Quantcast
issue
Read articles, including Science News stories written for ages 9-14, on the SNK website.
Is Your Fish Oil Polluted?
A+ A- Text Size

By Janet Raloff

Web edition: November 20, 2008

Diets rich in fish oil offer a number of health benefits, from fighting heart disease to boosting immunity. However, many noxious contaminants preferentially accumulate in fat. These include pesticides, brominated flame retardants, dioxins, and some related compounds known as polychlorinated biphenyls. So there’s been some concern that if a fish was pulled from polluted waters, its fat might be polluted too. And those pollutants could end up an unwanted bonus in commercial fish-oil supplements.

A new survey of some 154 different fish-oil capsules sold by 45 different companies now confirms that some supplements are remarkably dirty and others quite pure. In general, PCBs and a breakdown product of DDT were the major pollutants in fish-oil supplements. Adrian Covaci of the University of Antwerp, Belgium, and his colleagues reported their findings today at the Society of Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry meeting here in Tampa.
 
The mean concentrations detected were 15 nanograms per gram of oil for the PCBs and about two-thirds that amount for the DDT metabolite. Mean concentrations of polybrominated biphenyls, a widely used class of flame retardants, were much lower — down around 2 ng/g. That’s good news. Such trace amounts tend to be only about 3 to 12 percent as much of these pollutants as people would have received had they downed a meal of fish.

On the other hand, not all supplements were clean. And Covaci’s group linked the purity of the fish-oil capsules to several general factors. For instance — and no surprise — supplements made from the oil of fish caught in cleaner waters (hint: in Europe that would not be the Baltic) tended to have lower concentrations of toxic pollutants.

Perhaps a little less intuitive, oil derived from smaller species, such as anchovies, typically harbored fewer pollutants than did oil from their far bigger cousins — cod or salmon. Explains Covaci: Smaller fish tend to be shorter lived, so “they will have had less time to accumulate pollutants.”

Some companies go through a number of advanced chemical-stripping processes to remove fish-oil pollutants. And Covaci’s group confimed that the products from these suppliers tend to be quite clean.

The rub: Most companies don’t advertise how they processed their oils, and some don’t identify the source of their fish, much less what species they had tapped for its oil.

One surprise: Many companies that had labeled their supplements as being certified free of dioxins or methyl mercury actually turned up positive for those toxic contaminants. So they were still higher — more tainted — than the really clean supplements. Companies get away with advertising their fish-oil capsules as being free of these pollutants, Covaci explained to me, because pollutant values in them fall below concentrations allowed under European Union food-safety regs.

So much for truth in advertising.

Comment
Print Friendly and PDF

Comments (7)

Please alert Science News to any inappropriate posts by clicking the REPORT SPAM link within the post. Comments will be reviewed before posting.

  • Great information. But, the article would be more helpful if names, along with rsults were offered. Or, a place where such information might be obtained. Thank You.
    Russell La Claire Russell La Claire
    Nov. 21, 2008 at 7:39am
  • Quite.
    John Toradze John Toradze
    Nov. 21, 2008 at 8:51am
  • The researchers did not post the names of the fish oils they tested (quite common when evaluating commercial products, where brand names are shielded to protect...well, who?). In any case, you can contact Covaci at: Dept. of Pharmacy, Toxicology Group, Faculty of Pharmaceutical, Biomedical and Veterinary Sciences, Campus Drie Eiken, Universiteitsplein 1, BE-2610 Antwerpen (Wilrijk), Belgium.
    jar jar
    Nov. 21, 2008 at 2:38pm
  • Without the names of the products along with their purity, this article is of little use except to frighten people.
    Leisureguy Leisureguy
    Nov. 22, 2008 at 9:42am
  • If these levels of chemicals are below the EU regs. it is a waste of time to ask about sick people, there aren't any. However, there is nothing ambiguous or questionable about the effects of stress on the brain-body system. Articles such as this are what is toxic.
    ART DAY ART DAY
    Nov. 27, 2008 at 10:53pm
  • The point of articles, such as this one, are twofold: to point out that supplements may be a contributor to an individual's daily body burden of toxic chemicals; and to point out that some companies do a good job of keeping these chemicals out--which suggests others could also, if that was a priority. But it never will become a priority if nobody knows that this pollution is there in the first place.
    jar jar
    Dec. 7, 2008 at 12:54pm
  • If you would like to see free fish oil product testing results based on the CRN/GOED panel go to [Link was removed]
    Colin Garrioch Colin Garrioch
    Dec. 22, 2008 at 3:35pm
Registered readers are invited to post a comment. To encourage fruitful discussion, please keep your comments relevant, brief and courteous. Offensive, irrelevant, nonsensical and commercial posts will not be published. (All links will be removed from comments.)

You must register with Science News to add a comment. To log-in click here. To register as a new user, follow this link.

Follow Us