Standard model gets right answer for proton, neutron masses
Correct calculation strengthens theory of quark-gluon interactions in nuclear particles
font_down font_up Text Size
access
ALMOST CERTAINNew calculations of the mass of protons and neutrons, which consist of quarks and gluons, confirm standard theory.A. Nandy

When it comes to weighty matters, quarks and gluons rule the universe, a new study confirms.

One of the largest computational efforts to calculate the masses of protons and neutrons shows that the standard model of particle physics predicts those masses with an uncertainty of less than 4 percent.

Christian Hoelbling, affiliated with the Bergische Universtät Wuppertal in Germany, the Eötvös University in Budapest and the CNRS in Marseille, France, and his colleagues report their findings in the Nov. 21 Science.

Nearly all the mass of ordinary matter consists of atomic nuclei, which are composed of neutrons and protons. These particles are in turn composed of quarks, which are held together by massless particles called gluons.

Gluons are the messenger particles that carry the strong nuclear force and are constantly being exchanged by the quarks, as described by the theory known as quantum chromodynamics, or QCD. These exchanges bind quarks together by changing a quark property known as color charge. This charge is similar to electric charge but comes in three different types, whimsically referred to as red, green and blue. Six different types of quarks interact with eight varieties of gluons to create a panoply of elementary particles.

The new computations confirm a prediction of QCD, the authors say. That prediction is that the masses of particles such as the neutron and proton come from the energy associated with the interactions between quarks and gluons.

Calculating exactly how those interactions generate the masses of protons and neutrons requires several types of approximations. That’s in part because QCD has some peculiar properties: Because the gluon-mediated force between quarks grows stronger as they separate, quarks can never be seen as free agents, but only in pairs. On the other hand, at extremely short distances, which are probed at high energies, quarks and gluons interact very weakly.

In their calculations, Hoelbling and collaborators approximated the continuum of spacetime with a four-dimensional crystal lattice composed of discrete points spaced along columns and rows. The researchers solved the equations of QCD on finer and finer lattices, and then extrapolated the results to the continuum, painstakingly accounting and measuring every approximation and uncertainty along the way.

Although the match between QCD and known particle masses was expected, the finding is still important, team asserts. “It was stated as a conjecture over three decades ago that these fundamental particles — quarks and gluons — would never be observed but rather [only] bound states of them, like the proton and the neutron,” Hoelbling and colleagues explained in an e-mail message. Moreover, the team says, physicists can now more confidently apply QCD to other phenomena in particle physics that still require a QCD explanation.

“Because these accurate calculations agree with laboratory measurements, we now know, rather than just believe, that the source of mass of everyday matter is QCD,” notes Andreas Kronfeld of the Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory in Batavia, Ill., in a commentary accompanying the Science article.

In other words, QCD is QED.


Found in: Atom & Cosmos and Matter & Energy
Comments 2
  • On Energy, Mass, Gravity, And Galaxies Clusters -
    A Commonsensible Recapitulation


    A. "Heavyweight galaxies in the young universe"
    http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/42419/title/Heavyweight_galaxies_in_the_young_universe
    New observations of full-grown galaxies in the young universe may force astrophysicists to revise their leading theory of galaxy formation, at least as it applies to regions where galaxies congregate into clusters.


    B. Some brief notes in "Light On Dark Matter?", at
    http://www.physforum.com/index.php?showtopic=22994&st=0&#entry373127

    - "Galaxy Clusters Evolved By Dispersion, Not By Conglomeration"
    - Introduction of E=Total[m(1 + D)]
    - "Dark Energy And Matter And The Emperor's New Clothes"
    - "Evolutionary Cosmology: Ordained Or Random"
    - "“Movie” Of Microwave Pulse Transitioning From Quantum To Classical Physics"
    - "Broken Symmetry" Is Physics' Term Of Biology's "Evolution"
    - "A Glimpse Of Forces-Matter-Life Unified Theory"


    C. Commonsensible conception of gravity

    1. According to the standard model, which describes all the forces in nature except gravity, all elementary particles were born massless. Interactions with the proposed Higgs field would slow down some of the particles and endow them with mass. Finding the Higgs — or proving it does not exist — has therefore become one of the most important quests in particle physics.

    However, for a commonsensible primitive mind with a commonsensible universe represented by
    E=Total[m(1 + D)], this conceptual equation describes gravity. It does not explain gravity. It describes it. It applies to the whole universe and to every and all specific cases, regardless of size.

    2. Thus gravity is simply another face of the total cosmic energy. Thus gravity is THE cosmic parent of phenomena such as black holes and life. It is the display of THE all-pervasive-embracive strained space texture, laid down by the expanding galactic clusters, also noticed in the expanding energy backlashes into various constructs of temporary constrained energy packages.


    3. "Extrapolation of the expansion of the universe backwards in time to the early hot dense "Big Bang" phase, using general relativity, yields an infinite density and temperature at a finite time in the past. At age 10^-35 seconds the Universe begins with a cataclysm that generates space and time, as well as all the matter and energy the Universe will ever hold."

    At D=0, E was = m and both E and m were, together, all the energy and matter the Universe will ever hold. Since the onset of the cataclysm E remains constant and m diminishes as D increases.
    The increase of D is the inflation, followed by expansion, of what became the galactic clusters.

    At 10^-35 seconds, D in E=Total[m(1 + D)] was already a fraction of a second above zero. This is when gravity started. This is what started gravity. At this instance starts the space texture, starts the straining of the space texture, and starts the "space texture memory", gravity, that may eventually overcome expansion and initiate re-impansion back to singularity.


    D. Commonsensible conception of the forces other than gravity

    The forces other than gravity are, commonsensibly, forces involved in conjunction with evolution:
    http://royalsociety.org/downloaddoc.asp?id=4770

    The farthest we go in reductionism in Everything, including in Life, we shall still end up with wholism, until we arrive at energy. Energy is the base element of everything and of all in the universe. At the beginning was the energy singularity, at the end will be near zero mass and an infinite dispersion of the beginning energy, and in-between, the universe undergoes continuous evolution consisting of myriad energy-to-energy and energy-to-mass-to-energy transformations.

    The universe, and everything in it, are continuously evolving, and all the evolutions are intertwined.


    E. PS: On Cosmic Energy And Mass Evolutions

    As mass is just another face of energy it is commonsensible to regard not only life, but mass in general, as a format of temporarily constrained energy.

    It therefore ensues that whereas the expanding cosmic constructs, the galaxies clusters, are - overall - continuously converting "their" original pre-inflation mass back to energy, the overall evolution WITHIN them, within the clusters, is in the opposite direction, temporarily constrained
    energy packages such as black holes and biospheres and other energy-storing mass-formats are precariuosly forming and "doing best" to survive as long as "possible"...


    Dov Henis
    (Comments From The 22nd Century)
    Life's Manifest
    http://www.the-scientist.com/community/posts/list/112.page#578
    EVOLUTION Beyond Darwin 200
    http://www.physforum.com/index.php?showtopic=14988&st=405&#entry396201
    http://www.the-scientist.com/community/posts/list/100/122.page#1407


    =======================================
    Gravity Limits Link Ultracold And Superhot,
    Our Inability To Create Singularity

    A. From "Strings Link the Ultracold with the Superhot"
    http://www.sciencenews.org/view/feature/id/42632/title/Strings_Link_the_Ultracold_with_the_Superhot
    Perfect liquids suggest theory’s math mirrors something real
    "When the universe was very young, and still superhot from the aftermath of the Big Bang, plasma should have been the only state of matter around. And that’s what scientists at Brookhaven expected to see when they smashed gold ions together at 99.99 percent of the speed of light using a machine called RHIC (for Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider). RHIC physicists thought the ion collisions would melt the gold’s protons and neutrons into a hot plasma of quarks and gluons at a temperature of a trillion kelvins, replicating conditions similar to those a microsecond after the birth of the universe. But instead of a gaslike plasma, the physicists reported in 2005, RHIC served up a hot quark soup, behaving more like a liquid than a plasma or gas."

    B. The expectation of Brookhaven scientists was a bit unrealistic
    The "aftermath of the Big Bang" lasted much less than 10^-35 seconds. This is evidenced by the fact that "Gravity Is THE Manifestation Of The Onset Of Cosmic Inflation Cataclysm" :
    http://www.the-scientist.com/community/posts/list/184.page#1950
    and
    http://www.the-scientist.com/community/posts/list/184.page#1982
    With all respect due to the scientists at Brookhaven it is very difficult to expect that they can recreate the state of pre big-bang energy-mass singularity.
    Commonsense is still the best scientific approach.

    Respectfully suggesting,
    Dov Henis
    (Comments From The 22nd Century)
    EVOLUTION Beyond Darwin 200
    http://www.physforum.com/index.php?showtopic=14988&st=405&#entry396201
    http://www.the-scientist.com/community/posts/list/100/122.page#1407
    ============================
    Commonsensible PS To
    Gravity Limits Link Ultracold And Superhot,
    Our Inability To Create Singularity

    A. From "Strings Link the Ultracold with the Superhot"
    http://www.sciencenews.org/view/feature/id/42632/title/Strings_Link_the_Ultracold_with_the_Superhot

    A new truth always has to contend with many difficulties,” the German physicist Max Planck said decades ago. “If it were not so, it would have been discovered much sooner.”

    B. IMO gravity is attempted reversal of inflation

    To me, a simple uninformed one, E=mc^2 is a derived formula, whereas E=Total[m(1 + D)] is a commonsensical descriptive concept.

    I intuitively regard both the ultracold and superhot liquids as being in a confined space and "striving but unable" to overcome D, to render D=0.

    I also intuitively regard our accelerated collisions smashups as attempted "reverse inflations" in the sense that Newton's law of universal gravitation seems to me as "reverse inflation".

    Dov Henis
    (Comments From The 22nd Century)
    Dov Henis Dov Henis
    Apr. 30, 2009 at 10:28am

  • This reported predictive success of the Standard Model shows what a marvelous achievement the Standard Model is. If the LHC of CERN discovers the Higgs Boson, this would put the standard model on all the more stable footing.

    Note however, that even if the Higgs Boson is discovered at the LHC, there still remains the possibility that quarks, and perhaps even leptons have a sub-structure or sub-composition that is not excited at the level of ordinary QCD physics.

    For instance, the reduced mass of the nucleons that comprise the helium nucleus relative to the rest mass of the constituent particles in their unbound states is accurately accounted for by the energy released in the fusion process by which the helium nucleus forms from nuclear fusion process involving the precursor particles. The quantity of the energy so released was common knowledge to nuclear physicists before the discovery of quarks and the formation of quantum-chromo-dynamics or qcd theory.

    Thus, there remains a possibility that the LHC and/or the proposed 1 to 2 TeV Linac will produce strong evidence of a substructure to quarks and/or leptons including perhaps additional nuclear forces by exciting particle decay modes that have not been previously observed.

    Regardless, the Standard Model is a beautiful model and may have unforeseen applications such as the production of stable particles called strangelets which include strange quarks. The possible development of such particles might even eventually lead to novel materials made of strange matter for which novel applications within the field of nuclear energy may arise.

    Some sort of exotic matter that might be based on unforeseen stable or metastable bound states involving top and/or bottom quarks may present itself in the future of qcd applications.

    Either way, the Standard Model will remain a valuable tool for decades to come
    James  Essig James Essig
    Nov. 20, 2008 at 11:20pm
Post a comment

Please login or register to participate.


Advertisement
Citations & References:
seperator
  • Kronfeld, A.S. 2008. The weight of the world is quantum chromodynamics. Science 322(Nov. 21):1198.
  • Durr, S. . . . C. Hoelbling, et al. 2008. Ab initio determination of light hadron masses. Science 322(Nov. 21):1224.
Reader Favorites:
seperator
SN on the Web:
seperator