Web edition: December 19, 2008
Rumors are circulating that the Obama transition team has targeted the National Institutes of Health to receive a significant research-stimulus package: A big one — worth $1 billion. The news had research managers scrambling yesterday to identify how they might get the biggest bang for the buck if the money comes through.
A billion bucks sounds like a lot. And it is, especially in the current economic downturn. But NIH is also quite big, so the increase would amount to a budget only 3.4 percent bigger than what the Bush administration advocated for the agency in each of the last two budget cycles. Indeed, Bush asked to hold the current year's NIH budget to what it received in fiscal year 2008 (the year that ended in October). Because Congress never got around to passing an amended budget for the agency, NIH and most other research programs indeed are chugging along on that flat budget. Financed right now on what is called a continuing resolution, this agency and many others are surviving on a default monthly allocation equal to what had been doled out a year earlier — one that has not been adjusted upward to account for inflation.
According to the intrepid federal-budget trackers at the American Association for the Advancement of Science, “In real terms, the federal investment in basic and applied research has already declined since 2004, and under the continuing-resolution, federal funding of research would decline again in 2009 for the fifth year in a row.”
In fact, by the beginning of the current fiscal year, Congress had failed to pass any of some dozen appropriations bills for spending by discrete federal agencies. Instead, it passed a continuing resolution for the affected budgets. Fortunately for some, earlier in the year, a few agencies — including NIH — received a little extra money ($150 million for NIH in June) as part of a supplemental appropriation. However, continuing resolutions don’t account for such Christmas-in-June bonuses when calculating the monthly stipend that will continue until the year’s official spending bill is signed into law. So agencies such as NIH that had received a mid-year bonus will for the foreseeable future have to make due on a budget smaller than last year’s.
Bottom line: It looks like Mr. Obama is attempting to follow through on his pledge to endorse increased and targeted federal support for research at NIH and elsewhere. But presidents don't allocate spending, Congress does. So it will be up to the incoming administration to make a case to lawmakers, this winter, that Barack Obama's new blueprint for spending is prudent and that such holiday bonuses to deserving agencies are warranted post-inauguration day.
Suggested Reading
Please alert Science News to any inappropriate posts by clicking the REPORT SPAM link within the post. Comments will be reviewed before posting.
I'm trying to get in edgewise with people in astronomy (for starters). I'm writing to tell you about the unintended consequences of a new law (CPSIA) that will have a very negative effect on science education in the US. Effective 2/10/09, any product intended for children 12 and younger, that doesn't have a certain kind of certification, cannot be sold or even given away. I thought to write you in an attempt to galvanize consumers, hardly any consumers know about it or how it will affect their children's education.
For example, I know a supplier who sells telescopes to schools. As of february, he won't be. The testing costs $24,000 per model, he only sells $32,000 in gross sales of them so it doesn't make sense to continue selling them ( [Link was removed] ). We're thinking of cornering the market on paper towel cardboard tubes. When you're a kid, squinting through those is good enough for star gazing. Don't steal our idea, it's how we plan to make a living after tools used in science education are in effect, banned.
One of his suppliers is the largest producers of those little ten cent light bulbs that go into microscopes. That manufacturer has announced they will no longer be selling those either. Congress has determined that the tiny drop of lead solder renders them too hazardous to be around children so no more microscopes in schools either. ( [Link was removed] Yeah Congress! Boo science!
I'll spare you anymore boring details but basically, consumers, educators, kids and manufacturers are hosed. Any kind of child's product you can think of is affected. I work in apparel so I deal with anything clothes and shoes related. I thought I'd mention it to you so you could advise anyone interested and hopefully gain support in preventing the law's enactment. If you're interested in knowing more about it, let me know but I'm sure you'll find plenty on your own. It's be great if you could spread this news through out your community all over the country.
best regards
Kathleen
[Link was removed]
You must register with Science News to add a comment. To log-in click here. To register as a new user, follow this link.