Supreme Court lifts restriction on Navy sonar testing
Justices overturn restrictions that require Navy to stop using sonar when marine mammals are within 2,200 yards of vessels
Web edition : Thursday, November 13th, 2008
font_down font_up Text Size

Citing national security interests, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled on November 12 that the Navy can once again conduct sonar training exercises, even if the tests harm marine life.

The 5–4 decision overturns restrictions that require the Navy to stop using sonar when marine mammals are spotted within 2,200 yards of its vessels.

The Navy uses sonar technology to send underwater sound waves at frequencies between 1 kHz and 10 kHz. Gauging the time it takes the acoustic waves to echo off an object — enemy submarines in a combat situation — provides a way to determine the distance to the target.

Environmentalists, represented by the Natural Resources Defense Council, say the loud blasts can cause permanent hearing loss, decompression sickness and major behavioral disruptions in sea animals. The NRDC claims that the damage may go undetected because some of the affected creatures spend little time at the ocean’s surface (“Bad Bubbles: Could sonar give whales the bends?” SN: 10/11/03; Stranded: A Whale of a Mystery, SN: 7/19/08).

Following the court’s decision, the Navy can conduct their training exercises off the southern California coast, even if sea lions, dolphins or whales are spotted, though they still must cease activity if sea life is spotted within 200 yards, in accordance with a previous self-imposed regulation.

The court’s majority opinion contends that the public’s greater interest is preparing the Navy to protect the United States from enemy submarines by running realistic training exercises, outweighing the public’s interest in protecting sea life. Written by Chief Justice John Roberts, the majority opinion states that “active sonar is the only reliable technology for detecting and tracking enemy diesel-electric submarines, and the President — the Commander in Chief — has determined that training with active sonar is ‘essential to national security.’ ”


Found in: Environment and Life
Comments 4
  • What's also disturbing about this is the Supreme Court's mindless deference to the military and disregard for the science involved. Did they require the military to support their position scientifically that this technology was necessary and couldn't be modified?
    Lorien House Lorien House
    Nov. 21, 2008 at 9:04pm
  • Judging from the lack of many comments, the well being of whales seems to not be very high on AOL user's radar.
    It's too bad we have people like Bush, Roberts and the other judges making this decision, still in power. Just how dangerous has it been it for our Navy off the coast of California lately? Or in the foreseeable future? Our Navy also survived 50 plus years of the cold war rather well it seems, without harming and killing whales.
    Of course, the same leaders have little regard for Polar Bears, Grizzly Bears or Wolves.
    This is'nt about security; it's about little boys with deadly toys and no parental supervision. I hope Obama can change this "Old" court with appointments that better reflect the wishes of what I believe is the majority of Americans. Join the NRDC and help them continue the fight for responsible human behavior toward wildlife sharing our planet.
    willard whitmon Butch
    Nov. 16, 2008 at 6:10am
  • Mr. Mellott:
    The Infra-Inter frequencies damage the neurological function of all mammalians, including human. Listen at a stop light to some of the vehicles violating ALL 80dB standards WITHIN the vehicle next to you. It remains a very serious problem, not only for marine mammalians, but more so for humans who cannot swim away from some of the pervasive violation of Federal, State and Municipal standards, - while Police do not have the funds or motivation necessary to enforce the statutes. COMITY might help. The Justices ruled on the Security issue only, not that irreparable damage continues to be done to human and mammalian neurological systems. Anne Arundel County, ( Maryland ), ordered dB meters and calibrators two years ago, trained Police to use them, and are not yet able to spare personnel to enforce dB standards. Cordially; D.Walsh.

    david walsh david walsh
    Nov. 14, 2008 at 5:39am
  • Is there any way to refine the technology? Perhaps they could get by with lower energies being generated as a ping, both in amplutude and duration, if they had an array of senders and receivers. Perhaps they need to have deployable mini-subs, towed devices, or the likes, that would act as an array that would increase the detail and effective sensitivity of the process. The same system could also possibly be used to mis-guide an enemies attempt at finding or attacking them. Sincerely, Gregory D. MELLOTT
    Gregory MELLOTT gdmellott
    Nov. 14, 2008 at 1:01am
Post a comment

Please login or register to participate.


Advertisement
Suggested Reading:
seperator
Reader Favorites:
seperator
SN on the Web:
seperator