukuba, Japan. These factories each
produced more than a million B mesons a day. In 2001, both experiments
confirmed the B meson violation that Kobayashi and Maskawa had predicted nearly
three decades earlier.
Found in: Matter & Energy and Physics
"Broken Symmetry" Is Physics' Term Of Biology's "Evolution"
A. Nobel Prize in physics shared for work that unifies forces of nature
http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/37300/title/Nobel_Prize_in_physics_shared_for_work_that_unifies_forces_of_nature
- "Understanding of broken symmetry has been crucial to the standard model of particle physics."
- "The basic laws of physics seem to be incredibly symmetric".
- "The cosmos began as a hot uniform sea of particles in which all the laws of physics had melded into one, but transformed and cooled into a rich tapestry."
- "Nambu discovered a mechanism embedded in the laws of physics that allowed the character of symmetries to 'change as the universe evolved'."
B. My primitive commonsensical understanding of the concept of "broken symmetry" is simply and plainly "evolution".
My understanding is that:
- "Symmetry" is a "uniformly steady state matrix".
- "Laws of physics" cannot and do not "seem to be" anything. The laws of nature, like rules of grammar for language, are products of cosmic evolution, the evolution of energy. They represent the most often observed repeats of processes. They are not vague mystic directors of the courses of processes, but a summary of their observed repeats.
- "The laws of physics had melded into one" as "the cosmos began as a hot uniform sea of particles"? NO. At singularity there were no "laws of physics".
- "Discovered a mechanism embedded in the laws of physics that allowed the character of symmetries to 'change as the universe evolved'? NO. This is harnessing the horses at the rear of the carriage. As the universe evolved the character of symmetries continuously changed and "laws of physics" have thus evolved.
C. "Broken Symmetry" Is Physics' Term Of Biology's "Evolution"
This is another Glimpse Of Forces-Matter-Life Unified Theory...
Dov Henis
http://blog.360.yahoo.com/blog-P81pQcU1dLBbHgtjQjxG_Q--?cq=1
Is understanding how the fundamental symmetries of nature are broken will benefit most of mankind? I don't think 99.9% of mankind will benefit in the foreseeable future. But other branch of Physics effecting all mankind in this generation and generations for the next millennium GEOPHYSICS. The discoveries and improvements in the field of CLIMATE CHANGE can (with political will) benefit all mankind.
For Nobel to Charles Keeling we are to late so maybe Jim Hansen maybe someone else from the field. But the cosmic microwave background radiation is much less important then the radiation balance of Earth.
P.S. Alfred Nobel have the option of invention and improvement in his will no need to discover anything.
A model which predicted the existence of three additional quarks well before they were discovered is quite profound.
The existence of an overwhelming preponderance of matter over antimatter as the apparent result of a broken symmetry wherein there was one extra normal matter particle or every 10 billion antimatter particles has profoundly altered the evolution of our universe including allowing life as we know it to exist.
In certain theories of the Big Bang, there may exist an ensemble to an infinite number of domains wherein each domain is akin to a section of a huge ice crystal wherein within the given domain or crystal sub-component, the crystalline structure is uniform and with its own particular orientation. Accordingly, each domain within our universe or Big Bang may have its own unique combinations of laws of physics, relative strengths of fundamental forces, values of fundamental constants, numbers of fundamental particle species etc., as a result of the particular values of such parameters that were frozen out as the universe cooled from its initial incredibly hot and dense state.
These domains might, according to some versions of the respective models each have an infinite extent.
I have often wondered if humanity in the very far cosmically distant future will determine how to access any existent alternate domains as such. To find a domain wherein there was 1 extra antimatter particle for every 10 billion normal matter particles would provide an inexhaustible supply of antimatter which could be reacted with normal matter for energy generation.
Now the latter sounds far out, but who really knows what we will be able to accomplish in some distant epoch given the many fine minds that well exist and build on the foundations laid by these three brilliant scientists for which the Nobel Prize was just rewarded.
Consider Isaac Newton’s simple experiments which led to the formulation of Newton’s Laws of motion such as F = MA and the like. Newton and his colleagues would no doubt be totally impressed with the modern Space Shuttle, the International Space Station, as well as the plethora of space probes that we have sent throughout our planetary solar system.
Please login or register to participate.